regression-testing▌
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
<default_to_action>
- ›When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
Regression Testing
<default_to_action> When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
- ANALYZE what changed (git diff, impact analysis)
- SELECT tests based on change + risk (not everything)
- RUN in priority order (smoke → selective → full)
- OPTIMIZE execution (parallel, sharding)
- MONITOR suite health (flakiness, execution time)
Quick Regression Strategy:
- Per-commit: Smoke + changed code tests (5-10 min)
- Nightly: Extended regression (30-60 min)
- Pre-release: Full regression (2-4 hours)
Critical Success Factors:
- Smart selection catches 90% of regressions in 10% of time
- Flaky tests waste more time than they save
- Every production bug becomes a regression test </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- After any code change
- Before release
- After dependency updates
- After environment changes
Test Selection Strategies
| Strategy | How | Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Change-based | Git diff analysis | 70-90% |
| Risk-based | Priority by impact | 50-70% |
| Historical | Frequently failing | 40-60% |
| Time-budget | Fixed time window | Variable |
Change-Based Test Selection
// Analyze changed files and select impacted tests
function selectTests(changedFiles: string[]): string[] {
const testsToRun = new Set<string>();
for (const file of changedFiles) {
// Direct tests
testsToRun.add(`${file.replace('.ts', '.test.ts')}`);
// Dependent tests (via coverage mapping)
const dependentTests = testCoverage[file] || [];
dependentTests.forEach(t => testsToRun.add(t));
}
return Array.from(testsToRun);
}
// Example: payment.ts changed
// Runs: payment.test.ts, checkout.integration.test.ts, e2e/purchase.test.ts
CI/CD Integration
# .github/workflows/regression.yml
jobs:
quick-regression:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 15
steps:
- name: Analyze changes
id: changes
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v2
with:
filters: |
payment:
- 'src/payment/**'
auth:
- 'src/auth/**'
- name: Run affected tests
run: npm run test:affected
- name: Smoke tests (always)
run: npm run test:smoke
nightly-regression:
if: github.event_name == 'schedule'
timeout-minutes: 120
steps:
- run: npm test -- --coverage
Agent-Driven Regression
// Smart test selection
await Task("Regression Analysis", {
pr: 1234,
strategy: 'change-based-with-risk',
timeBudget: '15min'
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");
// Returns:
// {
// mustRun: ['payment.test.ts', 'checkout.integration.test.ts'],
// shouldRun: ['order.test.ts'],
// canSkip: ['profile.test.ts', 'search.test.ts'],
// estimatedTime: '12 min',
// riskCoverage: 0.94
// }
// Generate regression test from production bug
await Task("Bug Regression Test", {
bug: { id: 'BUG-567', description: 'Checkout fails > 100 items' },
preventRecurrence: true
}, "qe-test-generator");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/regression-testing/
├── test-selection/* - Impact analysis results
├── suite-health/* - Flakiness, timing trends
├── coverage-maps/* - Test-to-code mapping
└── bug-regressions/* - Tests from production bugs
Fleet Coordination
const regressionFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'comprehensive-regression',
agents: [
'qe-regression-risk-analyzer', // Analyze changes, select tests
'qe-test-executor', // Execute selected tests
'qe-coverage-analyzer', // Analyze coverage gaps
'qe-quality-gate' // Go/no-go decision
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
Related Skills
- risk-based-testing - Risk-based prioritization
- test-automation-strategy - Automation pyramid
- continuous-testing-shift-left - CI/CD integration
Remember
With Agents: qe-regression-risk-analyzer provides intelligent test selection achieving 90% defect detection in 10% of execution time. Agents generate regression tests from production bugs automatically.
Skill Composition
- Test failing? → Use
/test-failure-investigatorto diagnose root cause - File a bug → Use
/bug-reporting-excellencefor proper bug reporting - Test selection → Use
/risk-based-testingfor risk-based prioritization
Gotchas
- Agent defaults to "run everything" despite being told to select — explicitly constrain with
--affectedor file list - Change-based selection misses transitive dependencies — a model change can break a controller test 3 hops away
- Flaky tests in regression suites erode trust faster than missing tests — quarantine immediately, don't skip
- Agent may report "0 regressions" when tests simply weren't run — verify test count in output, not just pass/fail
- Running full regression in containers often OOMs — use
--workers=2and--shardfor CI environments
How to use regression-testing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add regression-testing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches regression-testing from GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate regression-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /regression-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★38 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for regression-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Isabella Abebe· Dec 28, 2024
regression-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Zara Sanchez· Dec 24, 2024
regression-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024
We added regression-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024
regression-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Isabella Yang· Nov 19, 2024
We added regression-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Tariq Khanna· Nov 19, 2024
Keeps context tight: regression-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Isabella Harris· Nov 15, 2024
regression-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 14, 2024
regression-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Martin· Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: regression-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 38