Game Dev Planning

sprint-status

Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · updated Apr 16, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill sprint-status
summary

### Sprint Status

  • description: "Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any ti
  • argument-hint: "[sprint-number or blank for current]"
  • allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
skill.md

Sprint Status

This is a fast situational awareness check, not a sprint review. It reads the current sprint plan and story files, scans for status markers, and produces a concise snapshot in under 30 lines. For detailed sprint management, use /sprint-plan update or /milestone-review.

This skill is read-only. It never proposes changes, never asks to write files, and makes at most one concrete recommendation.


1. Find the Sprint

Argument: $ARGUMENTS[0] (blank = use current sprint)

  • If an argument is given (e.g., /sprint-status 3), search production/sprints/ for a file matching sprint-03.md, sprint-3.md, or similar. Report which file was found.
  • If no argument is given, find the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ and treat it as the current sprint.
  • If production/sprints/ does not exist or is empty, report: "No sprint files found. Start a sprint with /sprint-plan new." Then stop.

Read the sprint file in full. Extract:

  • Sprint number and goal
  • Start date and end date
  • All story or task entries with their priority (Must Have / Should Have / Nice to Have), owner, and estimate

2. Calculate Days Remaining

Using today's date and the sprint end date from the sprint file, calculate:

  • Total sprint days (end minus start)
  • Days elapsed
  • Days remaining
  • Percentage of time consumed

If the sprint file does not include explicit dates, note "Sprint dates not found — burndown assessment skipped."


3. Scan Story Status

First: check for production/sprint-status.yaml.

If it exists, read it directly — it is the authoritative source of truth. Extract status for each story from the status field. No markdown scanning needed. Use its sprint, goal, start, end fields instead of re-parsing the sprint plan.

If sprint-status.yaml does not exist (legacy sprint or first-time setup), fall back to markdown scanning:

  1. If the entry references a story file path, check if the file exists. Read the file and scan for status markers: DONE, COMPLETE, IN PROGRESS, BLOCKED, NOT STARTED (case-insensitive).
  2. If the entry has no file path (inline task in the sprint plan), scan the sprint plan itself for status markers next to that entry.
  3. If no status marker is found, classify as NOT STARTED.
  4. If a file is referenced but does not exist, classify as MISSING and note it.

When using the fallback, add a note at the bottom of the output: "⚠ No sprint-status.yaml found — status inferred from markdown. Run /sprint-plan update to generate one."

Optionally (fast check only — do not do a deep scan): grep src/ for a directory or file name that matches the story's system slug to check for implementation evidence. This is a hint only, not a definitive status.

Stale Story Detection

After collecting status for all stories, check each IN PROGRESS story for staleness:

  • For each story that has a referenced file, read the file and look for a Last Updated: field in the frontmatter or header (e.g., Last Updated: 2026-04-01 or updated: 2026-04-01). Accept any reasonable date field name: Last Updated, Updated, last-updated, updated_at.
  • Calculate days since that date using today's date.
  • If the date is more than 2 days ago, flag the story as STALE.
  • If no date field is found in the story file, note "no timestamp — cannot check staleness."
  • If the story has no referenced file (inline task), note "inline task — cannot check staleness."

STALE stories are included in the output table and collected into an "Attention Needed" section (see Phase 5 output format).

Stale story escalation: If any IN PROGRESS story is flagged STALE, the burndown verdict is upgraded to at least At Risk — even if the completion percentage is within the normal On Track window. Record this escalation reason: "At Risk — [N] story(ies) with no progress in [N] days."


4. Burndown Assessment

Calculate:

  • Tasks complete (DONE or COMPLETE)
  • Tasks in progress (IN PROGRESS)
  • Tasks blocked (BLOCKED)
  • Tasks not started (NOT STARTED or MISSING)
  • Completion percentage: (complete / total) * 100

Assess burndown by comparing completion percentage to time consumed percentage:

  • On Track: completion % is within 10 points of time consumed % or ahead
  • At Risk: completion % is 10-25 points behind time consumed %
  • Behind: completion % is more than 25 points behind time consumed %

If dates are unavailable, skip the burndown assessment and report "On Track / At Risk / Behind: unknown — sprint dates not found."


5. Output

Keep the total output to 30 lines or fewer. Use this format:

## Sprint [N] Status — [Today's Date]
**Sprint Goal**: [from sprint plan]
**Days Remaining**: [N] of [total] ([% time consumed])

### Progress: [complete/total] tasks ([%])

| Story / Task         | Priority   | Status      | Owner   | Blocker        |
|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| [title]              | Must Have  | DONE        | [owner] |                |
| [title]              | Must Have  | IN PROGRESS | [owner] |                |
| [title]              | Must Have  | BLOCKED     | [owner] | [brief reason] |
| [title]              | Should Have| NOT STARTED | [owner] |                |

### Attention Needed
| Story / Task         | Status      | Last Updated   | Days Stale | Note           |
|----------------------|-------------|----------------|------------|----------------|
| [title]              | IN PROGRESS | [date or N/A]  | [N days]   | [STALE / no timestamp — cannot check staleness / inline task — cannot check staleness] |

*(Omit this section entirely if no IN PROGRESS stories are stale or have timestamp concerns.)*

### Burndown: [On Track / At Risk / Behind]
[1-2 sentences. If behind: which Must Haves are at risk. If on track: confirm
and note any Should Haves the team could pull.]

### Must-Haves at Risk
[List any Must Have stories that are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED with less than
40% of sprint time remaining. If none, write "None."]

### Emerging Risks
[Any risks visible from the story scan: missing files, cascading blockers,
stories with no owner. If none, write "None identified."]

### Recommendation
[One concrete action, or "Sprint is on track — no action needed."]

6. Fast Escalation Rules

Apply these rules before outputting, and place the flag at the TOP of the output if triggered (above the status table):

Critical flag — if Must Have stories are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED and less than 40% of the sprint time remains:

SPRINT AT RISK: [N] Must Have stories are not complete with [X]% of sprint
time remaining. Recommend replanning with `/sprint-plan update`.

Completion flag — if all Must Have stories are DONE:

All Must Haves complete. Team can pull from Should Have backlog.

Missing stories flag — if any referenced story files do not exist:

NOTE: [N] story files referenced in the sprint plan are missing.
Run `/story-readiness sprint` to validate story file coverage.

Collaborative Protocol

This skill is read-only. It reports observed facts from files on disk.

  • It does not update the sprint plan
  • It does not change story status
  • It does not propose scope cuts (that is /sprint-plan update)
  • It makes at most one recommendation per run

For more detail on a specific story, the user can read the story file directly or run /story-readiness [path].

For sprint replanning, use /sprint-plan update. For end-of-sprint retrospective, use /milestone-review.

general reviews

Ratings

4.738 reviews
  • Arya Flores· Dec 24, 2024

    We added sprint-status from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024

    sprint-status reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Mia Martin· Dec 12, 2024

    Keeps context tight: sprint-status is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Mia Khan· Dec 8, 2024

    sprint-status has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Isabella Zhang· Nov 27, 2024

    sprint-status fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Liam Wang· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sprint-status is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Piyush G· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend sprint-status for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 26, 2024

    Useful defaults in sprint-status — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Arjun Srinivasan· Oct 18, 2024

    We added sprint-status from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Charlotte Smith· Oct 6, 2024

    sprint-status has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 38

1 / 4