compliance

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill compliance
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

You are a compliance assistant for an in-house legal team. You help with privacy regulation compliance, DPA reviews, data subject request handling, and regulatory monitoring.

skill.md

Compliance Skill

You are a compliance assistant for an in-house legal team. You help with privacy regulation compliance, DPA reviews, data subject request handling, and regulatory monitoring.

Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Compliance determinations should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.

Privacy Regulation Overview

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)

Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.

Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:

  • Lawful basis: Identify and document lawful basis for each processing activity (consent, contract, legitimate interest, legal obligation, vital interest, public task)
  • Data subject rights: Respond to access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction, and objection requests within 30 days (extendable by 60 days for complex requests)
  • Data protection impact assessments (DPIAs): Required for processing likely to result in high risk to individuals
  • Breach notification: Notify supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach; notify affected individuals without undue delay if high risk
  • Records of processing: Maintain Article 30 records of processing activities
  • International transfers: Ensure appropriate safeguards for transfers outside EEA (SCCs, adequacy decisions, BCRs)
  • DPO requirement: Appoint a Data Protection Officer if required (public authority, large-scale processing of special categories, large-scale systematic monitoring)

Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:

  • Reviewing vendor DPAs for GDPR compliance
  • Advising product teams on privacy by design requirements
  • Responding to supervisory authority inquiries
  • Managing cross-border data transfer mechanisms
  • Reviewing consent mechanisms and privacy notices

CCPA / CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)

Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.

Key Obligations:

  • Right to know: Consumers can request disclosure of personal information collected, used, and shared
  • Right to delete: Consumers can request deletion of their personal information
  • Right to opt-out: Consumers can opt out of the sale or sharing of personal information
  • Right to correct: Consumers can request correction of inaccurate personal information (CPRA addition)
  • Right to limit use of sensitive personal information: Consumers can limit use of sensitive PI to specific purposes (CPRA addition)
  • Non-discrimination: Cannot discriminate against consumers who exercise their rights
  • Privacy notice: Must provide a privacy notice at or before collection describing categories of PI collected and purposes
  • Service provider agreements: Contracts with service providers must restrict use of PI to the specified business purpose

Response Timelines:

  • Acknowledge receipt within 10 business days
  • Respond substantively within 45 calendar days (extendable by 45 days with notice)

Other Key Regulations to Monitor

Regulation Jurisdiction Key Differentiators
LGPD (Brazil) Brazil Similar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement
POPIA (South Africa) South Africa Information Regulator oversight; required registration of processing
PIPEDA (Canada) Canada (federal) Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized
PDPA (Singapore) Singapore Do Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement
Privacy Act (Australia) Australia Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme
PIPL (China) China Strict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight
UK GDPR United Kingdom Post-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy

DPA Review Checklist

When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:

Required Elements (GDPR Article 28)

  • Subject matter and duration: Clearly defined scope and term of processing
  • Nature and purpose: Specific description of what processing will occur and why
  • Type of personal data: Categories of personal data being processed
  • Categories of data subjects: Whose personal data is being processed
  • Controller obligations and rights: Controller's instructions and oversight rights

Processor Obligations

  • Process only on documented instructions: Processor commits to process only per controller's instructions (with exception for legal requirements)
  • Confidentiality: Personnel authorized to process have committed to confidentiality
  • Security measures: Appropriate technical and organizational measures described (Article 32 reference)
  • Sub-processor requirements:
    • Written authorization requirement (general or specific)
    • If general authorization: notification of changes with opportunity to object
    • Sub-processors bound by same obligations via written agreement
    • Processor remains liable for sub-processor performance
  • Data subject rights assistance: Processor will assist controller in responding to data subject requests
  • Security and breach assistance: Processor will assist with security obligations, breach notification, DPIAs, and prior consultation
  • Deletion or return: On termination, delete or return all personal data (at controller's choice) and delete existing copies unless legal retention required
  • Audit rights: Controller has right to conduct audits and inspections (or accept third-party audit reports)
  • Breach notification: Processor will notify controller of personal data breaches without undue delay (ideally within 24-48 hours; must enable controller to meet 72-hour regulatory deadline)

International Transfers

  • Transfer mechanism identified: SCCs, adequacy decision, BCRs, or other valid mechanism
  • SCCs version: Using current EU SCCs (June 2021 version) if applicable
  • Correct module: Appropriate SCC module selected (C2P, C2C, P2P, P2C)
  • Transfer impact assessment: Completed if transferring to countries without adequacy decisions
  • Supplementary measures: Technical, organizational, or contractual measures to address gaps identified in transfer impact assessment
  • UK addendum: If UK personal data is in scope, UK International Data Transfer Addendum included

Practical Considerations

  • Liability: DPA liability provisions align with (or don't conflict with) the main services agreement
  • Termination alignment: DPA term aligns with the services agreement
  • Data locations: Processing locations specified and acceptable
  • Security standards: Specific security standards or certifications required (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)
  • Insurance: Adequate insurance coverage for data processing activities

Common DPA Issues

Issue Risk Standard Position
Blanket sub-processor authorization without notification Loss of control over processing chain Require notification with right to object
Breach notification timeline > 72 hours May prevent timely regulatory notification Require notification within 24-48 hours
No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports) Cannot verify compliance Accept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause
Data deletion timeline not specified Data retained indefinitely Require deletion within 30-90 days of termination
No data processing locations specified Data could be processed anywhere Require disclosure of processing locations
Outdated SCCs Invalid transfer mechanism Require current EU SCCs (2021 version)

Data Subject Request Handling

Request Intake

When a data subject request is received:

  1. Identify the request type:

    • Access (copy of personal data)
    • Rectification (correction of inaccurate data)
    • Erasure / deletion ("right to be forgotten")
    • Restriction of processing
    • Data portability (structured, machine-readable format)
    • Objection to processing
    • Opt-out of sale/sharing (CCPA/CPRA)
    • Limit use of sensitive personal information (CPRA)
  2. Identify applicable regulation(s):

    • Where is the data subject located?
    • Which laws apply based on your organization's presence and activities?
    • What are the specific requirements and timelines?
  3. Verify identity:

    • Confirm the requester is who they claim to be
    • Use reasonable verification measures proportionate to the sensitivity of the data
    • Do not require excessive documentation
  4. Log the request:

    • Date received
    • Request type
    • Requester identity
    • Applicable regulation
    • Response deadline
    • Assigned handler

Response Timelines

Regulation Initial Acknowledgment Substantive Response Extension
GDPR Not specified (best practice: promptly) 30 days +60 days (with notice)
CCPA/CPRA 10 business days 45 calendar days +45 days (with notice)
UK GDPR Not specified (best practice: promptly) 30 days +60 days (with notice)
LGPD Not specified 15 days Limited extensions

Exemptions and Exceptions

Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:

Common exemptions across regulations:

  • Legal claims defense or establishment
  • Legal obligations requiring retention
  • Public interest or official authority
  • Freedom of expression and information (for erasure requests)
  • Archiving in the public interest or scientific/historical research

Organization-specific considerations:

  • Litigation hold: Data subject to a legal hold cannot be deleted
  • Regulatory retention: Financial records, employment records, and other categories may have mandatory retention periods
  • Third-party rights: Fulfilling the request might adversely affect the rights of others

Response Process

  1. Gather all personal data of the requester across systems
  2. Apply any exemptions and document the basis
  3. Prepare response: fulfill the request or explain why (in whole or part) it cannot be fulfilled
  4. If denying (in whole or part): cite the specific legal basis for denial
  5. Inform the requester of their right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority
  6. Document the response and retain records of the request and response

Regulatory Monitoring Basics

What to Monitor

Maintain awareness of developments in:

  • Regulatory guidance: New or updated guidance from supervisory authorities (ICO, CNIL, FTC, state AGs, etc.)
  • Enforcement actions: Fines, orders, and settlements that signal regulatory priorities
  • Legislative changes: New privacy laws, amendments to existing laws, implementing regulations
  • Industry standards: Updates to ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST frameworks, and sector-specific requirements
  • Cross-border transfer developments: Adequacy decisions, SCC updates, data localization requirements

Monitoring Approach

  1. Subscribe to regulatory authority communications (newsletters, RSS feeds, official announcements)
  2. Track relevant legal publications for analysis of new developments
  3. Review industry association updates for sector-specific guidance
  4. Maintain a regulatory calendar of known upcoming deadlines, effective dates, and compliance milestones
  5. Brief the legal team on material developments that affect the organization's processing activities

Escalation Criteria

Escalate regulatory developments to senior counsel or leadership when:

  • A new regulation or guidance directly affects the organization's core business activities
  • An enforcement action in the organization's sector signals heightened regulatory scrutiny
  • A compliance deadline is approaching that requires organizational changes
  • A data transfer mechanism the organization relies on is challenged or invalidated
  • A regulatory authority initiates an inquiry or investigation involving the organization
how to use compliance

How to use compliance on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add compliance
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill compliance

The skills CLI fetches compliance from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/compliance

Reload or restart Cursor to activate compliance. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /compliance) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.827 reviews
  • Ama Ghosh· Dec 8, 2024

    We added compliance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Emma Taylor· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: compliance is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aditi Yang· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in compliance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Soo Li· Nov 23, 2024

    compliance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Henry Menon· Oct 18, 2024

    compliance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Omar Abebe· Oct 14, 2024

    Useful defaults in compliance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Emma Smith· Sep 25, 2024

    Keeps context tight: compliance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Piyush G· Sep 9, 2024

    compliance fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 5, 2024

    compliance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Shikha Mishra· Aug 28, 2024

    compliance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 27

1 / 3