causal-inference

Causal inference determines cause-and-effect relationships and estimates treatment effects, going beyond correlation to understand what causes what.

aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsUpdated Apr 8, 2026

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

161

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill causal-inference

0

installs

0

this week

161

stars

Installation Guide

How to use causal-inference on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add causal-inference
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill causal-inference

Fetches causal-inference from aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/causal-inference

Restart Cursor to activate causal-inference. Access via /causal-inference in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

Causal Inference

Overview

Causal inference determines cause-and-effect relationships and estimates treatment effects, going beyond correlation to understand what causes what.

When to Use

  • Evaluating the impact of policy interventions or business decisions
  • Estimating treatment effects when randomized experiments aren't feasible
  • Controlling for confounding variables in observational data
  • Determining if a marketing campaign or product change caused an outcome
  • Analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects across different user segments
  • Making causal claims from non-experimental data using propensity scores or instrumental variables

Key Concepts

  • Treatment: Intervention or exposure
  • Outcome: Result or consequence
  • Confounding: Variables affecting both treatment and outcome
  • Causal Graph: Visual representation of relationships
  • Treatment Effect: Impact of intervention
  • Selection Bias: Non-random treatment assignment

Causal Methods

  • Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT): Gold standard
  • Propensity Score Matching: Balance treatment/control
  • Difference-in-Differences: Before/after comparison
  • Instrumental Variables: Handle endogeneity
  • Causal Forests: Heterogeneous treatment effects

Implementation with Python

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from scipy import stats

# Generate observational data with confounding
np.random.seed(42)

n = 1000

# Confounder: Age (affects both treatment and outcome)
age = np.random.uniform(25, 75, n)

# Treatment: Training program (more likely for younger people)
treatment_prob = 0.3 + 0.3 * (75 - age) / 50  # Inverse relationship with age
treatment = (np.random.uniform(0, 1, n) < treatment_prob).astype(int)

# Outcome: Salary (affected by both treatment and age)
# True causal effect of treatment: +$5000
salary = 40000 + 500 * age + 5000 * treatment + np.random.normal(0, 10000, n)

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'age': age,
    'treatment': treatment,
    'salary': salary,
})

print("Observational Data Summary:")
print(df.describe())
print(f"\nTreatment Rate: {df['treatment'].mean():.1%}")
print(f"Average Salary (Control): ${df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
print(f"Average Salary (Treatment): ${df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean():.0f}")

# 1. Naive Comparison (BIASED - ignores confounding)
naive_effect = df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean() - df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean()
print(f"\n1. Naive Comparison: ${naive_effect:.0f} (BIASED)")

# 2. Regression Adjustment (Covariate Adjustment)
X = df[['treatment', 'age']]
y = df['salary']
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
regression_effect = model.coef_[0]

print(f"\n2. Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:.0f}")

# 3. Propensity Score Matching
# Estimate probability of treatment given covariates
ps_model = LogisticRegression()
ps_model.fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
df['propensity_score'] = ps_model.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]

print(f"\n3. Propensity Score Matching:")
print(f"PS range: [{df['propensity_score'].min():.3f}, {df['propensity_score'].max():.3f}]")

# Matching: find control for each treated unit
matched_pairs = []
treated_units = df[df['treatment'] == 1].index
for treated_idx in treated_units:
    treated_ps = df.loc[treated_idx, 'propensity_score']
    treated_age = df.loc[treated_idx, 'age']

    # Find closest control unit
    control_units = df[(df['treatment'] == 0) &
                      (df['propensity_score'] >= treated_ps - 0.1) &
                      (df['propensity_score'] <= treated_ps + 0.1)].index

    if len(control_units) > 0:
        closest_control = min(control_units,
                             key=lambda x: abs(df.loc[x, 'propensity_score'] - treated_ps))
        matched_pairs.append({
            'treated_idx': treated_idx,
            'control_idx': closest_control,
            'treated_salary': df.loc[treated_idx, 'salary'],
            'control_salary': df.loc[closest_control, 'salary'],
        })

matched_df = pd.DataFrame(matched_pairs)
psm_effect = (matched_df['treated_salary'] - matched_df['control_salary']).mean(

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Steps

  1. 1Install product management skill
  2. 2Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.670 reviews
  • D
    Diego KhanDec 24, 2024

    causal-inference fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • A
    Ava KimDec 24, 2024

    We added causal-inference from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • G
    Ganesh MohaneDec 20, 2024

    We added causal-inference from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • M
    Mia ChenDec 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: causal-inference is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • E
    Evelyn KimDec 20, 2024

    causal-inference reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • A
    Ava OkaforNov 15, 2024

    I recommend causal-inference for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • D
    Diego MartinNov 15, 2024

    causal-inference reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • R
    Rahul SantraNov 11, 2024

    causal-inference reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • A
    Arjun OkaforNov 11, 2024

    causal-inference is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • N
    Naina TaylorNov 11, 2024

    We added causal-inference from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 70

1 / 7

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.