architecture-review

srstomp/pokayokay · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/srstomp/pokayokay --skill architecture-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Analyze, audit, and improve project structure.

skill.md

Architecture Review

Analyze, audit, and improve project structure.

Key Principles

  • Measure before changing — Map structure and identify concrete issues before proposing changes
  • Clear boundaries — Layers (UI, logic, data) separated with consistent dependency direction
  • Colocation — Related code together; easy to find, change, and delete features
  • Incremental migration — Refactor in phases, validate each step with tests

Quick Assessment

  • No circular dependencies
  • Consistent directory naming and grouping (by feature or by type)
  • Single responsibility per file/module, reasonable file sizes (<500 lines)
  • External dependencies isolated, shared code properly extracted
  • New developers can navigate and find code for any feature easily

Quick Start Checklist

  1. Map current structure: directory tree, dependency graph, module boundaries
  2. Identify issues: circular deps, god modules, leaky abstractions, deep nesting
  3. Classify severity: critical (blocks dev), high (maintenance burden), medium/low (friction)
  4. Propose target structure with migration plan
  5. Execute incrementally, validating with tests after each move

References

Reference Description
analysis-techniques.md Dependency graphs, complexity metrics, code analysis
refactoring-patterns.md Safe refactoring techniques, migration strategies
structural-patterns.md Directory structures for different project types
dependency-management.md Circular deps, coupling, module boundaries
cleanup-strategies.md Dead code removal, consolidation, naming conventions
anti-rationalization.md Iron Law, common rationalizations, red flag STOP list for architecture discipline

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.535 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: architecture-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Michael Jain· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend architecture-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Amina Agarwal· Dec 16, 2024

    We added architecture-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chen Bansal· Dec 16, 2024

    Keeps context tight: architecture-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kaira Agarwal· Dec 12, 2024

    architecture-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024

    architecture-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Isabella Sanchez· Nov 11, 2024

    architecture-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Isabella Patel· Nov 7, 2024

    architecture-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Nia Garcia· Oct 26, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 10, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 35

1 / 4