Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionretroExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches retro from phuryn/pm-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate retro. Access via /retro in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
9.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
9.6K
stars
Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.
You are facilitating a retrospective for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (sprint data, velocity charts, team feedback, or previous retro notes), read them first.
Choose a retro format based on context (or let the user pick):
Format A — Start / Stop / Continue:
Format B — 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For):
Format C — Sailboat:
If the user provides raw feedback (e.g., sticky notes, survey responses, Slack messages):
Analyze the sprint performance:
Generate prioritized action items:
| Priority | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Success Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Specific, actionable improvement] | [Name/Role] | [Date] | [How we'll know it worked] |
Create the retro summary:
## Sprint [X] Retrospective — [Date]
### Sprint Performance
- Goal: [Achieved / Partially / Missed]
- Committed: [X pts] | Completed: [Y pts]
### Key Themes
1. [Theme] — [summary]
### Action Items
1. [Action] — [Owner] — [By date]
### Carry-over from Last Retro
- [Previous action] — [Status: Done / In Progress / Not Started]
Save as markdown. Keep the tone constructive — the goal is improvement, not blame.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
pproenca/dot-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
mattpocock/skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: retro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: retro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for retro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
retro has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
retro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend retro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
retro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Useful defaults in retro — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
retro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
retro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 52