writing-specs-designs

refoundai/lenny-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill writing-specs-designs
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Framework-driven guidance for writing specs and design documents from seven product leaders.

  • Determine fidelity level upfront: low-fi sketches for alignment, high-fi specs for implementation details
  • Favor prototypes over static documentation; test the feel with real software rather than screenshots
  • Use fat marker sketches and breadboarding to avoid getting stuck on UI details like colors or spacing
  • Recognize that temporary design shortcuts often become permanent product decisions;
skill.md

Writing Specs & Designs

Help the user write effective specs and design documents using frameworks and insights from 7 product leaders.

How to Help

When the user asks for help with specs and design docs:

  1. Determine the fidelity level - Ask if they need conceptual alignment (low-fi) or detailed implementation guidance (high-fi)
  2. Encourage prototyping over polish - Push toward functional prototypes where possible rather than static documentation
  3. Focus on moving pieces - Help them identify the key affordances, connections, and system behaviors
  4. Consider long-term implications - Remind them that temporary shortcuts often become permanent design decisions

Core Principles

Low-fidelity sketches drive collaboration

Christina Wodtke: "If I got on the whiteboard and drew really badly, somebody else will go, 'No, no, no, it doesn't work that way. Give me this pen.' It gets you so fast to a shared vision." Drawing 'badly' invites participation and corrections, accelerating alignment.

Well-shaped specs clarify without over-specifying

Ryan Singer: "The output of the shaping session is some kind of drawing or diagram where engineers, product, and design are all saying, 'I know exactly what to go build.'" Aim for a level of detail where the team sees the 'electricity in the walls' without prescribing UI details.

Prototype to feel the product

Tamar Yehoshua: "I can't tell you if this is going to work. I have to feel it. I have to try it. A mock-up doesn't tell you what it's going to feel like." Push for prototypes with real data to test experience, not just static screenshots.

Code prototypes over static mocks

Noah Weiss: "We stopped spending cycles on design explorations of static mocks and said, 'How quickly can we get into prototyping the path in real software, even if it's messy and throwaway?'" Move to real software prototypes as quickly as possible.

Products live in the pixels

Nikita Bier: "You should be designing the hierarchy, the pixels, the flows, everything. Products live and die in the pixels." For zero-to-one products, own the granular design details; every tap is precious.

Optimize every tap

Nikita Bier: "Every tap on a mobile app is a miracle. Users will turn and bounce to their next app very quickly." Design with extreme efficiency; each interaction must provide immediate value.

Use fat marker sketches

Ryan Singer: "Use breadboarding and fat marker sketching. We're going to hit this button, go to here, this calculation runs, then we get this answer." Fat markers prevent getting bogged down in UI details like colors or spacing.

Shortcuts become permanent

Tom Conrad: "Temporary design shortcuts often become permanent product legacies that persist through multiple technical rewrites." Be mindful that early implementation details may define long-term user expectations.

PMs should learn to sketch

Ravi Mehta: "Learn how to sketch, learn Balsamiq. Having that ability to think at a conceptual level about how UI and UX works is a critical part of being a PM." Develop self-sufficiency in creating conceptual wireframes.

Questions to Help Users

  • "Do you need team alignment (low-fi sketch) or implementation guidance (high-fi spec)?"
  • "Could you prototype this instead of documenting it?"
  • "What are the 10 or fewer moving pieces in this solution?"
  • "Have you tested this design with real users, not just stakeholders?"
  • "What temporary shortcuts might become permanent decisions?"
  • "Is every tap in this flow providing clear value to the user?"

Common Mistakes to Flag

  • Over-specified wireframes - High-fidelity mockups can slow collaboration; start with fat marker sketches
  • Static mocks for complex interactions - Test the feel with real prototypes, not screenshots
  • Ignoring pixel-level details - For consumer products, every tap and transition matters
  • Specs that no one reads - If engineers aren't using the document, it's the wrong format or fidelity
  • Temporary decisions that persist - Recognize that early shortcuts may last decades

Deep Dive

For all 10 insights from 7 guests, see references/guest-insights.md

Related Skills

  • Writing PRDs
  • Usability Testing
  • Stakeholder Alignment
  • Shipping Products
how to use writing-specs-designs

How to use writing-specs-designs on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add writing-specs-designs
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/refoundai/lenny-skills --skill writing-specs-designs

The skills CLI fetches writing-specs-designs from GitHub repository refoundai/lenny-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/writing-specs-designs

Reload or restart Cursor to activate writing-specs-designs. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /writing-specs-designs) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.536 reviews
  • Mia Thomas· Dec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in writing-specs-designs — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 4, 2024

    writing-specs-designs is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: writing-specs-designs is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ama Zhang· Nov 7, 2024

    writing-specs-designs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Mia Mensah· Oct 26, 2024

    Keeps context tight: writing-specs-designs is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 14, 2024

    writing-specs-designs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Piyush G· Sep 25, 2024

    writing-specs-designs reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Mia Diallo· Sep 25, 2024

    Keeps context tight: writing-specs-designs is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Emma Chen· Sep 13, 2024

    Registry listing for writing-specs-designs matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Shikha Mishra· Aug 16, 2024

    I recommend writing-specs-designs for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 36

1 / 4