product-designer▌
borghei/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Expert product design spanning UX research, UI systems, prototyping, and usability validation.
- ›Covers five-stage workflow: Discover (user research), Define (information architecture), Develop (wireframes and prototypes), Test (usability studies with 5–8 participants), and Deliver (design tokens and dev handoff)
- ›Includes 5-day design sprint format with daily checkpoints, user journey map templates, and card sorting methods for information architecture validation
- ›Provides design token
Product Designer
The agent operates as a senior product designer, delivering user-centered design solutions spanning UX research, UI design, design systems, prototyping, and usability testing.
Workflow
- Discover - Research user needs through interviews, analytics, and competitive analysis. Create user journey maps and identify pain points. Checkpoint: problem statement is validated by at least 3 user data points.
- Define - Synthesize findings into a clear problem statement and design requirements. Build information architecture (card sorting, site maps). Checkpoint: IA has been validated via card sort or tree test.
- Develop - Ideate solutions through sketching and wireframing. Build prototypes at appropriate fidelity. Checkpoint: prototype covers the complete happy path plus one error state.
- Test - Run usability tests with 5-8 participants. Measure task completion rate, time on task, error rate, and SUS score. Checkpoint: all critical usability issues are documented with severity ratings.
- Deliver - Refine designs based on test findings. Prepare dev handoff with design tokens, component specs, and interaction documentation. Checkpoint: engineering has confirmed feasibility of all interactions.
Design Sprint (5-Day Format)
| Day | Activity | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Monday | Map problem, interview experts | Challenge map, target area |
| Tuesday | Sketch solutions, Crazy 8s | Solution sketches |
| Wednesday | Decide, storyboard | Testable hypothesis |
| Thursday | Build prototype | Realistic clickable prototype |
| Friday | Test with 5 users | Validated/invalidated hypothesis |
User Journey Map Template
PERSONA: Sarah, Product Manager, goal: find analytics insights fast
STAGE: AWARENESS CONSIDER PURCHASE ONBOARD RETAIN
Actions: Searches Compares Signs up Configures Uses daily
Touchpoint: Google Website Checkout Setup wizard App
Emotion: Frustrated Curious Anxious Hopeful Satisfied
Pain point: Too many Hard to Complex Slow setup Missing
options compare pricing features
Opportunity: SEO content Comparison Simplify Quick-start Feature
tool flow template education
Information Architecture
Card Sorting Methods:
- Open sort: users create their own categories
- Closed sort: users place items into predefined categories
- Hybrid: combination approach
Example Site Map:
Home
+-- Products
| +-- Category A
| | +-- Product 1
| | +-- Product 2
| +-- Category B
+-- About
| +-- Team
| +-- Careers
+-- Resources
| +-- Blog
| +-- Help Center
+-- Account
+-- Profile
+-- Settings
UI Design Foundations
Design Principles
- Hierarchy - Visual weight guides attention via size, color, and contrast
- Consistency - Reuse patterns and components; maintain predictable interactions
- Feedback - Acknowledge every user action; show system status and loading states
- Accessibility - 4.5:1 color contrast minimum, focus indicators, screen reader support
Design Token System
/* Color tokens */
--color-primary-500: #3b82f6;
--color-primary-600: #2563eb;
--color-gray-50: #f9fafb;
--color-gray-900: #111827;
--color-success: #10b981;
--color-warning: #f59e0b;
--color-error: #ef4444;
/* Typography scale */
--text-sm: 0.875rem; /* 14px */
--text-base: 1rem; /* 16px */
--text-lg: 1.125rem; /* 18px */
--text-xl: 1.25rem; /* 20px */
--text-2xl: 1.5rem; /* 24px */
/* Spacing (4px base unit) */
--space-1: 0.25rem; /* 4px */
--space-2: 0.5rem; /* 8px */
--space-4: 1rem; /* 16px */
--space-6: 1.5rem; /* 24px */
--space-8: 2rem; /* 32px */
Component Structure
Button/
+-- Variants: Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Destructive
+-- Sizes: Small (32px), Medium (40px), Large (48px)
+-- States: Default, Hover, Active, Focus, Disabled, Loading
+-- Anatomy: [Leading Icon] Label [Trailing Icon]
Component Design Tokens (JSON)
{
"color": {
"primary": {"50": {"value": "#eff6ff"}, "500": {"value": "#3b82f6"}},
"semantic": {"success": {"value": "{color.green.500}"}, "error": {"value": "{color.red.500}"}}
},
"spacing": {"xs": {"value": "4px"}, "sm": {"value": "8px"}, "md": {"value": "16px"}},
"borderRadius": {"sm": {"value": "4px"}, "md": {"value": "8px"}, "full": {"value": "9999px"}}
}
Example: Usability Test Plan
# Usability Test: New Checkout Flow
## Objectives
- Validate that users can complete purchase in < 3 minutes
- Identify friction points in address and payment steps
## Participants
- 6 users (3 new, 3 returning)
- Mix of desktop and mobile
## Tasks
1. "Find a laptop under $1,000 and add it to your cart" (browse + add)
2. "Complete the purchase using a credit card" (checkout flow)
3. "Change the shipping address on your order" (post-purchase edit)
## Success Criteria
| Task | Completion Target | Time Target |
|------|-------------------|-------------|
| Browse + Add | 100% | < 60s |
| Checkout | 90%+ | < 180s |
| Edit address | 80%+ | < 90s |
## Metrics
- Task completion rate
- Time on task
- Error count per task
- System Usability Scale (SUS) score (target: 68+)
Prototype Fidelity Guide
| Fidelity | Purpose | Tools | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper | Quick exploration | Paper, pen | Minutes |
| Low-fi | Flow validation | Figma, Sketch | Hours |
| Mid-fi | Usability testing | Figma | Days |
| High-fi | Dev handoff, final testing | Figma | Days-Weeks |
Scripts
# Design token generator
python scripts/token_generator.py --source tokens.json --output css/
# Accessibility checker
python scripts/a11y_checker.py --url https://example.com
# Asset exporter
python scripts/asset_export.py --figma-file FILE_ID --format svg,png
# Design QA report
python scripts/design_qa.py --spec spec.figma --impl https://staging.example.com
Reference Materials
references/design_principles.md- Core design principlesreferences/component_library.md- Component guidelinesreferences/accessibility.md- Accessibility checklistreferences/research_methods.md- Research techniques
Tool Reference
design_critique.py
Evaluates a UI design against Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics and accessibility standards. Generates a structured critique report with severity ratings, compliance scores, and prioritized improvement recommendations.
| Flag | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
--checklist |
flag | - | Generate empty checklist for evaluation |
--answers |
string | - | Path to completed checklist JSON file |
--json |
flag | False | Output as JSON |
python scripts/design_critique.py --checklist
python scripts/design_critique.py --checklist --json > checklist.json
python scripts/design_critique.py --answers completed_checklist.json
python scripts/design_critique.py --answers completed_checklist.json --json
journey_mapper.py
Creates structured user journey maps with emotion curves, pain point identification, and opportunity analysis. Includes pre-built templates for SaaS, e-commerce, and mobile app journeys.
| Flag | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
--template, -t |
choice | - | Pre-built template: saas, ecommerce, mobile_app |
--stages, -s |
string | - | Path to custom stages JSON file |
--json |
flag | False | Output as JSON |
python scripts/journey_mapper.py --template saas
python scripts/journey_mapper.py --template ecommerce --json
python scripts/journey_mapper.py --stages custom_journey.json
usability_scorer.py
Calculates System Usability Scale (SUS) scores an
How to use product-designer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add product-designer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches product-designer from GitHub repository borghei/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate product-designer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /product-designer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★26 reviews- ★★★★★Anika Chen· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in product-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for product-designer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024
product-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: product-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Anika Desai· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend product-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 18, 2024
We added product-designer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anika Patel· Oct 6, 2024
product-designer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aarav Choi· Sep 13, 2024
We added product-designer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sofia Kapoor· Aug 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: product-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Aarav Robinson· Jul 23, 2024
product-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 26