swift-concurrency-pro

twostraws/swift-concurrency-agent-skill · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/twostraws/swift-concurrency-agent-skill --skill swift-concurrency-pro
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Swift concurrency code reviewer that catches reentrancy bugs, isolation violations, and async/await pitfalls.

  • Scans for dangerous patterns across actors, structured/unstructured tasks, cancellation handling, and async streams using a 12-step review process
  • Targets Swift 6.2+ with strict concurrency checking, comparing build settings across multiple targets when needed
  • Prioritizes structured concurrency (task groups) over unstructured tasks and async/await over closure-based APIs and
skill.md

Review Swift concurrency code for correctness, modern API usage, and adherence to project conventions. Report only genuine problems - do not nitpick or invent issues.

Review process:

  1. Scan for known-dangerous patterns using references/hotspots.md to prioritize what to inspect.
  2. Check for recent Swift 6.2 concurrency behavior using references/new-features.md.
  3. Validate actor usage for reentrancy and isolation correctness using references/actors.md.
  4. Ensure structured concurrency is preferred over unstructured where appropriate using references/structured.md.
  5. Check unstructured task usage for correctness using references/unstructured.md.
  6. Verify cancellation is handled correctly using references/cancellation.md.
  7. Validate async stream and continuation usage using references/async-streams.md.
  8. Check bridging code between sync and async worlds using references/bridging.md.
  9. Review any legacy concurrency migrations using references/interop.md.
  10. Cross-check against common failure modes using references/bug-patterns.md.
  11. If the project has strict-concurrency errors, map diagnostics to fixes using references/diagnostics.md.
  12. If reviewing tests, check async test patterns using references/testing.md.

If doing a partial review, load only the relevant reference files.

Core Instructions

  • Target Swift 6.2 or later with strict concurrency checking.
  • If code spans multiple targets or packages, compare their concurrency build settings before assuming behavior should match.
  • Prefer structured concurrency (task groups) over unstructured (Task {}).
  • Prefer Swift concurrency over Grand Central Dispatch for new code. GCD is still acceptable in low-level code, framework interop, or performance-critical synchronous work where queues and locks are the right tool – don't flag these as errors.
  • If an API offers both async/await and closure-based variants, always prefer async/await.
  • Do not introduce third-party concurrency frameworks without asking first.
  • Do not suggest @unchecked Sendable to fix compiler errors. It silences the diagnostic without fixing the underlying race. Prefer actors, value types, or sending parameters instead. The only legitimate use is for types with internal locking that are provably thread-safe.

Output Format

Organize findings by file. For each issue:

  1. State the file and relevant line(s).
  2. Name the rule being violated.
  3. Show a brief before/after code fix.

Skip files with no issues. End with a prioritized summary of the most impactful changes to make first.

Example output:

DataLoader.swift

Line 18: Actor reentrancy – state may have changed across the await.

// Before
actor Cache {
    var items: [String: Data] = [:]

    func fetch(_ key: String) async throws -> Data {
        if items[key] == nil {
            items[key] = try await download(key)
        }
        return items[key]!
    }
}

// After
actor Cache {
    var items: [String: Data] = [:]

    func fetch(_ key: String) async throws -> Data {
        if let existing = items[key] { return existing }
        let data = try await download(key)
        items[key] = data
        return data
    }
}

Line 34: Use withTaskGroup instead of creating tasks in a loop.

// Before
for url in urls {
    Task { try await fetch(url) }
}

// After
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: Data.self) { group in
    for url in urls {
        group.addTask { try await fetch(url) }
    }

    for try await result in group {
        process(result)
    }
}

Summary

  1. Correctness (high): Actor reentrancy bug on line 18 may cause duplicate downloads and a force-unwrap crash.
  2. Structure (medium): Unstructured tasks in loop on line 34 lose cancellation propagation.

End of example.

References

  • references/hotspots.md - Grep targets for code review: known-dangerous patterns and what to check for each.
  • references/new-features.md - Swift 6.2 changes that alter review advice: default actor isolation, isolated conformances, caller-actor async behavior, @concurrent, Task.immediate, task naming, and priority escalation.
  • references/actors.md - Actor reentrancy, shared-state annotations, global actor inference, and isolation patterns.
  • references/structured.md - Task groups over loops, discarding task groups, concurrency limits.
  • references/unstructured.md - Task vs Task.detached, when Task {} is a code smell.
  • references/cancellation.md - Cancellation propagation, cooperative checking, broken cancellation patterns.
  • references/async-streams.md - AsyncStream factory, continuation lifecycle, back-pressure.
  • references/bridging.md - Checked continuations, wrapping legacy APIs, @unchecked Sendable.
  • references/interop.md - Migrating from GCD, Mutex/locks, completion handlers, delegates, and Combine.
  • references/bug-patterns.md - Common concurrency failure modes and their fixes.
  • references/diagnostics.md - Strict-concurrency compiler errors, protocol conformance fixes, and likely remedies.
  • references/testing.md - Async test strategy with Swift Testing, race detection, avoiding timing-based tests.
how to use swift-concurrency-pro

How to use swift-concurrency-pro on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add swift-concurrency-pro
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/twostraws/swift-concurrency-agent-skill --skill swift-concurrency-pro

The skills CLI fetches swift-concurrency-pro from GitHub repository twostraws/swift-concurrency-agent-skill and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/swift-concurrency-pro

Reload or restart Cursor to activate swift-concurrency-pro. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /swift-concurrency-pro) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.764 reviews
  • Yuki Brown· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend swift-concurrency-pro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Zaid Chen· Dec 28, 2024

    swift-concurrency-pro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Tariq Sanchez· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend swift-concurrency-pro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Meera Farah· Dec 12, 2024

    Keeps context tight: swift-concurrency-pro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hassan Malhotra· Nov 19, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: swift-concurrency-pro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Daniel White· Nov 19, 2024

    swift-concurrency-pro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for swift-concurrency-pro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Yuki Jackson· Nov 11, 2024

    swift-concurrency-pro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Daniel Martin· Nov 7, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: swift-concurrency-pro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Layla Robinson· Nov 3, 2024

    We added swift-concurrency-pro from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 64

1 / 7