coverage-analysis

trailofbits/skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/trailofbits/skills --skill coverage-analysis
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Measure code exercised during fuzzing to assess harness effectiveness and identify blockers.

  • Supports LLVM, GCC, and Rust instrumentation with step-by-step workflows for building coverage-instrumented binaries and executing them against fuzzing corpora
  • Provides detailed guidance on generating text and HTML reports using llvm-cov, gcovr, and cargo-fuzz, including filtering harness code and handling large codebases
  • Includes practical patterns for identifying magic value checks, handlin
skill.md

Coverage Analysis

Coverage analysis is essential for understanding which parts of your code are exercised during fuzzing. It helps identify fuzzing blockers like magic value checks and tracks the effectiveness of harness improvements over time.

Overview

Code coverage during fuzzing serves two critical purposes:

  1. Assessing harness effectiveness: Understand which parts of your application are actually executed by your fuzzing harnesses
  2. Tracking fuzzing progress: Monitor how coverage changes when updating harnesses, fuzzers, or the system under test (SUT)

Coverage is a proxy for fuzzer capability and performance. While coverage is not ideal for measuring fuzzer performance in absolute terms, it reliably indicates whether your harness works effectively in a given setup.

Key Concepts

Concept Description
Coverage instrumentation Compiler flags that track which code paths are executed
Corpus coverage Coverage achieved by running all test cases in a fuzzing corpus
Magic value checks Hard-to-discover conditional checks that block fuzzer progress
Coverage-guided fuzzing Fuzzing strategy that prioritizes inputs that discover new code paths
Coverage report Visual or textual representation of executed vs. unexecuted code

When to Apply

Apply this technique when:

  • Starting a new fuzzing campaign to establish a baseline
  • Fuzzer appears to plateau without finding new paths
  • After harness modifications to verify improvements
  • When migrating between different fuzzers
  • Identifying areas requiring dictionary entries or seed inputs
  • Debugging why certain code paths aren't reached

Skip this technique when:

  • Fuzzing campaign is actively finding crashes
  • Coverage infrastructure isn't set up yet
  • Working with extremely large codebases where full coverage reports are impractical
  • Fuzzer's internal coverage metrics are sufficient for your needs

Quick Reference

Task Command/Pattern
LLVM coverage instrumentation (C/C++) -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping
GCC coverage instrumentation -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs
cargo-fuzz coverage (Rust) cargo +nightly fuzz coverage <target>
Generate LLVM profile data llvm-profdata merge -sparse file.profraw -o file.profdata
LLVM coverage report llvm-cov report ./binary -instr-profile=file.profdata
LLVM HTML report llvm-cov show ./binary -instr-profile=file.profdata -format=html -output-dir html/
gcovr HTML report gcovr --html-details -o coverage.html

Ideal Coverage Workflow

The following workflow represents best practices for integrating coverage analysis into your fuzzing campaigns:

[Fuzzing Campaign]
       |
       v
[Generate Corpus]
       |
       v
[Coverage Analysis]
       |
       +---> Coverage Increased? --> Continue fuzzing with larger corpus
       |
       +---> Coverage Decreased? --> Fix harness or investigate SUT changes
       |
       +---> Coverage Plateaued? --> Add dictionary entries or seed inputs

Key principle: Use the corpus generated after each fuzzing campaign to calculate coverage, rather than real-time fuzzer statistics. This approach provides reproducible, comparable measurements across different fuzzing tools.

Step-by-Step

Step 1: Build with Coverage Instrumentation

Choose your instrumentation method based on toolchain:

LLVM/Clang (C/C++):

clang++ -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping \
  -O2 -DNO_MAIN \
  main.cc harness.cc execute-rt.cc -o fuzz_exec

GCC (C/C++):

g++ -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs \
  -O2 -DNO_MAIN \
  main.cc harness.cc execute-rt.cc -o fuzz_exec_gcov

Rust:

rustup toolchain install nightly --component llvm-tools-preview
cargo +nightly fuzz coverage fuzz_target_1

Step 2: Create Execution Runtime (C/C++ only)

For C/C++ projects, create a runtime that executes your corpus:

// execute-rt.cc
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <stdint.h>

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size);

void load_file_and_test(const char *filename) {
    FILE *file = fopen(filename, "rb");
    if (file == NULL) {
        printf("Failed to open file: %s\n", filename);
        return;
    }

    fseek(file, 0, SEEK_END);
    long filesize = ftell(file);
    rewind(file);

    uint8_t *buffer = (uint8_t*) malloc(filesize);
    if (buffer == NULL) {
        printf("Failed to allocate memory for file: %s\n", filename);
        fclose(file);
        return;
    }

    long read_size = (long) fread(buffer, 1, filesize, file);
    if (read_size != filesize) {
        printf("Failed to read file: %s\n", filename);
        free(buffer);
        fclose(file);
        return;
    }

    LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(buffer, filesize);

    free(buffer);
    fclose(file);
}

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
    if (argc != 2) {
        printf("Usage: %s <directory>\n", argv[0]);
        return 1;
    }

    DIR *dir = opendir(argv[1]);
    if (dir == NULL) {
        printf("Failed to open directory: %s\n", argv[1]);
        return 1;
    }

    struct dirent *entry;
    while ((entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
        if (entry->d_type == DT_REG) {
            char filepath[1024];
            snprintf(filepath, sizeof(filepath), "%s/%s", argv[1], entry->d_name);
            load_file_and_test(filepath);
        }
    }

    closedir(dir);
    return 0;
}

Step 3: Execute on Corpus

LLVM (C/C++):

LLVM_PROFILE_FILE=fuzz.profraw ./fuzz_exec corpus/

GCC (C/C++):

./fuzz_exec_gcov corpus/

Rust: Coverage data is automatically generated when running cargo fuzz coverage.

Step 4: Process Coverage Data

LLVM:

# Merge raw profile data
llvm-profdata merge -sparse fuzz.profraw -o fuzz.profdata

# Generate text report
llvm-cov report ./fuzz_exec \
  -instr-profile=fuzz.profdata \
  -ignore-filename-regex='harness.cc|execute-rt.cc'

# Generate HTML report
llvm-cov show ./fuzz_exec \
  -instr-profile=fuzz.profdata \
  -ignore-filename-regex='harness.cc|execute-rt.cc' \
  -format=html -output-dir fuzz_html/

GCC with gcovr:

# Install gcovr (via pip for latest version)
python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip3 install gcovr

# Generate report
gcovr --gcov-executable "llvm-cov gcov" \
  --exclude harness.cc --exclude execute-rt.cc \
  --root . --html-details -o coverage.html

Rust:

# Install required tools
cargo 
how to use coverage-analysis

How to use coverage-analysis on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add coverage-analysis
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/trailofbits/skills --skill coverage-analysis

The skills CLI fetches coverage-analysis from GitHub repository trailofbits/skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/coverage-analysis

Reload or restart Cursor to activate coverage-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /coverage-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.861 reviews
  • Liam Ghosh· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in coverage-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Noor Chen· Dec 16, 2024

    We added coverage-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024

    Keeps context tight: coverage-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Neel Srinivasan· Dec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: coverage-analysis is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Zaid White· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend coverage-analysis for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Neel Singh· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend coverage-analysis for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Nikhil Dixit· Nov 27, 2024

    coverage-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Xiao Liu· Nov 15, 2024

    coverage-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Noor Jackson· Nov 7, 2024

    coverage-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 3, 2024

    coverage-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 61

1 / 7