akka-net-best-practices

aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills · updated May 21, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill akka-net-best-practices
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Use this skill when:

skill.md

Akka.NET Best Practices

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Designing actor communication patterns
  • Deciding between EventStream and DistributedPubSub
  • Implementing error handling in actors
  • Understanding supervision strategies
  • Choosing between Props patterns and DependencyResolver
  • Designing work distribution across nodes
  • Creating testable actor systems that can run with or without cluster infrastructure
  • Abstracting over Cluster Sharding for local testing scenarios

Reference Files


1. EventStream vs DistributedPubSub

Critical: EventStream is LOCAL ONLY

Context.System.EventStream is local to a single ActorSystem process. It does NOT work across cluster nodes.

// BAD: This only works on a single server
// When you add a second server, subscribers on server 2 won't receive events from server 1
Context.System.EventStream.Subscribe(Self, typeof(PostCreated));
Context.System.EventStream.Publish(new PostCreated(postId, authorId));

When EventStream is appropriate:

  • Logging and diagnostics within a single process
  • Local event bus for truly single-process applications
  • Development/testing scenarios

Use DistributedPubSub for Multi-Node

For events that must reach actors across multiple cluster nodes, use Akka.Cluster.Tools.PublishSubscribe:

using Akka.Cluster.Tools.PublishSubscribe;

public class TimelineUpdatePublisher : ReceiveActor
{
    private readonly IActorRef _mediator;

    public TimelineUpdatePublisher()
    {
        // Get the DistributedPubSub mediator
        _mediator = DistributedPubSub.Get(Context.System).Mediator;

        Receive<PublishTimelineUpdate>(msg =>
        {
            // Publish to a topic - reaches all subscribers across all nodes
            _mediator.Tell(new Publish($"timeline:{msg.UserId}", msg.Update));
        });
    }
}

Akka.Hosting Configuration for DistributedPubSub

builder.WithDistributedPubSub(role: null); // Available on all roles, or specify a role

Topic Design Patterns

Pattern Topic Format Use Case
Per-user timeline:{userId} Timeline updates, notifications
Per-entity post:{postId} Post engagement updates
Broadcast system:announcements System-wide notifications
Role-based workers:rss-poller Work distribution

2. Supervision Strategies

Key Clarification: Supervision is for CHILDREN

A supervision strategy defined on an actor dictates how that actor supervises its children, NOT how the actor itself is supervised.

public class ParentActor : ReceiveActor
{
    // This strategy applies to children of ParentActor, NOT to ParentActor itself
    protected override SupervisorStrategy SupervisorStrategy()
    {
        return new OneForOneStrategy(
            maxNrOfRetries: 10,
            withinTimeRange: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30),
            decider: ex => ex switch
            {
                ArithmeticException => Directive.Resume,
                NullReferenceException => Directive.Restart,
                ArgumentException => Directive.Stop,
                _ => Directive.Escalate
            });
    }
}

Default Supervision Strategy

The default OneForOneStrategy already includes rate limiting:

  • 10 restarts within 1 second = actor is permanently stopped
  • This prevents infinite restart loops

You rarely need a custom strategy unless you have specific requirements.

When to Define Custom Supervision

Good reasons:

  • Actor throws exceptions indicating irrecoverable state corruption -> Restart
  • Actor throws exceptions that should NOT cause restart (expected failures) -> Resume
  • Child failures should affect siblings -> Use AllForOneStrategy
  • Need different retry limits than the default

Bad reasons:

  • "Just to be safe" - the default is already safe
  • Don't understand what the actor does - understand it first

3. Error Handling: Supervision vs Try-Catch

When to Use Try-Catch (Most Cases)

Use try-catch when:

  • The failure is expected (network timeout, invalid input, external service down)
  • You know exactly why the exception occurred
  • You can handle it gracefully (retry, return error response, log and continue)
  • Restarting would not help (same error would occur again)
public class RssFeedPollerActor : ReceiveActor
{
    public RssFeedPollerActor()
    {
        ReceiveAsync<PollFeed>(async msg =>
        {
            try
            {
                var feed = await _httpClient.GetStringAsync(msg.FeedUrl);
                var items = ParseFeed(feed);
                // Process items...
            }
            catch (HttpRequestException ex)
            {
                // Expected failure - log and schedule retry
                _log.Warning("Feed {Url} unavailable: {Error}", msg.FeedUrl, ex.Message);
                Context.System.Scheduler.ScheduleTellOnce(
                    TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5), Self, msg, Self);
            }
            catch (XmlException ex)
            {
                // Invalid feed format - log and mark as bad
                _log.Error("Feed {Url} has invalid format: {Error}", msg.FeedUrl, ex.Message);
                Sender.Tell(new FeedPollResult.InvalidFormat(msg.FeedUrl));
            }
        });
    }
}

When to Let Supervision Handle It

Let exceptions propagate (trigger supervision) when:

  • You have no idea why the exception occurred
  • The actor's state might be corrupt
  • A restart would help (fresh state, reconnect resources)
  • It's a programming error (NullReferenceException, InvalidOperationException from bad logic)

Anti-Pattern: Swallowing Unknown Exceptions

// BAD: Swallowing exceptions hides problems
catch (Exception ex)
{
    _log.Error(ex, "Error processing work");
    // Actor continues with potentially corrupt state
}

// GOOD: Handle known exceptions, let unknown ones propagate
catch (HttpRequestException ex)
{
    // Known, expected failure - handle gracefully
    _log.Warning("HTTP request failed: {Error}", ex.Message);
    Sender.Tell(new WorkResult.TransientFailure());
}
// Unknown exceptions propagate to supervision

4. Props vs DependencyResolver

When to Use Plain Props

Use Props.Create() when:

  • Actor doesn't need IServiceProvider or IRequiredActor<T>
  • All dependencies can be passed via constructor
  • Actor is simple and self-contained
// Simple actor with no DI needs
public static Props Props(PostId postId, IPostWriteStore store)
    => Akka.Actor.Props.Create(() => 
how to use akka-net-best-practices

How to use akka-net-best-practices on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add akka-net-best-practices
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill akka-net-best-practices

The skills CLI fetches akka-net-best-practices from GitHub repository aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/akka-net-best-practices

Reload or restart Cursor to activate akka-net-best-practices. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /akka-net-best-practices) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.566 reviews
  • Pratham Ware· Dec 28, 2024

    akka-net-best-practices reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Anaya Singh· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: akka-net-best-practices is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Emma Mensah· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend akka-net-best-practices for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Carlos Jain· Dec 16, 2024

    akka-net-best-practices fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Luis Anderson· Dec 4, 2024

    akka-net-best-practices has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Xiao Bhatia· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in akka-net-best-practices — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Ama Menon· Nov 19, 2024

    We added akka-net-best-practices from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Carlos Martin· Nov 11, 2024

    Registry listing for akka-net-best-practices matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Kiara Gill· Nov 7, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: akka-net-best-practices is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Carlos Gonzalez· Nov 7, 2024

    akka-net-best-practices is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 66

1 / 7