golang-stretchr-testify

samber/cc-skills-golang · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-stretchr-testify
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.

skill.md

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.

Modes:

  • Write mode — adding new tests or mocks to a codebase.
  • Review mode — auditing existing test code for testify misuse.

stretchr/testify

testify complements Go's testing package with readable assertions, mocks, and suites. It does not replace testing — always use *testing.T as the entry point.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

assert vs require

Both offer identical assertions. The difference is failure behavior:

  • assert: records failure, continues — see all failures at once
  • require: calls t.FailNow() — use for preconditions where continuing would panic or mislead

Use assert.New(t) / require.New(t) for readability. Name them is and must:

func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
    is := assert.New(t)
    must := require.New(t)

    cfg, err := ParseConfig("testdata/valid.yaml")
    must.NoError(err)    // stop if parsing fails — cfg would be nil
    must.NotNil(cfg)

    is.Equal("production", cfg.Environment)
    is.Equal(8080, cfg.Port)
    is.True(cfg.TLS.Enabled)
}

Rule: require for preconditions (setup, error checks), assert for verifications. Never mix randomly.

Core Assertions

is := assert.New(t)

// Equality
is.Equal(expected, actual)              // DeepEqual + exact type
is.NotEqual(unexpected, actual)
is.EqualValues(expected, actual)        // converts to common type first
is.EqualExportedValues(expected, actual)

// Nil / Bool / Emptiness
is.Nil(obj)                  is.NotNil(obj)
is.True(cond)                is.False(cond)
is.Empty(collection)         is.NotEmpty(collection)
is.Len(collection, n)

// Contains (strings, slices, map keys)
is.Contains("hello world", "world")
is.Contains([]int{1, 2, 3}, 2)
is.Contains(map[string]int{"a": 1}, "a")

// Comparison
is.Greater(actual, threshold)     is.Less(actual, ceiling)
is.Positive(val)                  is.Negative(val)
is.Zero(val)

// Errors
is.Error(err)                     is.NoError(err)
is.ErrorIs(err, ErrNotFound)      // walks error chain
is.ErrorAs(err, &target)
is.ErrorContains(err, "not found")

// Type
is.IsType(&User{}, obj)
is.Implements((*io.Reader)(nil), obj)

Argument order: always (expected, actual) — swapping produces confusing diff output.

Advanced Assertions

is.ElementsMatch([]string{"b", "a", "c"}, result)             // unordered comparison
is.InDelta(3.14, computedPi, 0.01)                            // float tolerance
is.JSONEq(`{"name":"alice"}`, `{"name": "alice"}`)             // ignores whitespace/key order
is.WithinDuration(expected, actual, 5*time.Second)
is.Regexp(`^user-[a-f0-9]+$`, userID)

// Async polling
is.Eventually(func() bool {
    status, _ := client.GetJobStatus(jobID)
    return status == "completed"
}, 5*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond)

// Async polling with rich assertions
is.EventuallyWithT(func(c *assert.CollectT) {
    resp, err := client.GetOrder(orderID)
    assert.NoError(c, err)
    assert.Equal(c, "shipped", resp.Status)
}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond)

testify/mock

Mock interfaces to isolate the unit under test. Embed mock.Mock, implement methods with m.Called(), always verify with AssertExpectations(t).

Key matchers: mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("T"), mock.MatchedBy(func). Call modifiers: .Once(), .Times(n), .Maybe(), .Run(func).

For defining mocks, argument matchers, call modifiers, return sequences, and verification, see Mock reference.

testify/suite

Suites group related tests with shared setup/teardown.

Lifecycle

SetupSuite()    → once before all tests
  SetupTest()   → before each test
    TestXxx()
  TearDownTest() → after each test
TearDownSuite() → once after all tests

Example

type TokenServiceSuite struct {
    suite.Suite
    store   *MockTokenStore
    service *TokenService
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) SetupTest() {
    s.store = new(MockTokenStore)
    s.service = NewTokenService(s.store)
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) TestGenerate_ReturnsValidToken() {
    s.store.On("Save", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil)
    token, err := s.service.Generate("user-42")
    s.NoError(err)
    s.NotEmpty(token)
    s.store.AssertExpectations(s.T())
}

// Required launcher
func TestTokenServiceSuite(t *testing.T) {
    suite.Run(t, new(TokenServiceSuite))
}

Suite methods like s.Equal() behave like assert. For require: s.Require().NotNil(obj).

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting AssertExpectations(t) — mock expectations silently pass without verification
  • is.Equal(ErrNotFound, err) — fails on wrapped errors. Use is.ErrorIs to walk the chain
  • Swapped argument order — testify assumes (expected, actual). Swapping produces backwards diffs
  • assert for guards — test continues after failure and panics on nil dereference. Use require
  • Missing suite.Run() — without the launcher function, zero tests execute silently
  • Comparing pointersis.Equal(ptr1, ptr2) compares addresses. Dereference or use EqualExportedValues

Linters

Use testifylint to catch wrong argument order, assert/require misuse, and more. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linter skill.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general test patterns, table-driven tests, and CI
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linter skill for testifylint configuration

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.761 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for golang-stretchr-testify matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Omar Ndlovu· Dec 4, 2024

    We added golang-stretchr-testify from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Hana Singh· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-stretchr-testify is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Sophia Lopez· Nov 23, 2024

    golang-stretchr-testify has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-stretchr-testify is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 7, 2024

    golang-stretchr-testify reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 22, 2024

    We added golang-stretchr-testify from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Isabella Martinez· Oct 14, 2024

    golang-stretchr-testify fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024

    I recommend golang-stretchr-testify for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Maya Iyer· Sep 21, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-stretchr-testify is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

showing 1-10 of 61

1 / 7