When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontooluniverse-gene-enrichmentExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tooluniverse-gene-enrichment from mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-gene-enrichment. Access via /tooluniverse-gene-enrichment in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
1.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
1.2K
stars
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Perform comprehensive gene enrichment analysis including Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, and MSigDB enrichment using both Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Integrates local computation via gseapy with ToolUniverse pathway databases for cross-validated, publication-ready results.
IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (gene names, pathway names, organism names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
Enrichment results are only as good as your background. The default background (all annotated genes in the genome) inflates enrichment for tissue-specific or context-specific gene lists. Always consider: what is the appropriate background for this experiment? For brain RNA-seq, use brain-expressed genes as background; for a proteomics experiment, use detected proteins. A gene that is never expressed in your system cannot be a true negative control.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: adjusted p-values, gene set overlap counts, and which genes from your input list drive each enriched term. Always retrieve the inputGenes field from enrichment results — do not assume which genes caused a term to be significant. When a term looks surprising, verify by checking which genes overlap.
Apply when users:
NOT for (use other skills instead):
tooluniverse-network-pharmacologytooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterizationtooluniverse-disease-researchtooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysistooluniverse-protein-interactions| Parameter | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| gene_list | Yes | List of gene symbols, Ensembl IDs, or Entrez IDs | ["TP53", "BRCA1", "EGFR"] |
| organism | No | Organism (default: human). Supported: human, mouse, rat, fly, worm, yeast, zebrafish | human |
| analysis_type | No | ORA (default) or GSEA |
ORA |
| enrichment_databases | No | Which databases to query. Default: all applicable | ["GO_BP", "GO_MF", "GO_CC", "KEGG", "Reactome"] |
| gene_id_type | No | Input ID type: symbol, ensembl, entrez, uniprot (auto-detected if omitted) |
symbol |
| p_value_cutoff | No | Significance threshold (default: 0.05) | 0.05 |
| correction_method | No | Multiple testing: BH (Benjamini-Hochberg, default), bonferroni, fdr |
BH |
| background_genes | No | Custom background gene set (default: genome-wide) | ["GENE1", "GENE2", ...] |
| ranked_gene_list | No | For GSEA: gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC) | {"TP53": 2.5, "BRCA1": -1.3, ...} |
Q: Do you have a ranked gene list (with scores/fold-changes)?
YES → Use GSEA (gseapy.prerank)
- Input: Gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC)
- Statistics: Running enrichment score, permutation test
- Cutoff: FDR q-val < 0.25 (standard for GSEA)
- Output: NES (Normalized Enrichment Score), lead genes
See: references/gsea_workflow.md
NO → Use ORA (gseapy.enrichr)
- Input: Gene list only
- Statistics: Fisher's exact test, hypergeometric
- Cutoff: Adjusted P-value < 0.05 (or user specified)
- Output: P-value, adjusted P-value, overlap, odds ratio
See: references/ora_workflow.md
Q: Which enrichment method should I use?
Primary Analysis (ALWAYS):
├─ gseapy.enrichr (ORA) OR gseapy.prerank (GSEA)
│ - Most comprehensive (225+ Enrichr libraries)
│ - GO (BP, MF, CC), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, MSigDB
│ - All organisms supported
│ - Returns: P-value, Adjusted P-value, Overlap, Genes
│ See: references/enrichr_guide.md
Cross-Validation (REQUIRED for publication):
├─ PANTHER_enrichment [T1 - curated]
│ - Curated GO enrichment
│ - Multiple organisms (taxonomy ID)
│ - GO BP, MF, CC, PANTHER pathways, Reactome
│
├─ STRING_functional_enrichment [T2 - validated]
│ - Returns ALL categories in one call
│ - Filter by category: Process, Function, Component, KEGG, Reactome
│ - Network-based enrichment
│
└─ ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment [T1 - curated]
- Reactome curated pathways
- Cross-species projection
- Detailed pathway hierarchy
Additional Context (Optional):
├─ GO_get_term_by_id, QuickGO_get_term_detail (GO term details)
├─ Reactome_get_pathway, Reactome_get_pathway_hierarchy (pathway context)
├─ WikiPathways_search, WikiPathways_get_pathway (community pathways)
└─ STRING_ppi_enrichment (network topology analysis)
MyGene_batch_query (fields: symbol,entrezgene,ensembl.gene) then STRING_map_identifiers to get canonical symbols. Auto-detect: ENSG* = Ensembl, numeric = Entrez, else = Symbol.gseapy.enrichr() for ORA (gene list), gseapy.prerank() for GSEA (ranked list with scores). Use background=background_genes — do not leave as genome-wide default if your experiment has a specific expressed gene set.PANTHER_enrichment (param: comma-sep gene_list, annotation_dataset='GO:0008150') and ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment (param: space-sep identifiers). STRING_functional_enrichment returns all categories — filter by category field.inputGenes for each significant term. Note consensus terms (significant in 2+ sources).See: references/ for complete code examples (ora_workflow.md, gsea_workflow.md, cross_validation.md)
| Tier | Symbol | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | [T1] | Curated/experimental enrichment | PANTHER, Reactome Analysis Service |
| T2 | [T2] | Computational enrichment, well-validated | gseapy ORA/GSEA, STRING functional enrichment |
| T3 | [T3] | Text-mining/predicted enrichment | Enrichr non-curated libraries |
| T4 | [T4] | Single-source annotation | Individual gene GO annotations from QuickGO |
Core organisms: human (9606), mouse (10090), rat (10116), fly (7227), worm (6239), yeast (4932). gseapy has full human/mouse support; other organisms are limited — use PANTHER or STRING for non-human enrichment.
See: references/organism_support.md for organism-specific libraries
Input: List of differentially expressed gene symbols
Flow: ID validation → gseapy ORA (GO + KEGG + Reactome) →
PANTHER + STRING cross-validation → Report top enriched terms
Use: When you have unranked gene list from DESeq2/edgeR
Input: Gene-to-log2FC mapping from differential expression
Flow: Convert to ranked Series → gseapy GSEA (GO + KEGG + MSigDB) →
Filter by FDR < 0.25 → Report NES and lead genes
Use: When you have fold-changes or other ranking metric
Input: Specific question about enrichment (e.g., "What is the adjusted p-val for neutrophil activation?")
Flow: Parse question for gene list and library → Run gseapy with exact library →
Find specific term → Report exact p-value and adjusted p-value
Use: When answering targeted questions about specific terms
Input: Gene list from mouse experiment
Flow: Use organism='mouse' for gseapy → organism=10090 for PANTHER/STRING →
projection=True for Reactome human pathway mapping
Use: When working with non-human organisms
See: references/common_patterns.md for more examples
"No significant enrichment found":
"Gene not found" errors:
"STRING returns all categories":
d['category'] == 'Process' after receiving resultsSee: references/troubleshooting.md for complete guide
| Tool | Input | Output | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
gseapy.enrichr() |
gene_list, gene_sets, organism | .results DataFrame |
ORA with 225+ libraries |
gseapy.prerank() |
rnk (ranked Series), gene_sets | .res2d DataFrame |
GSEA analysis |
| Tool | Key Parameters | Evidence Grade |
|---|---|---|
PANTHER_enrichment |
gene_list (comma-sep), organism, annotation_dataset | [T1] |
STRING_functional_enrichment |
protein_ids, species | [T2] |
ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment |
identifiers (space-sep), page_size | [T1] |
| Tool | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
MyGene_batch_query |
gene_ids, fields | Symbol, Entrez, Ensembl mappings |
STRING_map_identifiers |
protein_ids, species | Preferred names, STRING IDs |
See: references/tool_parameters.md for complete parameter documentation
All detailed examples, code blocks, and advanced topics have been moved to references/:
Helper scripts:
For network-level analysis: tooluniverse-network-pharmacology For disease characterization: tooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterization For spatial omics: tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis For protein interactions: tooluniverse-protein-interactions
gseapy documentation: https://gseapy.readthedocs.io/ PANTHER API: http://pantherdb.org/services/oai/pantherdb/ STRING API: https://string-db.org/cgi/help?sessionId=&subpage=api Reactome Analysis: https://reactome.org/AnalysisService/
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-gene-enrichment — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: tooluniverse-gene-enrichment is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend tooluniverse-gene-enrichment for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added tooluniverse-gene-enrichment from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-gene-enrichment — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for tooluniverse-gene-enrichment matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 73