frontend-builder

daffy0208/ai-dev-standards · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill frontend-builder
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Build maintainable, performant React and Next.js frontends.

skill.md

Frontend Builder

Build maintainable, performant React and Next.js frontends.

Core Principles

1. Component Composition

Break UI into small, reusable, single-purpose components

2. State Proximity

Keep state as close to where it's used as possible

3. Performance by Default

Optimize rendering, code splitting, and asset loading

4. Developer Experience

Clear naming, consistent patterns, helpful errors

Framework Selection

React (Vite) vs. Next.js

Use React + Vite when:

  • Client-side only application
  • No SEO requirements
  • Simple deployment (static hosting)
  • Faster initial setup

Use Next.js when:

  • SEO important (marketing sites, blogs, e-commerce)
  • Server-side rendering needed
  • API routes required
  • File-based routing preferred
  • Image optimization critical

Recommended for most projects: Next.js (App Router)


Component Architecture

Component Types

1. Page Components (Route entry points):

// app/users/page.tsx (Next.js App Router)
export default function UsersPage() {
  return (
    <div>
      <Header />
      <UserList />
      <Footer />
    </div>
  )
}

2. Feature Components (Business logic):

// components/features/UserList.tsx
export function UserList() {
  const { data, isLoading } = useUsers()

  if (isLoading) return <LoadingSpinner />

  return (
    <div>
      {data.map(user => <UserCard key={user.id} user={user} />)}
    </div>
  )
}

3. UI Components (Reusable, no business logic):

// components/ui/button.tsx
export function Button({ children, variant = 'primary', ...props }) {
  return (
    <button
      className={cn(buttonVariants[variant])}
      {...props}
    >
      {children}
    </button>
  )
}

Component Best Practices

// ✅ Good: Small, focused, typed
interface UserProfileProps {
  user: User
  onEdit?: () => void
}

export function UserProfile({ user, onEdit }: UserProfileProps) {
  return (
    <div className="flex gap-4">
      <Avatar src={user.avatar} alt={user.name} />
      <UserDetails user={user} />
      {onEdit && <Button onClick={onEdit}>Edit</Button>}
    </div>
  )
}

// ❌ Bad: Giant, untyped, unclear
export function UserProfile(props) {
  // 500 lines of JSX, multiple responsibilities
  return <div>...</div>
}

State Management

Decision Tree

How many components need this state?
├─ One component → useState
├─ Parent + children → Props or useState + props
├─ Siblings → Lift to common parent
├─ Widely used (theme, auth) → Context API
└─ Complex app state → Zustand or Redux

Local State (useState)

// For component-level state
function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0)
  const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false)

  return (
    <div>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>{count}</button>
    </div>
  )
}

Context API

// For app-wide state (theme, auth, user)
const UserContext = createContext<UserContextType | undefined>(undefined)

export function UserProvider({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) {
  const [user, setUser] = useState<User | null>(null)

  return (
    <UserContext.Provider value={{ user, setUser }}>
      {children}
    </UserContext.Provider>
  )
}

export function useUser() {
  const context = useContext(UserContext)
  if (!context) throw new Error('useUser must be within UserProvider')
  return context
}

Zustand (Recommended for Complex State)

import { create } from 'zustand'

interface CounterStore {
  count: number
  increment: () => void
  decrement: () => void
  reset: () => void
}

export const useCounterStore = create<CounterStore>((set) => ({
  count: 0,
  increment: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count + 1 })),
  decrement: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count - 1 })),
  reset: () => set({ count: 0 })
})
how to use frontend-builder

How to use frontend-builder on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add frontend-builder
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill frontend-builder

The skills CLI fetches frontend-builder from GitHub repository daffy0208/ai-dev-standards and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/frontend-builder

Reload or restart Cursor to activate frontend-builder. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /frontend-builder) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.663 reviews
  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend frontend-builder for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yuki Reddy· Dec 20, 2024

    frontend-builder fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Tariq Chawla· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend frontend-builder for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Hiroshi Desai· Dec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: frontend-builder is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Sophia Jackson· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for frontend-builder matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Arya Khanna· Nov 27, 2024

    frontend-builder has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • William Tandon· Nov 23, 2024

    frontend-builder reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 11, 2024

    frontend-builder fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • William Menon· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend frontend-builder for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Arjun Bansal· Nov 7, 2024

    frontend-builder fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 63

1 / 7