super-swarm-spark

am-will/codex-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/am-will/codex-skills --skill super-swarm-spark
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Orchestrates parallel task execution across up to 12 concurrent Sparky subagents using a rolling pool scheduler.

  • Parses markdown plan files, extracts task definitions, and launches subagents continuously as slots open without waiting for batch completion
  • Maintains canonical file paths and naming constraints across parallel tasks to prevent filename drift and cross-task conflicts
  • Validates each subagent result, updates the plan file with completion logs, and immediately schedules the
skill.md

Parallel Task Executor (Sparky Rolling 12-Agent Pool)

You are an Orchestrator for subagents. Parse plan files and delegate tasks in parallel using a rolling pool of up to 15 concurrent Sparky subagents. Keep launching new work whenever a slot opens until the plan is fully complete.

Primary orchestration goals:

  • Keep the project moving continuously
  • Ignore dependency maps
  • Keep up to 15 agents running whenever pending work exists
  • Give every subagent maximum path/file context
  • Prevent filename/folder-name drift across parallel tasks
  • Check every subagent result
  • Ensure the plan file is updated as tasks complete
  • Perform final integration fixes after all task execution
  • Add/adjust tests, then run tests and fix failures

Process

Step 1: Parse Request

Extract from user request:

  1. Plan file: The markdown plan to read
  2. Task subset (optional): Specific task IDs to run

If no subset provided, run the full plan.

Step 2: Read & Parse Plan

  1. Find task subsections (e.g., ### T1: or ### Task 1.1:)
  2. For each task, extract:
    • Task ID and name
    • Task linkage metadata for context only
    • Full content (description, location, acceptance criteria, validation)
  3. Build task list
  4. If a task subset was requested, filter to only those IDs.

Step 3: Build Context Pack Per Task

Before launching a task, prepare a context pack that includes:

  • Canonical file paths and folder paths the task must touch
  • Planned new filenames (exact names, not suggestions)
  • Neighboring tasks that touch the same files/folders
  • Naming constraints and conventions from the plan/repo
  • Any known cross-task expectations that could cause conflicts

Rules:

  • Do not allow subagents to invent alternate file names for the same intent.
  • Require explicit file targets in every subagent assignment.
  • If a subagent needs a new file not in its context pack, it must report this before creating it.

Step 4: Launch Subagents (Rolling Pool, Max 12)

Run a rolling scheduler:

  • States: pending, running, completed, failed
  • Launch up to 12 tasks immediately (or fewer if less are pending)
  • Whenever any running task finishes, validate/update plan for that task, then launch the next pending task immediately
  • Continue until no pending or running tasks remain

For each launched task, use:

  • agent_type: sparky (Sparky role)
  • description: "Implement task [ID]: [name]"
  • prompt: Use template below

Do not wait for grouped batches. The only concurrency limit is 12 active Sparky subagents.

Every launch must set agent_type: sparky. Any other role is invalid for this skill.

Task Prompt Template

You are implementing a specific task from a development plan.

## Context
- Plan: [filename]
- Goals: [relevant overview from plan]
- Task relationships: [related metadata for awareness only, never as a blocker]
- Canonical folders: [exact folders to use]
- Canonical files to edit: [exact paths]
- Canonical files to create: [exact paths]
- Shared-touch files: [files touched by other tasks in parallel]
- Naming rules: [repo/plan naming constraints]
- Constraints: [risks from plan]

## Your Task
**Task [ID]: [Name]**

Location: [File paths]
Description: [Full description]

Acceptance Criteria:
[List from plan]

Validation:
[Tests or verification from plan]

## Instructions
- Use the `sparky` agent role for this task; do not use any other role.
1. Examine the plan and all listed canonical paths before editing
2. Implement changes for all acceptance criteria
3. Keep work atomic and committable
4. For each file: read first, edit carefully, preserve formatting
5. Do not create alternate filename variants; use only the provided canonical names
6. If you need to touch/create a path not listed, stop and report it first
7. Run validation if feasible
8. ALWAYS mark completed tasks IN THE *-plan.md file AS SOON AS YOU COMPLETE IT! and update with:
   - Concise work log
   - Files modified/created
   - Errors or gotchas encountered
9. Commit your work
   - Note: There are other agents working in parallel to you, so only stage and commit the files you worked on. NEVER PUSH. ONLY COMMIT.
10. Double check that you updated the *-plan.md file and committed your work before yielding
11. Return summary of:
   - Files modified/created (exact paths)
   - Changes made
   - How criteria are satisfied
   - Validation performed or deferred

## Important
- Be careful with paths
- Follow canonical naming exactly
- Stop and describe blockers if encountered
- Focus on this specific task

Step 5: Validate Every Completion

As each subagent finishes:

  1. Inspect output for correctness and completeness.
  2. Validate against expected outcomes for that task.
  3. Ensure plan file completion state + logs were updated correctly.
  4. Retry/escalate on failure.
  5. Keep scheduler full: after validation, immediately launch the next pending task if a slot is open.

Step 6: Final Orchestrator Integration Pass

After all subagents are done:

  1. Reconcile parallel-work conflicts and cross-task breakage.
  2. Resolve duplicate/variant filenames and converge to canonical paths.
  3. Ensure the plan is fully and accurately updated.
  4. Add or adjust tests to cover integration/regression gaps.
  5. Run required tests.
  6. Fix failures.
  7. Re-run tests until green (or report explicit blockers with evidence).

Completion bar:

  • All plan tasks marked complete with logs
  • Integrated codebase builds/tests per plan expectations
  • No unresolved path/name divergence introduced by parallel execution

Scheduling Policy (Required)

  • Max concurrent subagents: 12
  • If pending tasks exist and running count is below 12: launch more immediately
  • Do not pause due to relationship metadata
  • Continue until the full plan (or requested subset) is complete and integrated

Error Handling

  • Task subset not found: List available task IDs
  • Parse failure: Show what was tried, ask for clarification
  • Path ambiguity across tasks: pick one canonical path, announce it, and enforce it in all task prompts

Example Usage

'Implement the plan using super-swarm'
/super-swarm-spark plan.md
/super-swarm-spark ./plans/auth-plan.md T1 T2 T4
/super-swarm-spark user-profile-plan.md --tasks T3 T7

Execution Summary Template

# Execution Summary

## Tasks Assigned: [N]

## Concurrency
- Max workers: 12
- Scheduling mode: rolling pool (continuous refill)

### Completed
- Task [ID]: [Name] - [Brief summary]

### Issues
- Task [ID]: [Name]
  - Issue: [What went wrong]
  - Resolution: [How resolved or what's needed]

### Blocked
- Task [ID]: [Name]
  - Blocker: [What's preventing completion]
  - Next Steps: [What needs to happen]

## Integration Fixes
- [Conflict or regression]: [Fix]

## Tests Added/Updated
- [Test file]: [Coverage added]

## Validation Run
- [Command]: [Pass/Fail + key output]

## Overall Status
[Completion summary]

## Files Modified
[List of changed files]

## Next Steps
[Recommendations]
how to use super-swarm-spark

How to use super-swarm-spark on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add super-swarm-spark
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/am-will/codex-skills --skill super-swarm-spark

The skills CLI fetches super-swarm-spark from GitHub repository am-will/codex-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/super-swarm-spark

Reload or restart Cursor to activate super-swarm-spark. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /super-swarm-spark) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.646 reviews
  • Layla Malhotra· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend super-swarm-spark for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Kofi Thompson· Dec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: super-swarm-spark is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 12, 2024

    super-swarm-spark fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Daniel Harris· Dec 8, 2024

    super-swarm-spark has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Tariq Johnson· Nov 27, 2024

    Keeps context tight: super-swarm-spark is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Piyush G· Nov 3, 2024

    Registry listing for super-swarm-spark matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 22, 2024

    super-swarm-spark reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Tariq Abbas· Oct 18, 2024

    super-swarm-spark is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Yuki Rao· Sep 25, 2024

    super-swarm-spark is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kofi Abbas· Sep 9, 2024

    super-swarm-spark reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 46

1 / 5