Swift concurrency code reviewer that catches reentrancy bugs, isolation violations, and async/await pitfalls.
Works with
Scans for dangerous patterns across actors, structured/unstructured tasks, cancellation handling, and async streams using a 12-step review process
Targets Swift 6.2+ with strict concurrency checking, comparing build settings across multiple targets when needed
Prioritizes structured concurrency (task groups) over unstructured tasks and async/await over closure-based APIs and
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionswift-concurrency-proExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches swift-concurrency-pro from twostraws/swift-concurrency-agent-skill and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate swift-concurrency-pro. Access via /swift-concurrency-pro in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
308
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
308
stars
Review Swift concurrency code for correctness, modern API usage, and adherence to project conventions. Report only genuine problems - do not nitpick or invent issues.
Review process:
references/hotspots.md to prioritize what to inspect.references/new-features.md.references/actors.md.references/structured.md.references/unstructured.md.references/cancellation.md.references/async-streams.md.references/bridging.md.references/interop.md.references/bug-patterns.md.references/diagnostics.md.references/testing.md.If doing a partial review, load only the relevant reference files.
Task {}).async/await and closure-based variants, always prefer async/await.@unchecked Sendable to fix compiler errors. It silences the diagnostic without fixing the underlying race. Prefer actors, value types, or sending parameters instead. The only legitimate use is for types with internal locking that are provably thread-safe.Organize findings by file. For each issue:
Skip files with no issues. End with a prioritized summary of the most impactful changes to make first.
Example output:
Line 18: Actor reentrancy – state may have changed across the await.
// Before
actor Cache {
var items: [String: Data] = [:]
func fetch(_ key: String) async throws -> Data {
if items[key] == nil {
items[key] = try await download(key)
}
return items[key]!
}
}
// After
actor Cache {
var items: [String: Data] = [:]
func fetch(_ key: String) async throws -> Data {
if let existing = items[key] { return existing }
let data = try await download(key)
items[key] = data
return data
}
}
Line 34: Use withTaskGroup instead of creating tasks in a loop.
// Before
for url in urls {
Task { try await fetch(url) }
}
// After
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: Data.self) { group in
for url in urls {
group.addTask { try await fetch(url) }
}
for try await result in group {
process(result)
}
}
End of example.
references/hotspots.md - Grep targets for code review: known-dangerous patterns and what to check for each.references/new-features.md - Swift 6.2 changes that alter review advice: default actor isolation, isolated conformances, caller-actor async behavior, @concurrent, Task.immediate, task naming, and priority escalation.references/actors.md - Actor reentrancy, shared-state annotations, global actor inference, and isolation patterns.references/structured.md - Task groups over loops, discarding task groups, concurrency limits.references/unstructured.md - Task vs Task.detached, when Task {} is a code smell.references/cancellation.md - Cancellation propagation, cooperative checking, broken cancellation patterns.references/async-streams.md - AsyncStream factory, continuation lifecycle, back-pressure.references/bridging.md - Checked continuations, wrapping legacy APIs, @unchecked Sendable.references/interop.md - Migrating from GCD, Mutex/locks, completion handlers, delegates, and Combine.references/bug-patterns.md - Common concurrency failure modes and their fixes.references/diagnostics.md - Strict-concurrency compiler errors, protocol conformance fixes, and likely remedies.references/testing.md - Async test strategy with Swift Testing, race detection, avoiding timing-based tests.Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
I recommend swift-concurrency-pro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
swift-concurrency-pro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend swift-concurrency-pro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: swift-concurrency-pro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: swift-concurrency-pro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
swift-concurrency-pro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Registry listing for swift-concurrency-pro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
swift-concurrency-pro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: swift-concurrency-pro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added swift-concurrency-pro from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 64