testing-r-packages

posit-dev/skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/posit-dev/skills --skill testing-r-packages
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Modern best practices for R package testing using testthat 3+.

skill.md

Testing R Packages with testthat

Modern best practices for R package testing using testthat 3+.

Initial Setup

Initialize testing with testthat 3rd edition:

usethis::use_testthat(3)

This creates tests/testthat/ directory, adds testthat to DESCRIPTION Suggests with Config/testthat/edition: 3, and creates tests/testthat.R.

File Organization

Mirror package structure:

  • Code in R/foofy.R → tests in tests/testthat/test-foofy.R
  • Use usethis::use_r("foofy") and usethis::use_test("foofy") to create paired files

Special files:

  • helper-*.R - Helper functions and custom expectations, sourced before tests
  • setup-*.R - Run during R CMD check only, not during load_all()
  • fixtures/ - Static test data files accessed via test_path()

Test Structure

Tests follow a three-level hierarchy: File → Test → Expectation

Standard Syntax

test_that("descriptive behavior", {
  result <- my_function(input)
  expect_equal(result, expected_value)
})

Test descriptions should read naturally and describe behavior, not implementation.

BDD Syntax (describe/it)

For behavior-driven development, use describe() and it():

describe("matrix()", {
  it("can be multiplied by a scalar", {
    m1 <- matrix(1:4, 2, 2)
    m2 <- m1 * 2
    expect_equal(matrix(1:4 * 2, 2, 2), m2)
  })

  it("can be transposed", {
    m <- matrix(1:4, 2, 2)
    expect_equal(t(m), matrix(c(1, 3, 2, 4), 2, 2))
  })
})

Key features:

  • describe() groups related specifications for a component
  • it() defines individual specifications (like test_that())
  • Supports nesting for hierarchical organization
  • it() without code creates pending test placeholders

Use describe() to verify you implement the right things, use test_that() to ensure you do things right.

See references/bdd.md for comprehensive BDD patterns, nested specifications, and test-first workflows.

Running Tests

Three scales of testing:

Micro (interactive development):

devtools::load_all()
expect_equal(foofy(...), expected)

Mezzo (single file):

testthat::test_file("tests/testthat/test-foofy.R")
# RStudio: Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + T

Macro (full suite):

devtools::test()    # Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + T
devtools::check()   # Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + E

Core Expectations

Equality

expect_equal(10, 10 + 1e-7)      # Allows numeric tolerance
expect_identical(10L, 10L)       # Exact match required
expect_all_equal(x, expected)    # Every element matches (v3.3.0+)

Errors, Warnings, Messages

expect_error(1 / "a")
expect_error(bad_call(), class = "specific_error_class")
expect_no_error(valid_call())

expect_warning(deprecated_func())
expect_no_warning(safe_func())

expect_message(informative_func())
expect_no_message(quiet_func())

Pattern Matching

expect_match("Testing is fun!", "Testing")
expect_match(text, "pattern", ignore.case = TRUE)

Structure and Type

expect_length(vector, 10)
expect_type(obj, "list")
expect_s3_class(model, "lm")
expect_s4_class(obj, "MyS4Class")
expect_r6_class(obj, "MyR6Class")      # v3.3.0+
expect_shape(matrix, c(10, 5))         # v3.3.0+

Sets and Collections

expect_setequal(x, y)           # Same elements, any order
expect_contains(fruits, "apple") # Subset check (v3.2.0+)
expect_in("apple", fruits)       # Element in set (v3.2.0+)
expect_disjoint(set1, set2)      # No overlap (v3.3.0+)

Logical

expect_true(condition)
expect_false(condition)
expect_all_true(vector > 0)      # All elements TRUE (v3.3.0+)
expect_all_false(vector < 0)     # All elements FALSE (v3.3.0+)

Design Principles

1. Self-Sufficient Tests

Each test should contain all setup, execution, and teardown code:

# Good: self-contained
test_that("foofy() works", {
  data <- data.frame(x = 1:3, y = letters[1:3])
  result <- foofy(data)
  expect_equal(result$x, 1:3)
})

# Bad: relies on ambient state
dat <- data.frame(x = 1:3, y = letters[1:3])
test_that("foofy() works", {
  result <- foofy(dat)  # Where did 'dat' come from?
  expect_equal(result$x, 1:3)
})

2. Self-Contained Tests (Cleanup Side Effects)

Use withr to manage state changes:

test_that("function respects options", {
  withr::local_options(my_option = "test_value")
  withr::local_envvar(MY_VAR = "test")
  withr::local_package("jsonlite")

  result <- my_function()
  expect_equal(result$setting, "test_value")
  # Automatic cleanup after test
})

Common withr functions:

  • local_options() - Temporarily set options
  • local_envvar() - Temporarily set environment variables
  • local_tempfile() - Create temp file with automatic cleanup
  • local_tempdir() - Create temp directory with automatic cleanup
  • local_package() - Temporarily attach package

3. Plan for Test Failure

Write tests assuming they will fail and need debugging:

  • Tests should run independently in fresh R sessions
  • Avoid hidden dependencies on earlier tests
  • Make test logic explicit and obvious

4. Repetition is Acceptable

Repeat setup code in tests rather than factoring it out. Test clarity is more important than avoiding duplication.

5. Use devtools::load_all() Workflow

During development:

  • Use devtools::load_all() instead of library()
  • Makes all functions available (including unexported)
  • Automatically attaches testthat
  • Eliminates need for library() calls in tests

Snapshot Testing

For complex output that's difficult to verify programmatically, use snapshot tests. See references/snapshots.md for complete guide.

Basic pattern:

test_that("error message is helpful", {
  expect_snapshot(
    error = TRUE,
    validate_input(NULL)
  )
})

Snapshots stored in tests/testthat/_snaps/.

Workflow:

devtools::test()                    # Creates new snapshots
testthat::snapshot_review('name')   # Review changes
testthat::snapshot_accept('name')   # Accept changes

Test Fixtures and Data

Three approaches for test data:

1. Constructor functions - Create data on-demand:

new_sample_data <- function(n = 10) {
  data.frame(id = seq_len(n), value = rnorm(n))
}

2. Local functions with cleanup - Handle side effects:

local_temp_csv <- function(data, env = parent.frame()) {
  path <- withr::local_tempfile(fileext = ".csv", .local_envir = env)
  write.csv(data, path, row.names = FALSE)
  path
}

3. Static fixture files - Store in fixtures/ directory:

data <- readRDS(test_path("fixtures", "sample_data.rds"))

See references/fixtures.md for detailed fixture patterns.

Mocking

Replace external dependencies during testing using local_mocked_bindings(). See references/mocking.md for comprehensive mocking strategies.

Basic pattern:

test_that("function works with mocked dependency", {
  local_mocked_bindings(
    external_api = function(...) list(status = "success", data = "mocked")
  )

  result <- my_function_that_calls_api()
  expect_equal(result$status, "success")
})

Common Patterns

Testing Errors with Specific Classes

test_that("validation catches errors", {
  expect_error(
    validate_input("wrong_type"),
    class = "vctrs_error_cast"
  )
})

Testing with Temporary Files

test_that("file processing works", {
  temp_file <- withr::local_tempfile(
    lines = c("line1", "line2", "line3")
  )

  result <- process_file(temp_file)
  expect_equal(length(result), 3)
})

Testing with Modified Options

test_that("output respects width", {
  withr::local_options(width = 40)

  output <- capture_output(print(my_object))
  expect_lte(max(nchar(strsplit(output, "\n")[[1]])), 40)
})

Testing Multiple Related Cases

test_that("str_trunc() handles all directions", {
  trunc <- function(direction) {
    str_trunc("This string is moderately long", direction, width = 20)
  }

  expect_equal(trunc("right"), "This string is mo...")
  expect_equal(trunc("left"), "...erately long")
  expect_equal(trunc("center"), "This stri...ely long")
})

Custom Expectations in Helper Files

# In tests/testthat/helper-expectations.R
expect_valid_user <- function(user) {
  expect_type(user, "list")
  expect_named(user, c("id", "name", "email"))
  expect_type(user$id, "integer")
  expect_match(user$email, "@")
}

# In test file
test_that("user creation works", {
  user <- create_user("test@example.com")
  expect_valid_user(user)
})

File System Discipline

Always write to temp directory:

# Good
output <- withr::local_tempfile(fileext = ".csv")
write.csv(data, output)

# Bad - writes to package directory
write.csv(data, "output.csv")

Access test fixtures with test_path():

# Good - works in all contexts
data <- readRDS(test_path("fixtures", "data.rds"))

# Bad - relative paths break
data <- readRDS("fixtures/data.rds")

Advanced Topics

For advanced testing scenarios, see:

testthat 3 Modernizations

When working with testthat 3 code, prefer modern patterns:

Deprecated → Modern:

  • context() → Remove (duplicates filename)
  • expect_equivalent()expect_equal(ignore_attr = TRUE)
  • with_mock()local_mocked_bindings()
  • is_null(), is_true(), is_false()expect_null(), expect_true(), expect_false()

New in testthat 3:

  • Edition system (Config/testthat/edition: 3)
  • Improved snapshot testing
  • waldo::compare() for better diff output
  • Unified condition handling
  • local_mocked_bindings() works with byte-compiled code
  • Parallel test execution support

Quick Reference

Initialize: usethis::use_testthat(3)

Run tests: devtools::test() or Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + T

Create test file: usethis::use_test("name")

Review snapshots: testthat::snapshot_review()

Accept snapshots: testthat::snapshot_accept()

Find slow tests: devtools::test(reporter = "slow")

Shuffle tests: devtools::test(shuffle = TRUE)

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.668 reviews
  • Advait Ramirez· Dec 24, 2024

    testing-r-packages has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Diego Lopez· Dec 24, 2024

    We added testing-r-packages from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Neel Huang· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-r-packages is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Soo Martinez· Dec 16, 2024

    testing-r-packages has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Omar Bansal· Dec 12, 2024

    testing-r-packages reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024

    Keeps context tight: testing-r-packages is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024

    Registry listing for testing-r-packages matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Diego Jain· Nov 15, 2024

    testing-r-packages fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Advait Sanchez· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-r-packages is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Soo Torres· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in testing-r-packages — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 68

1 / 7