retro▌
phuryn/pm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.
Sprint Retrospective Facilitator
Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.
Context
You are facilitating a retrospective for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (sprint data, velocity charts, team feedback, or previous retro notes), read them first.
Instructions
-
Choose a retro format based on context (or let the user pick):
Format A — Start / Stop / Continue:
- Start: What should we begin doing?
- Stop: What should we stop doing?
- Continue: What's working well that we should keep?
Format B — 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For):
- Liked: What did the team enjoy?
- Learned: What new knowledge was gained?
- Lacked: What was missing?
- Longed For: What do we wish we had?
Format C — Sailboat:
- Wind (propels us): What's driving us forward?
- Anchor (holds us back): What's slowing us down?
- Rocks (risks): What dangers lie ahead?
- Island (goal): Where are we trying to get to?
-
If the user provides raw feedback (e.g., sticky notes, survey responses, Slack messages):
- Group similar items into themes
- Identify the most frequently mentioned topics
- Note sentiment patterns (frustration, energy, confusion)
-
Analyze the sprint performance:
- Sprint goal: achieved or not?
- Velocity vs. commitment (over-committed? under-committed?)
- Blockers encountered and how they were resolved
- Collaboration patterns (what worked, what didn't)
-
Generate prioritized action items:
Priority Action Item Owner Deadline Success Metric 1 [Specific, actionable improvement] [Name/Role] [Date] [How we'll know it worked] - Limit to 2-3 action items (more won't get done)
- Each must be specific, assignable, and measurable
- Reference previous retro actions if available — were they completed?
-
Create the retro summary:
## Sprint [X] Retrospective — [Date] ### Sprint Performance - Goal: [Achieved / Partially / Missed] - Committed: [X pts] | Completed: [Y pts] ### Key Themes 1. [Theme] — [summary] ### Action Items 1. [Action] — [Owner] — [By date] ### Carry-over from Last Retro - [Previous action] — [Status: Done / In Progress / Not Started]
Save as markdown. Keep the tone constructive — the goal is improvement, not blame.
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Diya Shah· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: retro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Li Diallo· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: retro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Michael Sanchez· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for retro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Daniel Farah· Nov 19, 2024
retro has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Meera Jain· Nov 19, 2024
retro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Maya Bhatia· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend retro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Li Shah· Nov 11, 2024
retro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Li Sharma· Oct 10, 2024
Useful defaults in retro — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Maya Gonzalez· Oct 10, 2024
retro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chen Huang· Oct 6, 2024
retro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 52