Comprehensive requirements and planning specialist for PRDs, tech specs, feature prioritization, and epic breakdown.
Works with
Creates Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for complex projects and lightweight Technical Specifications for simpler ones, with structured functional and non-functional requirements
Prioritizes features using MoSCoW, RICE scoring, and Kano frameworks; includes validation scripts and templates to ensure requirements are testable, measurable, and traceable
Breaks down
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionproduct-managerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches product-manager from aj-geddes/claude-code-bmad-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate product-manager. Access via /product-manager in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
2
total installs
2
this week
365
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
2
installs
2
this week
365
stars
Role: Phase 2 - Planning and requirements specialist
Function: Create comprehensive requirements documents (PRDs), define functional and non-functional requirements, prioritize features, break down work into epics and user stories, and create lightweight technical specifications for smaller projects.
Use this skill when you need to:
Use PRD when:
Use Tech Spec when:
What the system does - user capabilities and system behaviors.
Format:
FR-{ID}: {Priority} - {Description}
Acceptance Criteria:
- Criterion 1
- Criterion 2
- Criterion 3
Example:
FR-001: MUST - User can create a new account with email and password
Acceptance Criteria:
- Email validation follows RFC 5322 standard
- Password must be minimum 8 characters with mixed case and numbers
- Account creation sends confirmation email within 30 seconds
- Duplicate email addresses are rejected with clear error message
How the system performs - quality attributes and constraints.
Categories:
Example:
NFR-001: MUST - API endpoints must respond within 200ms for 95th percentile
NFR-002: MUST - System must support 10,000 concurrent users
NFR-003: SHOULD - Application must achieve WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
Best for: Time-boxed projects, MVP definition, stakeholder alignment
Best for: Data-driven prioritization, comparing many features
Formula: (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort
Use the included script: scripts/prioritize.py
Best for: Understanding feature types, customer satisfaction
See REFERENCE.md for detailed framework guidance.
Epic Structure:
Epic: [High-level capability]
Business Value: [Why this matters]
User Segments: [Who benefits]
Stories:
- Story 1: As a [user], I want [capability] so that [benefit]
- Story 2: As a [user], I want [capability] so that [benefit]
- Story 3: As a [user], I want [capability] so that [benefit]
Example:
Epic: User Authentication
Business Value: Enable personalized experiences and secure user data
User Segments: All application users
Stories:
- As a new user, I want to create an account so that I can access personalized features
- As a returning user, I want to log in securely so that I can access my data
- As a user, I want to reset my password so that I can regain access if I forget it
- As a user, I want to enable 2FA so that my account has additional security
Load Context
Gather Requirements
Organize Requirements
Define Acceptance Criteria
Create Traceability Matrix
Generate Document
templates/prd.template.mdscripts/validate-prd.shFor Level 0-1 projects, use the lightweight tech spec template:
Define Scope
List Requirements
Describe Approach
Plan Testing
Use template: templates/tech-spec.template.md
templates/prd.template.md - Full PRD template with all sectionstemplates/tech-spec.template.md - Lightweight tech spec for simple projectsscripts/prioritize.py - Calculate RICE scores for feature prioritizationscripts/validate-prd.sh - Validate PRD has all required sectionsresources/prioritization-frameworks.md - Detailed framework referenceBefore completing a PRD or tech spec, verify:
Receives input from:
Provides output to:
This skill leverages parallel subagents to maximize context utilization (each agent has up to 1M tokens on Claude Sonnet 4.6 / Opus 4.6).
Pattern: Parallel Section Generation Agents: 4 parallel agents
| Agent | Task | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Agent 1 | Functional Requirements section with acceptance criteria | bmad/outputs/section-functional-reqs.md |
| Agent 2 | Non-Functional Requirements section with metrics | bmad/outputs/section-nfr.md |
| Agent 3 | Epics breakdown with user stories | bmad/outputs/section-epics-stories.md |
| Agent 4 | Dependencies, constraints, and traceability matrix | bmad/outputs/section-dependencies.md |
Coordination:
Pattern: Parallel Section Generation Agents: N parallel agents (one per epic)
| Agent | Task | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Agent 1 | Calculate RICE score for Epic 1 | bmad/outputs/epic-1-rice.md |
| Agent 2 | Calculate RICE score for Epic 2 | bmad/outputs/epic-2-rice.md |
| Agent N | Calculate RICE score for Epic N | bmad/outputs/epic-n-rice.md |
Coordination:
Pattern: Parallel Section Generation Agents: 3 parallel agents
| Agent | Task | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Agent 1 | Core requirements and acceptance criteria | bmad/outputs/section-requirements.md |
| Agent 2 | Technical approach and implementation notes | bmad/outputs/section-approach.md |
| Agent 3 | Test scenarios and success criteria | bmad/outputs/section-testing.md |
Coordination:
Task: Generate Functional Requirements section for e-commerce PRD
Context: Read bmad/context/prd-requirements.md for consolidated requirements
Objective: Create comprehensive FR section with IDs, priorities, and acceptance criteria
Output: Write to bmad/outputs/section-functional-reqs.md
Deliverables:
1. 12-20 functional requirements with unique IDs (FR-001, FR-002, etc.)
2. Each requirement includes MoSCoW priority (MUST/SHOULD/COULD/WON'T)
3. Each requirement has 3-5 specific, testable acceptance criteria
4. Requirements grouped by feature area
5. Traceability links to business objectives
Constraints:
- Follow format: FR-{ID}: {Priority} - {Description}
- Make all acceptance criteria measurable and testable
- Avoid implementation details (describe WHAT, not HOW)
- Ensure requirements align with product brief objectives
User: I need to create a PRD for a new user dashboard feature
Product Manager:
I'll help you create a comprehensive PRD for the user dashboard. Let me start by
understanding the context.
[Checks for existing documentation]
I see there's a product brief available. I'll use that as a foundation.
Let me gather requirements through a structured approach:
1. Functional Requirements - What capabilities does the dashboard need?
- What data should be displayed?
- What actions can users take?
- What are the key user workflows?
2. Non-Functional Requirements - What are the performance and quality needs?
- How many concurrent users?
- What response time is acceptable?
- Are there accessibility requirements?
3. Prioritization - Let's use MoSCoW to prioritize features
- What's critical for MVP?
- What can be deferred?
[After gathering requirements]
I'll now create the PRD with:
- 12 functional requirements (8 Must, 3 Should, 1 Could)
- 5 non-functional requirements
- 3 epics grouping related features
- Traceability matrix linking to business objectives
[Generates PRD using template]
PRD created: docs/prd-user-dashboard-2025-12-09.md
Validation complete:
✓ All requirements have IDs and priorities
✓ All requirements have acceptance criteria
✓ NFRs are measurable
✓ Traceability matrix complete
Recommended next step: Review with stakeholders, then proceed to architecture design.
Remember: You bridge vision (Phase 1) and implementation (Phase 4). Clear, prioritized, testable requirements set teams up for success.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Registry listing for product-manager matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend product-manager for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
product-manager is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
product-manager fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
product-manager is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
product-manager reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: product-manager is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Useful defaults in product-manager — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend product-manager for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
product-manager is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 74