Systematically isolate and fix code issues using structured debugging methodologies.
Works with
Covers six-step debugging workflow: information gathering, reproduction, isolation, root cause analysis, fix implementation, and verification
Includes common bug patterns (off-by-one, null references, race conditions, memory leaks, type mismatches) with targeted solutions
Provides debugging techniques: binary search isolation, print/log debugging, divide-and-conquer code elimination, and regression t
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondebuggingExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches debugging from supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate debugging. Access via /debugging in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
88
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
88
stars
Collect all relevant context about the issue:
Error details:
Environment:
# Check recent changes
git log --oneline -10
git diff HEAD~5
# Check dependency versions
npm list --depth=0 # Node.js
pip freeze # Python
Create a minimal, reproducible example:
# Bad: Vague description
"The function sometimes fails"
# Good: Specific reproduction steps
"""
1. Call process_data() with input: {"id": None}
2. Error occurs: TypeError at line 45
3. Expected: Return empty dict
4. Actual: Raises exception
"""
# Minimal reproduction
def test_reproduce_bug():
result = process_data({"id": None}) # Fails here
assert result == {}
Use binary search debugging to narrow down the issue:
Print/Log debugging:
def problematic_function(data):
print(f"[DEBUG] Input: {data}") # Entry point
result = step_one(data)
print(f"[DEBUG] After step_one: {result}")
result = step_two(result)
print(f"[DEBUG] After step_two: {result}") # Issue here?
return step_three(result)
Divide and conquer:
# Comment out half the code
# If error persists: bug is in remaining half
# If error gone: bug is in commented half
# Repeat until isolated
Common bug patterns and solutions:
| Pattern | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Off-by-one | Index out of bounds | Check loop bounds |
| Null reference | NullPointerException | Add null checks |
| Race condition | Intermittent failures | Add synchronization |
| Memory leak | Gradual slowdown | Check resource cleanup |
| Type mismatch | Unexpected behavior | Validate types |
Questions to ask:
Apply the fix with proper verification:
# Before: Bug
def get_user(user_id):
return users[user_id] # KeyError if not found
# After: Fix with proper handling
def get_user(user_id):
if user_id not in users:
return None # Or raise custom exception
return users[user_id]
Fix checklist:
Ensure the fix works and prevent regression:
# Add test for the specific bug
def test_bug_fix_issue_123():
"""Regression test for issue #123: KeyError on missing user"""
result = get_user("nonexistent_id")
assert result is None # Should not raise
# Add edge case tests
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
(None, None),
("", None),
("valid_id", {"name": "User"}),
])
def test_get_user_edge_cases(input, expected):
assert get_user(input) == expected
Error:
TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object
File "app.py", line 25, in process
name, email = get_user_info(user_id)
Analysis:
# Problem: get_user_info returns None when user not found
def get_user_info(user_id):
user = db.find_user(user_id)
if user:
return user.name, user.email
# Missing: return None case!
# Fix: Handle None case
def get_user_info(user_id):
user = db.find_user(user_id)
if user:
return user.name, user.email
return None, None # Or raise UserNotFoundError
Symptom: Test passes locally, fails in CI intermittently
Analysis:
# Problem: Shared state without synchronization
class Counter:
def __init__(self):
self.value = 0
def increment(self):
self.value += 1 # Not atomic!
# Fix: Add thread safety
import threading
class Counter:
def __init__(self):
self.value = 0
self._lock = threading.Lock()
def increment(self):
with self._lock:
self.value += 1
Tool: Use memory profiler
from memory_profiler import profile
@profile
def process_large_data():
results = []
for item in large_dataset:
results.append(transform(item)) # Memory grows
return results
# Fix: Use generator for large datasets
def process_large_data():
for item in large_dataset:
yield transform(item) # Memory efficient
| Language | Debugger | Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Python | pdb, ipdb | cProfile, memory_profiler |
| JavaScript | Chrome DevTools | Performance tab |
| Java | IntelliJ Debugger | JProfiler, VisualVM |
| Go | Delve | pprof |
| Rust | rust-gdb | cargo-flamegraph |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
supercent-io/skills-template
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
debugging has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in debugging — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
debugging is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
debugging reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend debugging for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
We added debugging from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: debugging is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added debugging from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 37