Please analyze GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS and create a technical specification.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiongit:analyze-issueExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches git:analyze-issue from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate git:analyze-issue. Access via /git:analyze-issue in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
765
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
765
stars
Please analyze GitHub issue #$ARGUMENTS and create a technical specification.
Follow these steps:
Check if the issue is already loaded:
./specs/issues/ folder<number-padded-to-3-digits>-<kebab-case-title>.mdFetch the issue details (if not already loaded):
.claude/commands/load-issues.md to understand how to fetch issue detailsUnderstand the requirements thoroughly
Review related code and project structure
Create a technical specification with the format below
[1-2 paragraphs explaining the problem]
[Detailed technical approach]
Remember to follow our strict TDD principles, KISS approach, and 300-line file limit.
IMPORTANT: After completing your analysis, SAVE the full technical specification to:
./specs/issues/<number-padded-to-3-digits>-<kebab-case-title>.specs.md
For example, for issue #7 with title "Make code review trigger on any *.SQL and .sh file changes", save to:
./specs/issues/007-make-code-review-trigger-on-sql-sh-changes.specs.md
After saving, provide a brief summary to the user confirming:
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
jezweb/claude-skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
git:analyze-issue reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for git:analyze-issue matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
git:analyze-issue is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
git:analyze-issue fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added git:analyze-issue from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
git:analyze-issue reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for git:analyze-issue matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:analyze-issue is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 46