owasp-security

agamm/claude-code-owasp · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/agamm/claude-code-owasp --skill owasp-security
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Apply these security standards when writing or reviewing code.

skill.md

OWASP Security Best Practices Skill

Apply these security standards when writing or reviewing code.

Quick Reference: OWASP Top 10:2025

# Vulnerability Key Prevention
A01 Broken Access Control Deny by default, enforce server-side, verify ownership
A02 Security Misconfiguration Harden configs, disable defaults, minimize features
A03 Supply Chain Failures Lock versions, verify integrity, audit dependencies
A04 Cryptographic Failures TLS 1.2+, AES-256-GCM, Argon2/bcrypt for passwords
A05 Injection Parameterized queries, input validation, safe APIs
A06 Insecure Design Threat model, rate limit, design security controls
A07 Auth Failures MFA, check breached passwords, secure sessions
A08 Integrity Failures Sign packages, SRI for CDN, safe serialization
A09 Logging Failures Log security events, structured format, alerting
A10 Exception Handling Fail-closed, hide internals, log with context

Security Code Review Checklist

When reviewing code, check for these issues:

Input Handling

  • All user input validated server-side
  • Using parameterized queries (not string concatenation)
  • Input length limits enforced
  • Allowlist validation preferred over denylist

Authentication & Sessions

  • Passwords hashed with Argon2/bcrypt (not MD5/SHA1)
  • Session tokens have sufficient entropy (128+ bits)
  • Sessions invalidated on logout
  • MFA available for sensitive operations

Access Control

  • Check for framework-level auth middleware (e.g., Next.js middleware.ts, proxy.ts, Express middleware) before flagging missing per-route auth
  • Authorization checked on every request
  • Using object references user cannot manipulate
  • Deny by default policy
  • Privilege escalation paths reviewed

Data Protection

  • Sensitive data encrypted at rest
  • TLS for all data in transit
  • No sensitive data in URLs/logs
  • Secrets in environment/vault (not code)

Error Handling

  • No stack traces exposed to users
  • Fail-closed on errors (deny, not allow)
  • All exceptions logged with context
  • Consistent error responses (no enumeration)

Secure Code Patterns

SQL Injection Prevention

# UNSAFE
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# SAFE
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))

Command Injection Prevention

# UNSAFE
os.system(f"convert {filename} output.png")

# SAFE
subprocess.run(["convert", filename, "output.png"], shell=False)

Password Storage

# UNSAFE
hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()

# SAFE
from argon2 import PasswordHasher
PasswordHasher().hash(password)

Access Control

# UNSAFE - No authorization check
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
    return db.get_user(user_id)

# SAFE - Authorization enforced
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
@login_required
def get_user(user_id):
    if current_user.id != user_id and not current_user.is_admin:
        abort(403)
    return db.get_user(user_id)

Error Handling

# UNSAFE - Exposes internals
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
    return str(e), 500

# SAFE - Fail-closed, log context
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
    error_id = uuid.uuid4()
    logger.exception(f"Error {error_id}: {e}")
    return {"error": "An error occurred", "id": str(error_id)}, 500

Fail-Closed Pattern

# UNSAFE - Fail-open
def check_permission(user, resource):
    try:
        return auth_service.check(user, resource)
    except Exception:
        return True  # DANGEROUS!

# SAFE - Fail-closed
def check_permission(user, resource):
    try:
        return auth_service.check(user, resource)
    except Exception as e:
        logger.error(f"Auth check failed: {e}")
        return False  # Deny on error

Agentic AI Security (OWASP 2026)

When building or reviewing AI agent systems, check for:

Risk Description Mitigation
ASI01: Goal Hijack Prompt injection alters agent objectives Input sanitization, goal boundaries, behavioral monitoring
ASI02: Tool Misuse Tools used in unintended ways Least privilege, fine-grained permissions, validate I/O
ASI03: Identity & Privilege Abuse Delegated trust, inherited credentials, role chain exploits Short-lived scoped tokens, identity verification
ASI04: Supply Chain Compromised plugins/MCP servers Verify signatures, sandbox, allowlist plugins
ASI05: Code Execution Unsafe code generation/execution Sandbox execution, static analysis, human approval
ASI06: Memory Poisoning Corrupted RAG/context data Validate stored content, segment by trust level
ASI07: Insecure Inter-Agent Comms Spoofing/intercepting agent-to-agent messages Authenticate, encrypt, verify message integrity
ASI08: Cascading Failures Errors propagate across systems Circuit breakers, graceful degradation, isolation
ASI09: Human-Agent Trust Exploitation Over-trust in agents leveraged to manipulate users Label AI content, user education, verification steps
ASI10: Rogue Agents Compromised agents acting maliciously Behavior monitoring, kill switches, anomaly detection

Agent Security Checklist

  • All agent inputs sanitized and validated
  • Tools operate with minimum required permissions
  • Credentials are short-lived and scoped
  • Third-party plugins verified and sandboxed
  • Code execution happens in isolated environments
  • Agent communications authenticated and encrypted
  • Circuit breakers between agent components
  • Human approval for sensitive operations
  • Behavior monitoring for anomaly detection
  • Kill switch available for agent systems

ASVS 5.0 Key Requirements

Level 1 (All Applications)

  • Passwords minimum 12 characters
  • Check against breached password lists
  • Rate limiting on authentication
  • Session tokens 128+ bits entropy
  • HTTPS everywhere

Level 2 (Sensitive Data)

  • All L1 requirements plus:
  • MFA for sensitive operations
  • Cryptographic key management
  • Comprehensive security logging
  • Input validation on all parameters

Level 3 (Critical Systems)

  • All L1/L2 requirements plus:
  • Hardware security modules for keys
  • Threat modeling documentation
  • Advanced monitoring and alerting
  • Penetration testing validation

Language-Specific Security Quirks

Important: The examples below are illustrative starting points, not exhaustive. When reviewing code, think like a senior security researcher: consider the language's memory model, type system, standard library pitfalls, ecosystem-specific attack vectors, and historical CVE patterns. Each language has deeper quirks beyond what's listed here.

Different languages have unique security pitfalls. Here are the top 20 languages with key security considerations. Go deeper for the specific language you're working in:


JavaScript / TypeScript

Main Risks: Prototype pollution, XSS, eval injection

// UNSAFE: Prototype pollution
Object.assign(target, userInput)
// SAFE: Use null prototype or validate keys
Object.assign(Object.create(null), validated)

// UNSAFE: eval injection
eval(userCode)
// SAFE: Never use eval with user input

Watch for: eval(), innerHTML, document.write(), prototype chain manipulation, __proto__


Python

Main Risks: Pickle deserialization, format string injection, shell injection

# UNSAFE: Pickle RCE
pickle.loads(user_data)
# SAFE: Use JSON or validate source
json.loads(user_data)

# UNSAFE: Format string injection
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '%s'" % user_input
# SAFE: Parameterized
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = %s", (user_input,))

Watch for: pickle, eval(), exec(), os.system(), subprocess with shell=True


Java

Main Risks: Deserialization RCE, XXE, JNDI injection

how to use owasp-security

How to use owasp-security on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add owasp-security
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/agamm/claude-code-owasp --skill owasp-security

The skills CLI fetches owasp-security from GitHub repository agamm/claude-code-owasp and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/owasp-security

Reload or restart Cursor to activate owasp-security. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /owasp-security) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.842 reviews
  • Dev Bhatia· Dec 28, 2024

    We added owasp-security from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Zara Bhatia· Dec 24, 2024

    owasp-security fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Tariq Haddad· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in owasp-security — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Neel Flores· Nov 15, 2024

    We added owasp-security from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chen Verma· Nov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in owasp-security — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Neel Yang· Oct 6, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: owasp-security is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Neel Chen· Oct 2, 2024

    owasp-security has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Min Rao· Sep 21, 2024

    We added owasp-security from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Amina Mehta· Sep 13, 2024

    I recommend owasp-security for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Arya Haddad· Sep 9, 2024

    owasp-security reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 42

1 / 5