git:analyze-issue

neolabhq/context-engineering-kit · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill git:analyze-issue
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Please analyze GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS and create a technical specification.

skill.md

Please analyze GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS and create a technical specification.

Follow these steps:

  1. Check if the issue is already loaded:

    • Look for the issue file in ./specs/issues/ folder
    • File naming pattern: <number-padded-to-3-digits>-<kebab-case-title>.md
    • If not found, fetch the issue details from GitHub (see step 2)
  2. Fetch the issue details (if not already loaded):

    • Read .claude/commands/load-issues.md to understand how to fetch issue details
    • Save the issue file following the load-issues.md format
  3. Understand the requirements thoroughly

  4. Review related code and project structure

  5. Create a technical specification with the format below

Technical Specification for Issue #$ARGUMENTS

Issue Summary

  • Title: [Issue title from GitHub]
  • Description: [Brief description from issue]
  • Labels: [Labels from issue]
  • Priority: [High/Medium/Low based on issue content]

Problem Statement

[1-2 paragraphs explaining the problem]

Technical Approach

[Detailed technical approach]

Implementation Plan

  1. [Step 1]
  2. [Step 2]
  3. [Step 3]

Test Plan

  1. Unit Tests:
    • [test scenario]
  2. Component Tests:
    • [test scenario]
  3. Integration Tests:
    • [test scenario]

Files to Modify

Files to Create

Existing Utilities to Leverage

Success Criteria

  • [criterion 1]
  • [criterion 2]

Out of Scope

  • [item 1]
  • [item 2]

Remember to follow our strict TDD principles, KISS approach, and 300-line file limit.

IMPORTANT: After completing your analysis, SAVE the full technical specification to: ./specs/issues/<number-padded-to-3-digits>-<kebab-case-title>.specs.md

For example, for issue #7 with title "Make code review trigger on any *.SQL and .sh file changes", save to: ./specs/issues/007-make-code-review-trigger-on-sql-sh-changes.specs.md

After saving, provide a brief summary to the user confirming:

  • Issue number and title analyzed
  • File path where the specification was saved
  • Key highlights from the specification (2-3 bullet points)

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.746 reviews
  • Jin Tandon· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Xiao Huang· Dec 20, 2024

    git:analyze-issue reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for git:analyze-issue matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Arjun Ghosh· Dec 4, 2024

    git:analyze-issue is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Michael Chen· Dec 4, 2024

    git:analyze-issue fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Min Mensah· Nov 23, 2024

    We added git:analyze-issue from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024

    git:analyze-issue reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Evelyn Li· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for git:analyze-issue matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Naina Zhang· Nov 11, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 46

1 / 5