Generate custom sales assets tailored to your prospect, audience, and goals. Supports interactive landing pages, presentation decks, executive one-pagers, and workflow/architecture demos.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncreate-an-assetExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches create-an-asset from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate create-an-asset. Access via /create-an-asset in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
Generate custom sales assets tailored to your prospect, audience, and goals. Supports interactive landing pages, presentation decks, executive one-pagers, and workflow/architecture demos.
Invoke this skill when:
/create-an-asset or /create-an-asset [CompanyName]This skill creates professional sales assets by gathering context about:
The skill then researches, structures, and builds a polished, branded asset ready to share with customers.
From the user's email domain, identify what company they work for.
Actions:
"[domain]" company products services site:linkedin.com OR site:crunchbase.com| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Single-product company | Auto-populate seller context |
| Multi-product company | Ask: "Which product or solution is this asset for?" |
| Consultant/agency/generic domain | Ask: "What company or product are you representing?" |
| Unknown/startup | Ask: "Briefly, what are you selling?" |
Store seller context:
seller:
company: "[Company Name]"
product: "[Product/Service]"
value_props:
- "[Key value prop 1]"
- "[Key value prop 2]"
- "[Key value prop 3]"
differentiators:
- "[Differentiator 1]"
- "[Differentiator 2]"
pricing_model: "[If publicly known]"
Persist to knowledge base for future sessions. On subsequent invocations, confirm: "I have your seller context from last time — still selling [Product] at [Company]?"
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Company | "Which company is this asset for?" | ✓ Yes |
| Key contacts | "Who are the key contacts? (names, roles)" | No |
| Deal stage | "What stage is this deal?" | ✓ Yes |
| Pain points | "What pain points or priorities have they shared?" | No |
| Past materials | "Upload any conversation materials (transcripts, emails, notes, call recordings)" | No |
Deal stage options:
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Audience type | "Who's viewing this?" | ✓ Yes |
| Specific roles | "Any specific titles to tailor for? (e.g., CTO, VP Engineering, CFO)" | No |
| Primary concern | "What do they care most about?" | ✓ Yes |
| Objections | "Any concerns or objections to address?" | No |
Audience type options:
Primary concern options:
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | "What's the goal of this asset?" | ✓ Yes |
| Desired action | "What should the viewer do after seeing this?" | ✓ Yes |
Goal options:
Ask the user: "What format works best for this?"
| Format | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive landing page | Multi-tab page with demos, metrics, calculators | Exec alignment, intros, value prop |
| Deck-style | Linear slides, presentation-ready | Formal meetings, large audiences |
| One-pager | Single-scroll executive summary | Leave-behinds, quick summaries |
| Workflow / Architecture demo | Interactive diagram with animated flow | Technical deep-dives, POC demos, integrations |
First, parse from user's description. Look for:
Then ask for any gaps:
| If Missing... | Ask... |
|---|---|
| Components unclear | "What systems or components are involved? (databases, APIs, AI, middleware, etc.)" |
| Flow unclear | "Walk me through the step-by-step flow" |
| Human touchpoints unclear | "Where does a human interact in this workflow?" |
| Scenario vague | "What's a concrete example scenario to demo?" |
| Integration specifics | "Any specific tools or platforms to highlight?" |
| Level | Indicators | Research Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Rich | Transcripts uploaded, detailed pain points, clear requirements | Light — fill gaps only |
| Moderate | Some context, no transcripts | Medium — company + industry |
| Sparse | Just company name | Deep — full research pass |
Prospect basics
"[Company]" annual report investor presentation 2025 2026"[Company]" CEO strategy priorities 2025 2026Leadership
"[Company]" CEO CTO CIO 2025Brand colors
"[Company]" brand guidelinesIndustry context
"[Industry]" trends challenges 2025 2026Technology landscape
"[Company]" technology stack tools platformsCompetitive context
"[Company]" vs [seller's competitors]| Purpose | Recommended Sections |
|---|---|
| Intro | Company Fit → Solution Overview → Key Use Cases → Why Us → Next Steps |
| Discovery follow-up | Their Priorities → How We Help → Relevant Examples → ROI Framework → Next Steps |
| Technical deep-dive | Architecture → Security & Compliance → Integration → Performance → Support |
| Exec alignment | Strategic Fit → Business Impact → ROI Calculator → Risk Mitigation → Partnership |
| POC proposal | Scope → Success Criteria → Timeline → Team → Investment → Next Steps |
| Deal close | Value Summary → Pricing → Implementation Plan → Terms → Sign-off |
Audience adjustments:
Same sections as landing page, formatted as linear slides:
1. Title slide (Prospect + Seller logos, partnership framing)
2. Agenda
3-N. One section per slide (or 2-3 slides for dense sections)
N+1. Summary / Key takeaways
N+2. Next steps / CTA
N+3. Appendix (optional — detailed specs, pricing, etc.)
Slide principles:
Condense to single-scroll format:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HERO: "[Prospect Goal] with [Product]" │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ KEY POINT 1 │ KEY POINT 2 │ KEY POINT 3 │
│ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │
│ sentences] │ sentences] │ sentences] │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PROOF POINT: [Metric, quote, or case study] │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CTA: [Clear next action] │ [Contact info] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Structure based on complexity:
| Complexity | Components | Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 3-5 | Single-view diagram with step annotations |
| Medium | 5-10 | Zoomable canvas with step-by-step walkthrough |
| Complex | 10+ | Multi-layer view (overview → detailed) with guided tour |
Standard elements:
[Scenario Name] — Powered by [Seller Product]All content should:
Headline: "[Prospect's Goal] with [Seller's Product]"
Subhead: Tie to their stated priority or top industry challenge
Metrics: 3-4 key facts about the prospect (shows we did homework)
Reference specific pain points from conversation:
- Use their exact words where possible
- Show we listened and understood
- Connect each to how we help
For each pain point:
├── The challenge (in their words)
├── How [Product] addresses it
├── Proof point or example
└── Outcome / benefit
3-5 relevant use cases:
├── Visual mockup or interactive demo
├── Business impact (quantified if possible)
├── "How it works" — 3-4 step summary
└── Relevant to their industry/role
Interactive calculator with:
├── Inputs relevant to their business (from research)
│ ├── Number of users/developers
│ ├── Current costs or time spent
│ └── Expected improvement %
├── Outputs:
│ ├── Annual value / savings
│ ├── Cost of solution
│ ├── Net ROI
│ └── Payback period
└── Assumptions clearly stated (editable)
├── Differentiators vs. alternatives they might consider
├── Trust, security, compliance positioning
├── Support and partnership model
└── Customer proof points (logos, quotes, case studies)
├── Clear action aligned to Purpose (c)
├── Specific next step (not vague "let's chat")
├── Contact information
├── Suggested timeline
└── What happens after they take action
For each system, define:
component:
id: "snowflake"
label: "Snowflake Data Warehouse"
type: "database" # database | api | ai | middleware | human | document | output
icon: "database"
description: "Financial performance data"
brand_color: "#29B5E8"
Component types:
human — Person initiating or receivingdocument — PDFs, contracts, filesai — AI/ML models, agentsdatabase — Data stores, warehousesapi — APIs, servicesmiddleware — Integration platforms, MCP serversoutput — Dashboards, reports, notificationsFor each step, define:
step:
number: 1
from: "human"
to: "claude"
action: "Initiates performance review"
description: "Sarah, a Brand Analyst at [Prospect], kicks off the quarterly review..."
data_example: "Review request: Nike brand, Q4 2025"
duration: "~1 second"
value_note: "No manual data gathering required"
Write a clear, specific walkthrough:
Step 1: Human Trigger
"Sarah, a Brand Performance Analyst at Centric Brands, needs to review
Q4 performance for the Nike license agreement. She opens the review
dashboard and clicks 'Start Review'..."
Step 2: Contract Analysis
"Claude retrieves the Nike contract PDF and extracts the performance
obligations: minimum $50M revenue, 12% margin requirement, quarterly
reporting deadline..."
Step 3: Data Query
"Claude formulates a query and sends it to Workato DataGenie:
'Get Q4 2025 revenue and gross margin for Nike brand from Snowflake'..."
Step 4: Results & Synthesis
"Snowflake returns the data. Claude compares actuals vs. obligations:
Revenue $52.3M ✓ (exceedeMake data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
jezweb/claude-skills
create-an-asset reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
create-an-asset has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend create-an-asset for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for create-an-asset matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: create-an-asset is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
create-an-asset fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in create-an-asset — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for create-an-asset matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
We added create-an-asset from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
create-an-asset has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 70