asc-submission-health▌
rudrankriyam/app-store-connect-cli-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Preflight App Store submissions, validate builds, and monitor review status with asc command-line tools.
- ›Provides pre-submission checklist covering build validation, encryption compliance, content rights declarations, metadata completeness, and localization requirements
- ›Includes two submission workflows: the Review Submissions API (recommended) for granular control, and the simpler asc submit create command for direct version submission
- ›Offers monitoring and cancellation commands to
asc submission health
Use this skill to reduce review submission failures and monitor status.
Preconditions
- Auth configured and app/version/build IDs resolved.
- Build is processed (not in processing state).
- All required metadata is complete.
Pre-submission Checklist
1. Verify Build Status
asc builds info --build-id "BUILD_ID"
Check:
processingStateisVALIDusesNonExemptEncryption- iftrue, requires encryption declaration
2. Encryption Compliance
If usesNonExemptEncryption: true:
# If the app should be exempt, patch the local plist helper, rebuild, and re-upload
asc encryption declarations exempt-declare --plist "./Info.plist"
# List existing declarations
asc encryption declarations list --app "APP_ID"
# Create declaration if needed
asc encryption declarations create \
--app "APP_ID" \
--app-description "Uses standard HTTPS/TLS" \
--contains-proprietary-cryptography=false \
--contains-third-party-cryptography=true \
--available-on-french-store=true
# Assign to build
asc encryption declarations assign-builds \
--id "DECLARATION_ID" \
--build "BUILD_ID"
If the app truly uses only exempt transport encryption, prefer asc encryption declarations exempt-declare --plist "./Info.plist" and rebuild instead of creating a declaration that does not match the binary.
3. Content Rights Declaration
Required for all App Store submissions:
# Check current status
asc apps content-rights view --app "APP_ID"
# Set it for most apps
asc apps content-rights edit --app "APP_ID" --uses-third-party-content=false
Valid values:
DOES_NOT_USE_THIRD_PARTY_CONTENTUSES_THIRD_PARTY_CONTENT
4. Version Metadata
# Check version details
asc versions view --version-id "VERSION_ID" --include-build
# Verify copyright is set
asc versions update --version-id "VERSION_ID" --copyright "2026 Your Company"
5. Localizations Complete
# List version localizations
asc localizations list --version "VERSION_ID"
# Check required fields: description, keywords, whatsNew, supportUrl
6. Screenshots Present
Each locale needs screenshots for the target platform.
7. App Info Localizations (Privacy Policy)
# List app info IDs (if multiple exist)
asc apps info list --app "APP_ID"
# Check privacy policy URL
asc localizations list --app "APP_ID" --type app-info --app-info "APP_INFO_ID"
8. App Privacy readiness advisory
asc can warn about App Privacy readiness, but the public App Store Connect API
cannot verify whether App Privacy is fully published. Before final submission:
asc submit preflight --app "APP_ID" --version "1.2.3" --platform IOS
asc validate --app "APP_ID" --version "1.2.3" --platform IOS
Prefer the version string form for top-level readiness checks in this skill so it stays aligned with asc submit preflight. Lower-level commands later in this guide still use VERSION_ID where the API requires it.
If either command reports an App Privacy advisory, the public API cannot verify publish state. Use the web-session privacy workflow if you rely on those endpoints:
asc web privacy pull --app "APP_ID" --out "./privacy.json"
asc web privacy plan --app "APP_ID" --file "./privacy.json"
asc web privacy apply --app "APP_ID" --file "./privacy.json"
asc web privacy publish --app "APP_ID" --confirm
If you do not want to use the experimental asc web privacy ... commands,
confirm App Privacy manually in App Store Connect:
https://appstoreconnect.apple.com/apps/APP_ID/appPrivacy
9. Digital goods readiness (IAPs / subscriptions)
If the app sells subscriptions or in-app purchases, validate those separately before submit:
asc validate iap --app "APP_ID" --output table
asc validate subscriptions --app "APP_ID" --output table
In current asc, asc validate subscriptions expands MISSING_METADATA into a per-subscription diagnostics matrix. Use it to identify missing review screenshots, promotional images, pricing or availability coverage gaps, offer readiness, and app/build evidence before retrying submit or first-review attach.
Use --output json --pretty when you want exact territory gaps in machine-readable form.
Submit
Using Review Submissions API (Recommended)
# Create submission
asc review submissions-create --app "APP_ID" --platform IOS
# Add version to submission
asc review items-add \
--submission "SUBMISSION_ID" \
--item-type appStoreVersions \
--item-id "VERSION_ID"
# Submit for review
asc review submissions-submit --id "SUBMISSION_ID" --confirm
Using Submit Command
asc submit preflight --app "APP_ID" --version "1.2.3" --platform IOS
asc submit create --app "APP_ID" --version "1.2.3" --build "BUILD_ID" --confirm
Use --platform when multiple platforms exist.
Monitor
# Check submission status
asc submit status --id "SUBMISSION_ID"
asc submit status --version-id "VERSION_ID"
# List all submissions
asc review submissions-list --app "APP_ID" --paginate
Cancel / Retry
# Cancel submission
asc submit cancel --id "SUBMISSION_ID" --confirm
# Or via review API
asc review submissions-cancel --id "SUBMISSION_ID" --confirm
Fix issues, then re-submit.
Common Submission Errors
"Version is not in valid state"
Check:
- Build is attached and VALID
- Encryption declaration approved (or exempt)
- Content rights declaration set
- All localizations complete
- Screenshots present for all locales
- App Privacy has been reviewed and published in App Store Connect
"Export compliance must be approved"
The build has usesNonExemptEncryption: true. Either:
- Upload export compliance documentation
- Or rebuild with
ITSAppUsesNonExemptEncryption = NOin Info.plist
"Multiple app infos found"
Use --app-info flag with the correct app info ID:
asc apps info list --app "APP_ID"
Notes
asc submit createuses the new reviewSubmissions API automatically.asc submit preflightcan return non-blocking advisories; review them before submitting.- App Privacy publish state is not verifiable via the public API.
- Prefer
asc apps content-rights view/editover ad-hoc app JSON inspection. asc validate subscriptionsnow provides much richer per-subscription diagnostics forMISSING_METADATAcases.- If you use ASC web-session flows,
asc web privacy pull|plan|apply|publishis the CLI path for App Privacy. - If you avoid the experimental web-session commands, confirm App Privacy manually in App Store Connect.
- Use
--output tablewhen you want human-readable status. - macOS submissions follow the same process but use
--platform MAC_OS.
How to use asc-submission-health on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add asc-submission-health
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches asc-submission-health from GitHub repository rudrankriyam/app-store-connect-cli-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate asc-submission-health. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /asc-submission-health) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★35 reviews- ★★★★★Kwame Park· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for asc-submission-health matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Dev Rao· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: asc-submission-health is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 19, 2024
asc-submission-health is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Liam Okafor· Nov 11, 2024
asc-submission-health is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Olivia Menon· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in asc-submission-health — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Min Brown· Nov 3, 2024
We added asc-submission-health from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anaya Shah· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend asc-submission-health for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Min Shah· Oct 22, 2024
asc-submission-health fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 10, 2024
Keeps context tight: asc-submission-health is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Mia Gill· Oct 2, 2024
Keeps context tight: asc-submission-health is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 35