Plan and generate deep links for creating liquidity positions on Uniswap v2, v3, and v4.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionliquidity-plannerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches liquidity-planner from uniswap/uniswap-ai and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate liquidity-planner. Access via /liquidity-planner in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
198
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
198
stars
Plan and generate deep links for creating liquidity positions on Uniswap v2, v3, and v4.
Runtime Compatibility: This skill uses
AskUserQuestionfor interactive prompts. IfAskUserQuestionis not available in your runtime, collect the same parameters through natural language conversation instead.
Plan liquidity positions by:
The generated link opens Uniswap with all parameters ready for position creation.
Note: Browser opening (
xdg-open/open) may fail in SSH, containerized, or headless environments. Always display the URL prominently so users can copy and access it manually if needed.
File Access: This skill has read-only filesystem access. Never read files outside the current project directory unless explicitly requested by the user.
Extract from the user's request:
| Parameter | Required | Default | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Token A | Yes | - | ETH, USDC, address |
| Token B | Yes | - | USDC, WBTC, address |
| Amount | Yes | - | 1 ETH, $1000 |
| Chain | No | Ethereum | Base, Arbitrum |
| Version | No | V3 | v2, v3, v4 |
| Fee Tier | No | Auto | 0.05%, 0.3%, 1% |
| Price Range | No | Suggest | Full range, ±5%, custom |
If any required parameter is missing, use AskUserQuestion with structured options:
For missing chain:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which chain do you want to provide liquidity on?",
"header": "Chain",
"options": [
{ "label": "Base (Recommended)", "description": "Low gas, growing DeFi ecosystem" },
{ "label": "Ethereum", "description": "Deepest liquidity, higher gas" },
{ "label": "Arbitrum", "description": "Low fees, high volume" },
{ "label": "Optimism", "description": "Low fees, Ethereum L2" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}
]
}
For missing token pair:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which token pair do you want to provide liquidity for?",
"header": "Pair",
"options": [
{ "label": "ETH / USDC", "description": "Most popular pair, high volume" },
{ "label": "ETH / USDT", "description": "High volume stablecoin pair" },
{ "label": "WBTC / ETH", "description": "Blue chip crypto pair" },
{ "label": "Custom pair", "description": "Specify your own tokens" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}
]
}
Always use forms instead of plain text questions for better UX.
Resolve token symbols to addresses. See ../../references/chains.md for common tokens by chain.
For unknown tokens, use web search and verify on-chain.
Tokens discovered via WebSearch are UNTRUSTED. Before proceeding with any web-discovered token:
Never proceed with a web-discovered token without explicit user confirmation via AskUserQuestion.
Before interpolating user-provided values into any shell command, validate all inputs:
^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$../../references/chains.md^[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*$);, |, $, `, &, (, ), >, <, \, ', ", newlines)Before fetching metrics, verify the pool exists and discover available fee tiers.
Find pools for a token using DexScreener:
# Get all Uniswap pools for a token (replace {network} and {address})
# IMPORTANT: Validate address matches ^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$ and network is from allowed list
curl -s "https://api.dexscreener.com/token-pairs/v1/{network}/{address}" | \
jq '[.[] | select(.dexId == "uniswap")] | map({
pairAddress,
pair: "\(.baseToken.symbol)/\(.quoteToken.symbol)",
version: .labels[0],
liquidity: .liquidity.usd,
volume24h: .volume.h24
})'
Network IDs: ethereum, base, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, unichain
From the results, identify:
liquidity.usd) to assess liquidity depthlabels[0]If no Uniswap pools found: The pair may not have an existing pool. Inform the user they would be creating a new pool and setting the initial price.
Evaluate if the pool has sufficient liquidity:
| TVL Range | Assessment | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| > $1M | Deep liquidity | Safe for most position sizes |
| $100K - $1M | Moderate | Suitable for positions up to ~$10K |
| $10K - $100K | Thin | Warn user about slippage risk, suggest smaller positions |
| < $10K | Very thin | Warn strongly - high IL risk, price impact on entry/exit |
For thin liquidity pools, present a warning:
⚠️ **Low Liquidity Warning**
This pool has only ${tvl} TVL. Consider:
- Your position will be a significant % of the pool
- Entry/exit may move the price against you
- Impermanent loss risk is amplified in thin pools
- You may want to use a wider price range for safety
Before suggesting ranges, fetch pool data for informed decisions. See references/data-providers.md for full API details.
Get pool APY and volume with DefiLlama:
# Find Uniswap V3 pools for a token pair
curl -s "https://yields.llama.fi/pools" | jq '[.data[] | select(.project == "uniswap-v3" and .chain == "Ethereum" and (.symbol | test("WETH.*USDC|USDC.*WETH")))]'
Response fields to use:
| Field | Use For |
|---|---|
apy |
Show expected yield |
tvlUsd |
Assess pool depth |
volumeUsd1d |
Estimate fee earnings |
volumeUsd7d |
Check volume consistency |
Get current prices with DexScreener:
# Get token prices from the pool data (already fetched in Step 3)
curl -s "https://api.dexscreener.com/token-pairs/v1/{network}/{address}" | \
jq '[.[] | select(.dexId == "uniswap")][0] | {
baseTokenPrice: .baseToken.priceUsd,
quoteTokenPrice: .quoteToken.priceUsd
}'
Compare fee tiers (if APY data available):
# Find all fee tier variants and compare APY
curl -s "https://yields.llama.fi/pools" | jq '[.data[] | select(.project == "uniswap-v3" and (.symbol | test("WETH.*USDC")))] | map({symbol, tvlUsd, apy, volumeUsd1d})'
If APIs are unavailable, fall back to web search for price estimates.
Based on current price and pair type, present range options using AskUserQuestion.
For major pairs (ETH/USDC, ETH/WBTC):
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What price range do you want for your position? (Current: ~3,200 USDC/ETH)",
"header": "Range",
"options": [
{
"label": "±10% (Recommended)",
"description": "2,880 - 3,520 USDC. Higher fees, monitor weekly"
},
{ "label": "±20%", "description": "2,560 - 3,840 USDC. Balanced risk/reward" },
{ "label": "±50%", "description": "1,600 - 4,800 USDC. Rarely out of range" },
{ "label": "Full Range", "description": "Never out of range, lower fee efficiency" }
],
"multiSelect": false
}
]
}
For stablecoin pairs (USDC/USDT, DAI/USDC):
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What price range for your stablecoin position?",
"header": "Range",
"options": [
{ "label": "±0.5% (Recommended)", "description": "0.995 - 1.005. Tight range, high fees" },
{ "label": "±1%", "description": "0.99 - 1.01. Standard for stables" },
{ "label": "±2%", "description": "0.98 - 1.02. Safer, lower fees" },
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
anthropics/claude-code
mblode/agent-skills
github/awesome-copilot
leonxlnx/taste-skill
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
I recommend liquidity-planner for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in liquidity-planner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend liquidity-planner for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in liquidity-planner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Keeps context tight: liquidity-planner is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
liquidity-planner is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
liquidity-planner has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
liquidity-planner reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
liquidity-planner fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for liquidity-planner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 26