cohort-analysis▌
phuryn/pm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyze user engagement and retention patterns by cohort to identify trends in user behavior, feature adoption, and long-term engagement. Combine quantitative insights with qualitative research recommendations.
Cohort Analysis & Retention Explorer
Purpose
Analyze user engagement and retention patterns by cohort to identify trends in user behavior, feature adoption, and long-term engagement. Combine quantitative insights with qualitative research recommendations.
How It Works
Step 1: Read and Validate Your Data
- Accept CSV, Excel, or JSON data files with user cohort information
- Verify data structure: cohort identifier, time periods, engagement metrics
- Check for missing values and data quality issues
- Summarize key statistics (cohort sizes, date ranges, metrics available)
Step 2: Generate Quantitative Analysis
- Calculate cohort retention rates and engagement trends
- Identify retention curves, drop-off patterns, and anomalies
- Compute feature adoption rates across cohorts
- Calculate month-over-month or period-over-period changes
- Generate Python analysis scripts using pandas and numpy if requested
Step 3: Create Visualizations
- Generate retention heatmaps (cohorts vs. time periods)
- Create line charts showing cohort progression
- Build comparison charts for feature adoption
- Visualize drop-off points and engagement trends
- Output as interactive charts or static images
Step 4: Identify Insights & Patterns
- Spot one or more significant patterns:
- Early churn in specific cohorts
- Late-stage engagement changes
- Feature adoption clusters
- Seasonal or temporal trends
- Highlight surprising findings and deviations
- Compare cohort performance to establish baselines
Step 5: Suggest Follow-Up Research
- Recommend qualitative research methods:
- Targeted user interviews with churning users
- Feature usage surveys with engaged cohorts
- Session replays of key interaction patterns
- Win/loss analysis for high vs. low retention cohorts
- Design follow-up quantitative studies
- Suggest A/B tests or feature experiments
Usage Examples
Example 1: Upload CSV Data
Upload cohort_engagement.csv with columns: cohort_month, weeks_active,
user_id, feature_x_usage, engagement_score
Request: "Analyze retention patterns and identify why Q4 2025 cohorts
underperform compared to Q3"
Example 2: Describe Data Format
"I have monthly user cohorts from Jan-Dec 2025. Each row shows:
cohort date, user ID, purchase frequency, and support tickets.
Analyze which cohorts show best long-term retention."
Example 3: Feature Adoption Analysis
Upload feature_usage.xlsx with cohort adoption data.
Request: "Compare adoption curves for our new feature across cohorts.
Which cohorts adopted fastest? Any patterns?"
Key Capabilities
- Data Reading: Import CSV, Excel, JSON, SQL query results
- Retention Analysis: Calculate and visualize retention rates over time
- Cohort Comparison: Compare metrics across cohort groups
- Anomaly Detection: Flag unusual patterns or drop-offs
- Python Scripts: Generate reusable analysis code for ongoing analysis
- Visualizations: Create heatmaps, charts, and interactive dashboards
- Research Design: Suggest targeted follow-up studies and interview approaches
- Statistical Summary: Provide quantitative metrics and correlation analysis
Tips for Best Results
- Include time dimension: Provide data across multiple time periods
- Define cohort clearly: Make cohort grouping explicit (signup month, feature launch date, etc.)
- Provide context: Explain product changes, launches, or events during the period
- Multiple metrics: Include retention, engagement, feature usage, revenue, etc.
- Sufficient data: At least 3-4 cohorts for meaningful pattern identification
- Request specific output: Ask for visualizations, Python scripts, or research recommendations
Output Format
You'll receive:
- Data Summary: Cohort overview and data quality assessment
- Quantitative Findings: Key metrics, retention rates, and trend analysis
- Visualizations: Charts showing retention curves, adoption patterns
- Pattern Identification: 2-3 significant insights from the data
- Research Recommendations: Specific qualitative and quantitative follow-ups
- Analysis Scripts (if requested): Python code for reproducible analysis
- Next Steps: Prioritized actions based on findings
Further Reading
How to use cohort-analysis on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add cohort-analysis
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches cohort-analysis from GitHub repository phuryn/pm-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate cohort-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /cohort-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★53 reviews- ★★★★★Benjamin Ramirez· Dec 20, 2024
cohort-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Mei Thomas· Dec 20, 2024
cohort-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Valentina Wang· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in cohort-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kofi Wang· Nov 11, 2024
cohort-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Emma Bansal· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for cohort-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Emma Srinivasan· Oct 26, 2024
cohort-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Nia Brown· Oct 2, 2024
We added cohort-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Li Jain· Sep 25, 2024
cohort-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Luis Flores· Sep 21, 2024
cohort-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Zara Nasser· Sep 21, 2024
Useful defaults in cohort-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 53