writing-plans

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill writing-plans
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Detailed implementation planning for multi-step engineering tasks with bite-sized, test-driven steps.

  • Generates comprehensive plans assuming zero codebase context, breaking work into 2–5 minute tasks following TDD principles (failing test, minimal implementation, passing test, commit)
  • Produces structured markdown documents with exact file paths, complete code snippets, and specific shell commands with expected outputs
  • Designed for handoff to either subagent-driven execution (fresh ag
skill.md

Writing Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).

Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):

  • "Write the failing test" - step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
  • "Commit" - step

Plan Document Header

Every plan MUST start with this header:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

**Step 1: Write the failing test**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

def function(input):
    return expected

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: PASS

Step 5: Commit

git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"

## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

## Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer execution choice:

**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**

**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints

**Which approach?"**

**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review

**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans

## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.870 reviews
  • Lucas Sharma· Dec 28, 2024

    Registry listing for writing-plans matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Anaya Menon· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: writing-plans is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Tariq Choi· Dec 12, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: writing-plans is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Naina Agarwal· Dec 12, 2024

    writing-plans is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: writing-plans is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Tariq Perez· Dec 8, 2024

    writing-plans is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Anaya Iyer· Dec 8, 2024

    writing-plans reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kofi Ndlovu· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend writing-plans for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Meera Harris· Nov 19, 2024

    Useful defaults in writing-plans — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Lucas Abebe· Nov 3, 2024

    We added writing-plans from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 70

1 / 7