user-journeys▌
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Load with: base.md + playwright-testing.md
User Journeys Skill
Load with: base.md + playwright-testing.md
For defining and testing real user experiences - not just specs, but actual flows humans take through your application.
Philosophy
Specs test features. Journeys test experiences.
A feature can pass all specs but still deliver a terrible experience. User journeys capture:
- How users actually navigate (not how we think they should)
- Emotional states at each step (frustrated, confused, delighted)
- Recovery from mistakes (users will make them)
- Real-world conditions (slow networks, interruptions, distractions)
Journey Documentation Structure
_project_specs/
├── journeys/
│ ├── _template.md # Journey template
│ ├── critical/ # Must-work journeys (revenue, core value)
│ │ ├── signup-to-first-value.md
│ │ ├── checkout-purchase.md
│ │ └── login-to-dashboard.md
│ ├── common/ # Frequent user paths
│ │ ├── browse-and-search.md
│ │ ├── update-profile.md
│ │ └── invite-team-member.md
│ └── edge-cases/ # Error recovery, unusual paths
│ ├── payment-failure-retry.md
│ ├── session-timeout-recovery.md
│ └── offline-reconnection.md
Journey Template
# Journey: [Name]
## Overview
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Priority** | Critical / High / Medium |
| **User Type** | New / Returning / Admin |
| **Frequency** | Daily / Weekly / One-time |
| **Success Metric** | Conversion rate, time to complete, drop-off rate |
## User Goal
What is the user trying to accomplish? Write from their perspective.
> "I want to [goal] so that I can [benefit]."
## Preconditions
- User state (logged in, has subscription, first visit)
- Data state (has items in cart, has team members)
- Environment (mobile, desktop, slow connection)
## Journey Steps
### Step 1: [Entry Point]
**User Action:** What the user does
**System Response:** What they should see/experience
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] Page loads in < 2 seconds
- [ ] Primary CTA is immediately visible
- [ ] User understands what to do next
**Potential Friction:**
- Slow load time → Show skeleton/loader
- Unclear CTA → A/B test copy variations
---
### Step 2: [Next Action]
**User Action:** ...
**System Response:** ...
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] ...
**Potential Friction:**
- ...
---
## Error Scenarios
### E1: [Error Name]
**Trigger:** What causes this error
**User Sees:** Error message/state
**Recovery Path:** How user gets back on track
**Test:** How to verify recovery works
## Metrics to Track
- Time to complete journey
- Drop-off rate at each step
- Error rate and recovery rate
- User satisfaction (if surveyed)
## E2E Test Reference
Link to Playwright test: `e2e/tests/journeys/[name].spec.ts`
Critical Journey Examples
Signup to First Value
# Journey: Signup to First Value
## Overview
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Priority** | Critical |
| **User Type** | New |
| **Frequency** | One-time |
| **Success Metric** | % reaching "aha moment" within 5 min |
## User Goal
> "I want to try this product quickly to see if it solves my problem."
## Preconditions
- First visit to site
- No account
- Came from landing page or ad
## Journey Steps
### Step 1: Landing Page
**User Action:** Clicks "Get Started Free" or "Try Now"
**System Response:** Signup form appears (modal or new page)
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] CTA visible above fold
- [ ] No distracting elements
- [ ] Clear value proposition visible
**Potential Friction:**
- Too many form fields → Reduce to email + password only
- Social login missing → Add Google/GitHub options
### Step 2: Account Creation
**User Action:** Enters email and password (or uses social login)
**System Response:**
- Creates account
- Sends verification email (don't block on it)
- Redirects to onboarding
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] Account created in < 3 seconds
- [ ] No email verification wall (verify later)
- [ ] Clear next step shown
**Potential Friction:**
- Email already exists → Offer login link
- Weak password → Show requirements inline, not after submit
### Step 3: Onboarding (Quick Win)
**User Action:** Completes 1-2 setup questions
**System Response:**
- Personalizes experience
- Shows progress indicator
- Leads to first action
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] Max 3 questions
- [ ] Skip option available
- [ ] < 60 seconds total
**Potential Friction:**
- Too many questions → User abandons
- No skip option → User feels trapped
### Step 4: First Value (Aha Moment)
**User Action:** Completes core action (creates first X, sees first result)
**System Response:**
- Celebrates success
- Shows value delivered
- Suggests next step
**Success Criteria:**
- [ ] User experiences core value
- [ ] Completion feels rewarding
- [ ] Clear path to continue
## Error Scenarios
### E1: Email Already Registered
**Trigger:** User tries existing email
**User Sees:** "Already have an account? Log in or reset password"
**Recovery Path:** Click to login or reset
**Test:** `signup-existing-email.spec.ts`
### E2: Social Login Fails
**How to use user-journeys on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add user-journeys
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches user-journeys from GitHub repository alinaqi/claude-bootstrap and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate user-journeys. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /user-journeys) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★72 reviews- ★★★★★Yuki Khanna· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: user-journeys is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kofi Diallo· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for user-journeys matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: user-journeys is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Kofi Flores· Dec 8, 2024
user-journeys is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Hassan Mehta· Dec 8, 2024
user-journeys reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for user-journeys matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kofi Garcia· Nov 27, 2024
user-journeys reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ira Thomas· Nov 27, 2024
user-journeys is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Meera Park· Nov 19, 2024
We added user-journeys from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kofi Torres· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: user-journeys is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 72