debugging▌
mrgoonie/claudekit-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
A collection of systematic debugging methodologies that ensure thorough investigation before attempting fixes.
Debugging Skills
A collection of systematic debugging methodologies that ensure thorough investigation before attempting fixes.
Available Sub-Skills
Systematic Debugging
Location: systematic-debugging/SKILL.md
Four-phase debugging framework: Root Cause Investigation → Pattern Analysis → Hypothesis Testing → Implementation. The iron law: NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST.
Root Cause Tracing
Location: root-cause-tracing/SKILL.md
Trace bugs backward through the call stack to find the original trigger. Don't fix symptoms - find where invalid data originated and fix at the source.
Defense-in-Depth Validation
Location: defense-in-depth/SKILL.md
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible. Four layers: Entry Point → Business Logic → Environment Guards → Debug Instrumentation.
Verification Before Completion
Location: verification-before-completion/SKILL.md
Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success. The iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.
When to Use
- Bug in production → Start with systematic-debugging
- Error deep in stack trace → Use root-cause-tracing
- Fixing a bug → Apply defense-in-depth after finding root cause
- About to claim "done" → Use verification-before-completion
Quick Dispatch
| Symptom | Sub-Skill |
|---|---|
| Test failure, unexpected behavior | systematic-debugging |
| Error appears in wrong location | root-cause-tracing |
| Same bug keeps recurring | defense-in-depth |
| Need to confirm fix works | verification-before-completion |
Core Philosophy
"Systematic debugging is FASTER than guess-and-check thrashing."
From real debugging sessions:
- Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to fix
- Random fixes approach: 2-3 hours of thrashing
- First-time fix rate: 95% vs 40%
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★73 reviews- ★★★★★Chen Ramirez· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: debugging is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Amina Chawla· Dec 16, 2024
debugging has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ira Ghosh· Dec 12, 2024
debugging fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★James Garcia· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Amina Agarwal· Dec 4, 2024
debugging reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Diya Yang· Nov 27, 2024
debugging has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Sanchez· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for debugging matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Johnson· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: debugging is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Arya Kim· Nov 7, 2024
I recommend debugging for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yuki Patel· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 73