security-patterns

yonatangross/orchestkit · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill security-patterns
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Comprehensive security patterns for building hardened applications. Each category has individual rule files in rules/ loaded on-demand.

skill.md

Security Patterns

Comprehensive security patterns for building hardened applications. Each category has individual rule files in rules/ loaded on-demand.

Quick Reference

Category Rules Impact When to Use
Authentication 3 CRITICAL JWT tokens, OAuth 2.1/PKCE, RBAC/permissions
Defense-in-Depth 2 CRITICAL Multi-layer security, zero-trust architecture
Input Validation 3 HIGH Schema validation (Zod/Pydantic), output encoding, file uploads
OWASP Top 10 2 CRITICAL Injection prevention, broken authentication fixes
LLM Safety 3 HIGH Prompt injection defense, output guardrails, content filtering
PII Masking 2 HIGH PII detection/redaction with Presidio, Langfuse, LLM Guard
Scanning 3 HIGH Dependency audit, SAST (Semgrep/Bandit), secret detection
Advanced Guardrails 2 CRITICAL NeMo/Guardrails AI validators, red-teaming, OWASP LLM

Total: 20 rules across 8 categories

Quick Start

# Argon2id password hashing
from argon2 import PasswordHasher
ph = PasswordHasher()
password_hash = ph.hash(password)
ph.verify(password_hash, password)
# JWT access token (15-min expiry)
import jwt
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
payload = {
    'sub': user_id, 'type': 'access',
    'exp': datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(minutes=15),
}
token = jwt.encode(payload, SECRET_KEY, algorithm='HS256')
// Zod v4 schema validation
import { z } from 'zod';
const UserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(2).max(100),
  role: z.enum(['user', 'admin']).default('user'),
});
const result = UserSchema.safeParse(req.body);
# PII masking with Langfuse
import re
from langfuse import Langfuse

def mask_pii(data, **kwargs):
    if isinstance(data, str):
        data = re.sub(r'\b[\w.-]+@[\w.-]+\.\w+\b', '[REDACTED_EMAIL]', data)
        data = re.sub(r'\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b', '[REDACTED_SSN]', data)
    return data

langfuse = Langfuse(mask=mask_pii)

Authentication

Secure authentication with OAuth 2.1, Passkeys/WebAuthn, JWT tokens, and role-based access control.

Rule Description
auth-jwt.md JWT creation, verification, expiry, refresh token rotation
auth-oauth.md OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, DPoP, Passkeys/WebAuthn
auth-rbac.md Role-based access control, permission decorators, MFA

Key Decisions: Argon2id > bcrypt | Access tokens 15 min | PKCE required | Passkeys > TOTP > SMS

Defense-in-Depth

Multi-layer security architecture with no single point of failure.

Rule Description
defense-layers.md 8-layer security architecture (edge to observability)
defense-zero-trust.md Immutable request context, tenant isolation, audit logging

Key Decisions: Immutable dataclass context | Query-level tenant filtering | No IDs in LLM prompts

Input Validation

Validate and sanitize all untrusted input using Zod v4 and Pydantic.

Rule Description
validation-input.md Schema validation with Zod v4 and Pydantic, type coercion
validation-output.md HTML sanitization, output encoding, XSS prevention
validation-schemas.md Discriminated unions, file upload validation, URL allowlists

Key Decisions: Allowlist over blocklist | Server-side always | Validate magic bytes not extensions

OWASP Top 10

Protection against the most critical web application security risks.

Rule Description
owasp-injection.md SQL/command injection, parameterized queries, SSRF prevention
owasp-broken-auth.md JWT algorithm confusion, CSRF protection, timing attacks

Key Decisions: Parameterized queries only | Hardcode JWT algorithm | SameSite=Strict cookies

LLM Safety

Security patterns for LLM integrations including context separation and output validation.

Rule Description
llm-prompt-injection.md Context separation, prompt auditing, forbidden patterns
llm-guardrails.md Output validation pipeline: schema, grounding, safety, size
llm-content-filtering.md Pre-LLM filtering, post-LLM attribution, three-phase pattern

Key Decisions: IDs flow around LLM, never through | Attribution is deterministic | Audit every prompt

Context Separation (CRITICAL)

Sensitive IDs and data flow AROUND the LLM, never through it. The LLM sees only content — mapping back to entities happens deterministically after.

# CORRECT: IDs bypass the LLM
context = {"user_id": user_id, "tenant_id": tenant_id}  # kept server-side
llm_input = f"Summarize this document:\n{doc_text}"       # no IDs in prompt
llm_output = call_llm(llm_input)
result = {"summary": llm_output, **context}               # IDs reattached after

Output Validation Pipeline

Every LLM response MUST pass a 4-stage guardrail pipeline before reaching the user:

def validate_llm_output(raw_output: str, schema, sources: list[str]) -> str:
    # 1. Schema — does it match expected structure?
    parsed = schema.parse(raw_output)
    # 2. Grounding — are claims supported by source documents?
    assert_grounded(parsed, sources)
    # 3. Safety — toxicity, PII leakage, prompt leakage
    assert_safe(parsed, max_toxicity=0.5)
    # 4. Size — prevent token-bomb responses
    assert len(parsed.text) < MAX_OUTPUT_CHARS
    return parsed.text

PII Masking

PII detection and masking for LLM observability pipelines and logging.

Rule Description
pii-detection.md Microsoft Presidio, regex patterns, LLM Guard Anonymize
pii-redaction.md Langfuse mask callback, structlog/loguru processors, Vault deanonymization

Key Decisions: Presidio for enterprise | Replace with type tokens | Use mask callback at init

Scanning

Automated security scanning for dependencies, code, and secrets.

Rule Description
scanning-dependency.md npm audit, pip-audit, Trivy container scanning, CI gating
scanning-sast.md Semgrep and Bandit static analysis, custom rules, pre-commit
scanning-secrets.md Gitleaks, TruffleHog, detect-secrets with baseline management

Key Decisions: Pre-commit hooks for shift-left | Block on critical/high | Gitleaks + detect-secrets baseline

Advanced Guardrails

Production LLM safety with NeMo Guardrails, Guardrails AI validators, and DeepTeam red-teaming.

Rule Description
guardrails-nemo.md NeMo Guardrails, Colang 2.0 flows, Guardrails AI validators, layered validation
guardrails-llm-validation.md DeepTeam red-teaming (40+ vulnerabilities), OWASP LLM Top 10 compliance

Key Decisions: NeMo for flows, Guardrails AI for validators | Toxicity 0.5 threshold | Red-team pre-release + quarterly

Managed Hook Hierarchy (CC 2.1.49)

Plugin settings follow a 3-tier precedence:

Tier Source Overridable?
1. Managed (plugin settings.json) Plugin author ships defaults Yes, by user
2. Project (.claude/settings.json) Repository config Yes, by user
3. User (~/.claude/settings.json) Personal preferences Final authority

Security hooks shipped by OrchestKit are managed defaults — users can disable them but are warned. Enterprise admins can lock settings via managed profiles.

Anti-Patterns (FORBIDDEN)

# Authentication
user.password = request.form['password']       # Plaintext password storage
response_type=token                             # Implicit OAuth grant (deprecated)
return "Email not found"                        # Information disclosure

# Input Validation
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '" + name + "'"  # SQL injection
if (file.type === 'image/png') {...}               # Trusting Content-Type header

# LLM Safety
prompt = f"Analyze for user {user_id}"             # ID in prompt
artifact.user_id = llm_output["user_id"]           # Trusting LLM-generated IDs

# PII
logger.info(f"User email: {user.email}")           # Raw PII in logs
langfuse.trace(
how to use security-patterns

How to use security-patterns on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add security-patterns
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill security-patterns

The skills CLI fetches security-patterns from GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/security-patterns

Reload or restart Cursor to activate security-patterns. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /security-patterns) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.554 reviews
  • Kabir Park· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: security-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024

    We added security-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Ira Lopez· Dec 16, 2024

    security-patterns has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in security-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Ira Haddad· Nov 7, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: security-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • James Patel· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend security-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Emma Nasser· Nov 7, 2024

    Keeps context tight: security-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Pratham Ware· Oct 26, 2024

    Registry listing for security-patterns matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ira Yang· Oct 26, 2024

    security-patterns is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • James Desai· Oct 26, 2024

    Keeps context tight: security-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

showing 1-10 of 54

1 / 6