$22
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncommand-developmentExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches command-development from anthropics/claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate command-development. Access via /command-development in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
110.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
110.1K
stars
Slash commands are frequently-used prompts defined as Markdown files that Claude executes during interactive sessions. Understanding command structure, frontmatter options, and dynamic features enables creating powerful, reusable workflows.
Key concepts:
A slash command is a Markdown file containing a prompt that Claude executes when invoked. Commands provide:
Commands are written for agent consumption, not human consumption.
When a user invokes /command-name, the command content becomes Claude's instructions. Write commands as directives TO Claude about what to do, not as messages TO the user.
Correct approach (instructions for Claude):
Review this code for security vulnerabilities including:
- SQL injection
- XSS attacks
- Authentication issues
Provide specific line numbers and severity ratings.
Incorrect approach (messages to user):
This command will review your code for security issues.
You'll receive a report with vulnerability details.
The first example tells Claude what to do. The second tells the user what will happen but doesn't instruct Claude. Always use the first approach.
Project commands (shared with team):
.claude/commands//helpPersonal commands (available everywhere):
~/.claude/commands//helpPlugin commands (bundled with plugins):
plugin-name/commands//helpCommands are Markdown files with .md extension:
.claude/commands/
├── review.md # /review command
├── test.md # /test command
└── deploy.md # /deploy command
Simple command:
Review this code for security vulnerabilities including:
- SQL injection
- XSS attacks
- Authentication bypass
- Insecure data handling
No frontmatter needed for basic commands.
Add configuration using YAML frontmatter:
---
description: Review code for security issues
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Bash(git:*)
model: sonnet
---
Review this code for security vulnerabilities...
Purpose: Brief description shown in /help
Type: String
Default: First line of command prompt
---
description: Review pull request for code quality
---
Best practice: Clear, actionable description (under 60 characters)
Purpose: Specify which tools command can use Type: String or Array Default: Inherits from conversation
---
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(git:*)
---
Patterns:
Read, Write, Edit - Specific toolsBash(git:*) - Bash with git commands only* - All tools (rarely needed)Use when: Command requires specific tool access
Purpose: Specify model for command execution Type: String (sonnet, opus, haiku) Default: Inherits from conversation
---
model: haiku
---
Use cases:
haiku - Fast, simple commandssonnet - Standard workflowsopus - Complex analysisPurpose: Document expected arguments for autocomplete Type: String Default: None
---
argument-hint: [pr-number] [priority] [assignee]
---
Benefits:
Purpose: Prevent SlashCommand tool from programmatically calling command Type: Boolean Default: false
---
disable-model-invocation: true
---
Use when: Command should only be manually invoked
Capture all arguments as single string:
---
description: Fix issue by number
argument-hint: [issue-number]
---
Fix issue #$ARGUMENTS following our coding standards and best practices.
Usage:
> /fix-issue 123
> /fix-issue 456
Expands to:
Fix issue #123 following our coding standards...
Fix issue #456 following our coding standards...
Capture individual arguments with $1, $2, $3, etc.:
---
description: Review PR with priority and assignee
argument-hint: [pr-number] [priority] [assignee]
---
Review pull request #$1 with priority level $2.
After review, assign to $3 for follow-up.
Usage:
> /review-pr 123 high alice
Expands to:
Review pull request #123 with priority level high.
After review, assign to alice for follow-up.
Mix positional and remaining arguments:
Deploy $1 to $2 environment with options: $3
Usage:
> /deploy api staging --force --skip-tests
Expands to:
Deploy api to staging environment with options: --force --skip-tests
Include file contents in command:
---
description: Review specific file
argument-hint: [file-path]
---
Review @$1 for:
- Code quality
- Best practices
- Potential bugs
Usage:
> /review-file src/api/users.ts
Effect: Claude reads src/api/users.ts before processing command
Reference multiple files:
Compare @src/old-version.js with @src/new-version.js
Identify:
- Breaking changes
- New features
- Bug fixes
Reference known files without arguments:
Review @package.json and @tsconfig.json for consistency
Ensure:
- TypeScript version matches
- Dependencies are aligned
- Build configuration is correct
Commands can execute bash commands inline to dynamically gather context before Claude processes the command. This is useful for including repository state, environment information, or project-specific context.
When to use:
Implementation details:
For complete syntax, examples, and best practices, see references/plugin-features-reference.md section on bash execution. The reference includes the exact syntax and multiple working examples to avoid execution issues
Simple organization for small command sets:
.claude/commands/
├── build.md
├── test.md
├── deploy.md
├── review.md
└── docs.md
Use when: 5-15 commands, no clear categories
Organize commands in subdirectories:
.claude/commands/
├── ci/
│ ├── build.md # /build (project:ci)
│ ├── test.md # /test (project:ci)
│ └── lint.md # /lint (project:ci)
├── git/
│ ├── commit.md # /commit (project:git)
│ └── pr.md # /pr (project:git)
└── docs/
├── generate.md # /generate (project:docs)
└── publish.md # /publish (project:docs)
Benefits:
/helpUse when: 15+ commands, clear categories
/helpallowed-tools when neededargument-hint---
argument-hint: [pr-number]
---
$IF($1,
Review PR #$1,
Please provide a PR number. Usage: /review-pr [number]
)
Bash(git:*) not Bash(*)---
description: Deploy application to environment
argument-hint: [environment] [version]
---
<!--
Usage: /deploy [staging|production] [version]
Requires: AWS credentials configured
Example: /deploy staging v1.2.3
-->
Deploy application to $1 environment using version $2...
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
frontend-design
634anthropics/claude-code
Frontendsame reporoblox-game-development
93greedychipmunk/agent-skills
Productivitytag: developmentgrill-me
650mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.8★★★★★28 reviews- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: command-development is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- JJames Taylor★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for command-development matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- LLi Verma★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in command-development — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- SSakshi Patil★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
We added command-development from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- KKabir Perez★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
I recommend command-development for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
command-development fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAnaya Thompson★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
Registry listing for command-development matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- LLucas Verma★★★★★Aug 4, 2024
command-development reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- JJames Sethi★★★★★Jul 23, 2024
I recommend command-development for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Jul 7, 2024
command-development is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 28
1 / 3Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.