regression-testing▌
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe · updated Apr 8, 2026
<default_to_action>
- ›When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
Regression Testing
<default_to_action> When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
- ANALYZE what changed (git diff, impact analysis)
- SELECT tests based on change + risk (not everything)
- RUN in priority order (smoke → selective → full)
- OPTIMIZE execution (parallel, sharding)
- MONITOR suite health (flakiness, execution time)
Quick Regression Strategy:
- Per-commit: Smoke + changed code tests (5-10 min)
- Nightly: Extended regression (30-60 min)
- Pre-release: Full regression (2-4 hours)
Critical Success Factors:
- Smart selection catches 90% of regressions in 10% of time
- Flaky tests waste more time than they save
- Every production bug becomes a regression test </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- After any code change
- Before release
- After dependency updates
- After environment changes
Test Selection Strategies
| Strategy | How | Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Change-based | Git diff analysis | 70-90% |
| Risk-based | Priority by impact | 50-70% |
| Historical | Frequently failing | 40-60% |
| Time-budget | Fixed time window | Variable |
Change-Based Test Selection
// Analyze changed files and select impacted tests
function selectTests(changedFiles: string[]): string[] {
const testsToRun = new Set<string>();
for (const file of changedFiles) {
// Direct tests
testsToRun.add(`${file.replace('.ts', '.test.ts')}`);
// Dependent tests (via coverage mapping)
const dependentTests = testCoverage[file] || [];
dependentTests.forEach(t => testsToRun.add(t));
}
return Array.from(testsToRun);
}
// Example: payment.ts changed
// Runs: payment.test.ts, checkout.integration.test.ts, e2e/purchase.test.ts
CI/CD Integration
# .github/workflows/regression.yml
jobs:
quick-regression:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 15
steps:
- name: Analyze changes
id: changes
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v2
with:
filters: |
payment:
- 'src/payment/**'
auth:
- 'src/auth/**'
- name: Run affected tests
run: npm run test:affected
- name: Smoke tests (always)
run: npm run test:smoke
nightly-regression:
if: github.event_name == 'schedule'
timeout-minutes: 120
steps:
- run: npm test -- --coverage
Agent-Driven Regression
// Smart test selection
await Task("Regression Analysis", {
pr: 1234,
strategy: 'change-based-with-risk',
timeBudget: '15min'
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");
// Returns:
// {
// mustRun: ['payment.test.ts', 'checkout.integration.test.ts'],
// shouldRun: ['order.test.ts'],
// canSkip: ['profile.test.ts', 'search.test.ts'],
// estimatedTime: '12 min',
// riskCoverage: 0.94
// }
// Generate regression test from production bug
await Task("Bug Regression Test", {
bug: { id: 'BUG-567', description: 'Checkout fails > 100 items' },
preventRecurrence: true
}, "qe-test-generator");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/regression-testing/
├── test-selection/* - Impact analysis results
├── suite-health/* - Flakiness, timing trends
├── coverage-maps/* - Test-to-code mapping
└── bug-regressions/* - Tests from production bugs
Fleet Coordination
const regressionFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'comprehensive-regression',
agents: [
'qe-regression-risk-analyzer', // Analyze changes, select tests
'qe-test-executor', // Execute selected tests
'qe-coverage-analyzer', // Analyze coverage gaps
'qe-quality-gate' // Go/no-go decision
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
Related Skills
- risk-based-testing - Risk-based prioritization
- test-automation-strategy - Automation pyramid
- continuous-testing-shift-left - CI/CD integration
Remember
With Agents: qe-regression-risk-analyzer provides intelligent test selection achieving 90% defect detection in 10% of execution time. Agents generate regression tests from production bugs automatically.
Skill Composition
- Test failing? → Use
/test-failure-investigatorto diagnose root cause - File a bug → Use
/bug-reporting-excellencefor proper bug reporting - Test selection → Use
/risk-based-testingfor risk-based prioritization
Gotchas
- Agent defaults to "run everything" despite being told to select — explicitly constrain with
--affectedor file list - Change-based selection misses transitive dependencies — a model change can break a controller test 3 hops away
- Flaky tests in regression suites erode trust faster than missing tests — quarantine immediately, don't skip
- Agent may report "0 regressions" when tests simply weren't run — verify test count in output, not just pass/fail
- Running full regression in containers often OOMs — use
--workers=2and--shardfor CI environments
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★38 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for regression-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Isabella Abebe· Dec 28, 2024
regression-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Zara Sanchez· Dec 24, 2024
regression-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024
We added regression-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024
regression-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Isabella Yang· Nov 19, 2024
We added regression-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Tariq Khanna· Nov 19, 2024
Keeps context tight: regression-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Isabella Harris· Nov 15, 2024
regression-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 14, 2024
regression-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Martin· Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: regression-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 38