pitch-deck▌
anthropics/financial-services-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Read all reference files at task start before beginning any work. These contain critical patterns and anti-patterns that will affect your approach. Do not wait until you encounter issues.
Populating Investment Banking Pitch Deck Templates
Reference Files
Read all reference files at task start before beginning any work. These contain critical patterns and anti-patterns that will affect your approach. Do not wait until you encounter issues.
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
formatting-standards.md |
Text, bullets, tables, charts, alignment |
slide-templates.md |
Content mapping guidance for common slide types |
xml-reference.md |
PowerPoint XML patterns for tables, shapes, arrows |
calculation-standards.md |
Financial formulas for verification (CAGR, consensus) |
Workflow Decision Tree
What type of task is this?
┌─ Populating empty template with source data?
│ └─→ Follow "Template Population Workflow" below
│
├─ Editing existing populated slides?
│ └─→ Extract current content, modify, revalidate
│
└─ Fixing formatting issues on existing slides?
└─→ See "Common Failures" table, apply targeted fixes
⚠️ Critical Rendering Limitation
LibreOffice is used for validation but DOES NOT render PowerPoint files accurately. It will mangle fonts, gradients, shape positions, text wrapping, and some table formatting.
What this means: A slide that passes visual validation in LibreOffice may still have issues in Microsoft PowerPoint. The validation loop catches structural issues (missing content, broken tables, placeholder formatting retained) but cannot catch font substitution, subtle alignment shifts, or gradient problems.
Required action: Always include this statement when delivering output:
"This file was validated using LibreOffice. Please review in Microsoft PowerPoint before distribution, as rendering differences may exist."
Template Population Workflow
Copy and track progress:
Pitch Deck Progress:
- [ ] Phase 1: Extract and validate source data
- [ ] Phase 2: Map content to template sections
- [ ] Phase 3: Populate slides with proper formatting
- [ ] Phase 4: Validate → Fix → Repeat until clean
- [ ] Phase 5: Final verification
Phase 1: Data Extraction
- Create backup of original template before any modifications — copy to
[filename]_backup.pptx. Direct XML editing or unexpected errors can corrupt files. - Identify all source materials (Excel, CSV, PDF reports, Word documents, databases, web sources)
- Extract relevant data points from each source
- Validate all numbers against original sources
- Standardize units and currency (convert all figures to the primary unit/currency used in the template)
- Note any calculations that need verification → see
calculation-standards.mdfor formulas
Phase 2: Content Mapping
- Open and visually review the template — understand its structure, style, and existing content before modifying
- Analyze template structure — identify all placeholder areas and content boxes
- Map source data to corresponding template sections → see
slide-templates.mdfor mapping guidance - Identify placeholder guidance boxes (colored instruction boxes from task creator)
- Note any data gaps or mismatches → see
slide-templates.mdfor resolution
Phase 3: Template Population
- Remove or reformat placeholder boxes — colored instruction boxes show WHAT to create, not HOW to format. Delete them and create properly formatted content in their place. See Critical Anti-Patterns.
- Populate each section with mapped content (focus on content first)
- Then apply formatting to match template style → see
formatting-standards.md - Create tables as actual table objects (NEVER use pipe/tab-separated text) → see
xml-reference.md - Create arrows/shapes as PowerPoint objects → see
xml-reference.md - Insert company logo if provided in task files; if not available, flag to user: "[LOGO NOT PROVIDED - please supply company logo]"
Phase 4: Validate → Fix → Repeat
This is a feedback loop. Repeat until all checks pass OR escalation is triggered.
# Convert to images for visual validation
soffice --headless --convert-to pdf presentation.pptx
pdftoppm -jpeg -r 150 presentation.pdf slide
Validation checklist (check each slide image):
- Text readable against background?
- Tables are actual objects (columns aligned, NOT pipe/tab-separated text)?
- Charts/tables fill designated areas?
- Bullet formatting consistent within sections?
- Font sizes match across same-level boxes?
- No content beyond slide boundaries?
- No placeholder formatting retained (no large colored boxes with data dumped in)?
- No text-based "tables" (no
|or tab separators creating fake columns)? - Cross-slide consistency: Same metrics/figures identical across all slides where they appear?
Fix cycle protocol:
| Cycle | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Fix all identified issues, re-validate |
| 2 | Fix remaining issues, re-validate |
| 3 | If issues persist, document remaining problems and escalate to user |
After 3 cycles, if issues remain:
- List each unresolved issue with slide number and description
- Explain what was attempted
- Deliver the file with explicit disclaimer: "The following issues could not be resolved automatically: [list]. Manual review required."
Do not continue cycling indefinitely. Some issues (font rendering, complex shape alignment) may require manual intervention in PowerPoint.
Phase 5: Final Verification
Run through the Final Quality Checklist before delivering.
Quick Reference Tables
Bullet Symbols
| Context | Symbol | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Included/Positive | ✓ | Items within scope, features present |
| Excluded/Negative | × | Items outside scope, features absent |
| Neutral list | • | General enumeration, commentary |
| Numbered sequence | 1. 2. 3. | Process steps, rankings |
| Sub-bullets | – | Secondary points under main bullets |
Slide Hierarchy Levels (Typical)
These are typical ranges—adjust based on template specifications:
| Level | Examples | Typical Size | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | Slide title | 40-48pt | Bold |
| Subtitle | Market definition, slide descriptor | 18-22pt | Bold |
| Section Header | "Key Projections", "Commentary" | 14-16pt | Regular |
| Block Label | "Segments Included", "Definition" sidebar | 12-14pt | Regular |
| Block Content | Bullet points, body text | 11-14pt | Regular |
| Table Header | Column headers | 10-12pt | Bold |
| Table Body | Cell content | 9-11pt | Regular |
| Footnotes | Sources, notes | 8-9pt | Italic |
Font Consistency Matching
Boxes at the same hierarchy level MUST use identical font sizes:
| Same Level | Must Match With |
|---|---|
| "Segments Included" | "Segments Excluded" |
| "Definition" | "Scope Rationale" |
| Left column bullets | Right column bullets |
| All block labels | Each other |
| All section headers | Each other |
Rounding for Presentation
These are typical conventions — adjust based on the magnitude of values and template style:
| Value Type | Typical Rounding | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Large market sizes ($10bn+) | Nearest $1bn | 18.5 → $19bn |
| Smaller market sizes (<$10bn) | Nearest $0.5bn or $0.1bn | 2.3 → $2.5bn |
| Size ranges | Match precision of sources | 14.9-22.1 → $15-22bn |
| CAGR | Whole % or 0.5% | 16.4% → 16% or 16.5% |
| Market share | Nearest 5% or match source | 21.4% → 20% |
| Multiples | 1 decimal | 9.69 → 9.7x |
Principle: Rounding should not materially change the figure. For smaller values, use finer precision.
Text Density Rules
- Max 6-7 bullets per content box
- Max 2 lines per bullet point
- Parenthetical examples: same line or indented below
- No orphan words (single word on new line)
Alignment Principles
Vertically stacked boxes must have identical:
- Left margin position, bullet indentation, text start position, box width
Horizontally adjacent boxes must have identical:
- Top position, height (where possible), internal padding
Multi-Slide Consistency
When the same data appears on multiple slides:
- Use identical figures, formatting, and terminology
- If a metric is updated on one slide, update all occurrences
- Cross-reference during validation to catch mismatches
MUST Requirements
These requirements are non-negotiable regardless of template:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Text Readability | All text MUST have sufficient contrast with background. Examples: white/light text on dark blue, dark green, black backgrounds; black/dark text on white, light gray, light yellow backgrounds. |
| Actual Table Objects | Tabular data MUST be table objects, not tab-separated text. See xml-reference.md. |
| Proper Chart/Table Sizing | Pasted visuals MUST fill designated area. See formatting-standards.md. |
| Consistent Formatting | Bullets within section MUST match (symbol, size, indent). Same-level boxes MUST use same font size. |
| Content Boundaries | All content MUST stay within slide edges. Footnote box width: ~32.5cm for 16:9, ~24cm for 4:3. |
| No Placeholder Formatting | Remove colored instruction boxes. Main body: dark text on light background per template. |
Critical Anti-Patterns: NEVER DO THESE
These failures occur when placeholder formatting is mistaken for output formatting. Recognizing these patterns is essential.
Anti-Pattern 1: Populating Data INTO Placeholder Boxes
What happens: Template has colored instruction boxes (yellow, orange, etc.) with guidance text. Model replaces the guidance text with actual data BUT KEEPS THE COLORED BOX.
Why it's wrong: The colored box IS the placeholder. It tells you what content goes there. The output should have different formatting — typically dark text on white/light background, or properly styled shapes.
Recognition test: If your populated slide has large colored rectangles filled with data text, you have copied the placeholder format instead of replacing it.
Critical distinction — two types of "placeholders":
| Type | How to identify | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction boxes | Bright colors (yellow, orange), contains guidance text like "Insert X here", white/light text on colored background | DELETE the entire shape, then create new content with production formatting |
| Layout placeholders | Part of slide master/layout, neutral colors matching template theme, "Click to add text" | KEEP the shape, REPLACE the text content only |
If uncertain: check if the shape exists on an empty slide from the same template. Layout placeholders persist; instruction boxes are regular shapes.
Anti-Pattern 2: Text-Based "Tables"
What happens: Model creates table-like content using separator characters (|, tabs, spaces) instead of actual table objects.
Why it's wrong: This is NOT a table. Columns will never align properly, it cannot be formatted consistently, and it looks unprofessional.
Recognition test: If you're typing | characters or relying on spaces/tabs to create columns, you're creating text, not a table.
MUST verify: After creating any table, verify it is an actual table object. See xml-reference.md for verification methods.
Anti-Pattern 3: Inheriting Placeholder Contrast
What happens: Placeholder uses light text on colored background (e.g., white on yellow). Model populates data but keeps this color scheme, resulting in hard-to-read output.
Why it's wrong: Placeholder colors are deliberately distinct to signal "replace me." Production slides typically use dark text on light backgrounds for body content.
Recognition test: If your populated content has light/white text on bright colored backgrounds in body areas (not headers), you've inherited placeholder formatting.
Correct approach: Apply production formatting — typically dark text (#000000 or #333333) on white or light backgrounds for body content. Headers and accent areas may use brand colors.
Summary: Placeholder vs. Production
| Element | Placeholder (Input) | Production (Output) |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction boxes | Colored background, guidance text | Removed or reformatted |
| Data areas | "[Insert data here]" text | Actual data with clean formatting |
| Tables | Description of what table should contain | Actual table object with rows/columns |
| Body text | Light text on colored background | Dark text on light background |
The placeholder tells you WHAT to create, not HOW to format it.
Common Failures
For detailed explanations of the most critical failures, see Critical Anti-Patterns above.
| Failure | Solution | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Unstructured text dumps | Break into bullets (✓, ×, •) | formatting-standards.md |
| Pipe/tab-separated "tables" | Create actual table objects — text with separators is NOT a table | xml-reference.md |
| Poor text/background contrast | Audit every text element | — |
| Tiny pasted charts | Resize to fill area, paste chart only | formatting-standards.md |
| Source data pasted with charts | Select only chart object before copy | — |
| Data dumped into placeholder boxes | Delete colored instruction boxes, create new properly formatted content | Anti-Patterns |
| Inconsistent bullets | Define style once, apply to all | formatting-standards.md |
| Inconsistent fonts across boxes | Standardize same-level boxes | formatting-standards.md |
| Content overflow | Set explicit box widths (footnotes: 32.5cm for 16:9, 24cm for 4:3) | — |
| Missing logo | Use logo from task files; if not provided, flag to user | — |
Remaining [brackets] |
Search and replace all placeholders | — |
| Text arrows (→, ⟹) | Use PowerPoint shape objects | xml-reference.md |
Error Handling
If PDF/image conversion fails:
- Check LibreOffice is installed:
which soffice - Try alternative:
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf presentation.pptx - If still failing, open in PowerPoint/LibreOffice manually and export
If source data has inconsistencies or conflicts:
- Priority order: Use data explicitly provided in the task files first
- If using data from other sources (web search, external documents), flag this to the user
- Document any discrepancies explicitly
- Add footnote explaining data source choice
If calculations do
How to use pitch-deck on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pitch-deck
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches pitch-deck from GitHub repository anthropics/financial-services-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate pitch-deck. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pitch-deck) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★51 reviews- ★★★★★Ama Gonzalez· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pitch-deck is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Xiao Flores· Dec 16, 2024
pitch-deck is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Maya Huang· Dec 12, 2024
pitch-deck has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Tandon· Nov 19, 2024
pitch-deck fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kiara Abbas· Nov 11, 2024
Registry listing for pitch-deck matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024
pitch-deck fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Anaya Nasser· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: pitch-deck is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 26, 2024
pitch-deck has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Johnson· Oct 26, 2024
We added pitch-deck from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ama Sanchez· Oct 10, 2024
pitch-deck has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 51