tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification

mims-harvard/tooluniverse · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Transform patient genomic and clinical profiles into actionable risk stratification, treatment recommendations, and personalized therapeutic strategies.

skill.md

Precision Medicine Patient Stratification

Transform patient genomic and clinical profiles into actionable risk stratification, treatment recommendations, and personalized therapeutic strategies.

Reasoning Before Searching

Stratification means splitting patients into groups that respond differently to a treatment or have different prognoses. Ask these questions before running any tools:

  1. What molecular feature predicts response? Candidates: somatic mutation (e.g., EGFR L858R), germline variant (e.g., BRCA1 LoF), expression level (e.g., HER2 overexpression), germline pharmacogenomic variant (e.g., CYP2C19 PM), or composite biomarker (e.g., TMB-H + MSI-H).
  2. Is the predictive feature actionable? Knowing it must change treatment — either the drug choice, dose, or monitoring plan. A variant with prognostic value but no therapeutic consequence is not a stratification biomarker.
  3. What is the evidence level for the stratifier? FDA-approved companion diagnostic (T1) vs. exploratory (T4) changes how much weight to place on the finding.

Route to the correct Phase 3 path BEFORE running Phase 2 tools — cancer, metabolic, CVD, rare disease, and autoimmune pipelines require different stratifiers.

LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume a variant is pathogenic, never assume a gene is relevant to a disease, never assign metabolizer status without PharmGKB or CPIC evidence.

KEY PRINCIPLES:

  1. Report-first - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
  2. Disease-specific logic - Cancer vs metabolic vs rare disease pipelines diverge at Phase 3
  3. Multi-level integration - Germline + somatic + expression + clinical data layers
  4. Evidence-graded - Every finding has an evidence tier (T1-T4)
  5. Quantitative output - Precision Medicine Risk Score (0-100)
  6. Source-referenced - Every statement cites the tool/database source
  7. English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls

Reference files (same directory):

  • TOOLS_REFERENCE.md - Tool parameters, response formats, phase-by-phase tool lists
  • SCORING_REFERENCE.md - Scoring matrices, risk tiers, pathogenicity tables, PGx tables
  • REPORT_TEMPLATE.md - Output report template, treatment algorithms, completeness requirements
  • EXAMPLES.md - Six worked examples (cancer, metabolic, NSCLC, CVD, rare, neuro)
  • QUICK_START.md - Sample prompts and output summary

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

When to Use

Apply when user asks about patient risk stratification, treatment selection, prognosis prediction, or personalized therapeutic strategy for any disease with genomic/clinical data.

NOT for (use other skills instead):

  • Single variant interpretation -> tooluniverse-variant-interpretation
  • Immunotherapy-specific prediction -> tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction
  • Drug safety profiling only -> tooluniverse-adverse-event-detection
  • Target validation -> tooluniverse-drug-target-validation
  • Clinical trial search only -> tooluniverse-clinical-trial-matching
  • Drug-drug interaction only -> tooluniverse-drug-drug-interaction
  • PRS calculation only -> tooluniverse-polygenic-risk-score

Input Parsing

Required

  • Disease/condition: Free-text disease name
  • At least one of: Germline variants, somatic mutations, gene list, or clinical biomarkers

Optional (improves stratification)

  • Age, sex, ethnicity, disease stage, comorbidities, prior treatments, family history
  • Current medications (for DDI and PGx), stratification goal

Disease Type Classification

Classify into one category (determines Phase 3 routing):

Category Examples
CANCER Breast, lung, colorectal, melanoma
METABOLIC Type 2 diabetes, obesity, NAFLD
CARDIOVASCULAR CAD, heart failure, AF
NEUROLOGICAL Alzheimer, Parkinson, epilepsy
RARE/MONOGENIC Marfan, CF, sickle cell, Huntington
AUTOIMMUNE RA, lupus, MS, Crohn's

Critical Tool Parameter Notes

See TOOLS_REFERENCE.md for full details. Key gotchas:

  • MyGene_query_genes: param is query (NOT q)
  • EnsemblVEP_annotate_rsid: param is variant_id (NOT rsid)
  • ensembl_lookup_gene: REQUIRES species='homo_sapiens'
  • DrugBank tools: ALL require 4 params: query, case_sensitive, exact_match, limit
  • cBioPortal_get_mutations: gene_list is a STRING (space-separated), not array
  • PubMed_search_articles: Returns a plain list of dicts, NOT {articles: [...]}
  • fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers: Use limit=1000 for all results
  • gnomAD: May return "Service overloaded" - skip gracefully
  • OpenTargets: Always nested {data: {entity: {field: ...}}} structure

Workflow Overview

Phase 1: Disease Disambiguation & Profile Standardization
Phase 2: Genetic Risk Assessment
Phase 3: Disease-Specific Molecular Stratification (routes by disease type)
Phase 4: Pharmacogenomic Profiling
Phase 5: Comorbidity & Drug Interaction Risk
Phase 6: Molecular Pathway Analysis
Phase 7: Clinical Evidence & Guidelines
Phase 8: Clinical Trial Matching
Phase 9: Integrated Scoring & Recommendations

Phase 1: Disease Disambiguation & Profile Standardization

  1. Resolve disease to EFO ID using OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name
  2. Classify disease type (CANCER/METABOLIC/CVD/NEUROLOGICAL/RARE/AUTOIMMUNE)
  3. Parse genomic data into structured format (gene, variant, type)
  4. Resolve gene IDs using MyGene_query_genes to get Ensembl/Entrez IDs

Phase 2: Genetic Risk Assessment

  1. Germline variant pathogenicity: ClinVar_search_variants, EnsemblVEP_annotate_rsid/_hgvs
  2. Gene-disease association: OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence
  3. GWAS polygenic risk: gwas_get_associations_for_trait, OpenTargets_search_gwas_studies_by_disease
  4. Population frequency: gnomad_get_variant
  5. Gene constraint: gnomad_get_gene_constraints (pLI, LOEUF scores)

Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for genetic risk score component (0-35 points).

Phase 3: Disease-Specific Molecular Stratification

CANCER PATH

  1. Molecular subtyping: cBioPortal_get_mutations, HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene
  2. TMB/MSI/HRD: fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers for FDA cutoffs
  3. Prognostic stratification: Combine stage + molecular features

METABOLIC PATH

  1. Genetic risk integration: GWAS_search_associations_by_gene, OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence
  2. Complication risk: Based on HbA1c, duration, existing complications

CVD PATH

  1. FH gene check: ClinVar_search_variants for LDLR, APOB, PCSK9
  2. Statin PGx: PharmGKB_get_clinical_annotations for SLCO1B1

RARE DISEASE PATH

  1. Causal variant identification: ClinVar_search_variants
  2. Genotype-phenotype: UniProt_get_disease_variants_by_accession

Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for disease-specific tables.

Phase 4: Pharmacogenomic Profiling

  1. Drug-metabolizing enzymes: PharmGKB_get_clinical_annotations, PharmGKB_get_dosing_guidelines
  2. FDA PGx biomarkers: fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers (use limit=1000)
  3. Treatment-specific PGx: PharmGKB_get_drug_details

Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for PGx risk score (0-10 points).

Phase 5: Comorbidity & Drug Interaction Risk

  1. Disease overlap: OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_disease_efoId
  2. DDI check: drugbank_get_drug_interactions_by_drug_name_or_id, FDA_get_drug_interactions_by_drug_name
  3. PGx-amplified DDI: If PM genotype + CYP inhibitor, flag compounded risk

Phase 6: Molecular Pathway Analysis

  1. Pathway enrichment: enrichr_gene_enrichment_analysis (libs: KEGG_2021_Human, Reactome_2022, GO_Biological_Process_2023)
  2. Reactome mapping: ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways
  3. Network analysis: STRING_get_interaction_partners, STRING_functional_enrichment
  4. Druggable targets: OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID

Phase 7: Clinical Evidence & Guidelines

  1. Guidelines search: PubMed_Guidelines_Search (fallback: PubMed_search_articles)
  2. FDA-approved therapies: OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_disease_efoId, FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name
  3. Biomarker-drug evidence: civic_search_evidence_items, civic_search_assertions

Phase 8: Clinical Trial Matching

  1. Biomarker-driven trials: search_clinical_trials with condition + intervention
  2. Precision medicine trials: search_clinical_trials for basket/umbrella trials

Phase 9: Integrated Scoring & Recommendations

Score Components (total 0-100)

  • Genetic Risk (0-35): Pathogenicity + gene-disease association + PRS
  • Clinical Risk (0-30): Stage/biomarkers/comorbidities
  • Molecular Features (0-25): Driver mutations, subtypes, actionable targets
  • Pharmacogenomic Risk (0-10): Metabolizer status, HLA alleles

Risk Tiers

Score Tier Management
75-100 VERY HIGH Intensive treatment, subspecialty referral, clinical trial
50-74 HIGH Aggressive treatment, close monitoring
25-49 INTERMEDIATE Standard guideline-based care, PGx-guided dosing
0-24 LOW Surveillance, prevention, risk factor modification

Output

Generate report per REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for detailed scoring matrices.


Common Use Patterns

See EXAMPLES.md for six detailed worked examples:

  1. Cancer + actionable mutation: Breast cancer, BRCA1, ER+/HER2- -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
  2. Metabolic + PGx concern: T2D, CYP2C19 PM on clopidogrel -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
  3. NSCLC comprehensive: EGFR L858R, TMB 25, PD-L1 80% -> Score ~75-85 (VERY HIGH)
  4. CVD risk: LDL 190, SLCO1B1*5, family hx MI -> Score ~50-60 (HIGH)
  5. Rare disease: Marfan, FBN1 variant -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
  6. Neurological risk: APOE e4/e4, family hx Alzheimer's -> Score ~60-72 (HIGH)
how to use tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification

How to use tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification

The skills CLI fetches tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification from GitHub repository mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification

Reload or restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.826 reviews
  • Harper Abbas· Dec 20, 2024

    tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024

    tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Dev Bhatia· Dec 4, 2024

    Useful defaults in tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024

    We added tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Arya Martinez· Nov 23, 2024

    tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kwame Wang· Nov 11, 2024

    tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 14, 2024

    tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Daniel Flores· Oct 14, 2024

    Keeps context tight: tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Harper White· Oct 2, 2024

    We added tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 26

1 / 3