Validate drug target hypotheses using multi-dimensional computational evidence before committing to wet-lab work. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with priority tier classification and GO/NO-GO recommendation.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontooluniverse-drug-target-validationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tooluniverse-drug-target-validation from mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-drug-target-validation. Access via /tooluniverse-drug-target-validation in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
1.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
1.2K
stars
Validate drug target hypotheses using multi-dimensional computational evidence before committing to wet-lab work. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with priority tier classification and GO/NO-GO recommendation.
A valid drug target must pass 4 gates in order. Failing an early gate makes later gates irrelevant:
Do not proceed to Phase 3 (Chemical Matter) before completing Phase 1 (Disease Association). Gate 1 failures should prompt a NO-GO or pivot recommendation.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume a target is druggable based on its protein family alone, never assume expression is low in a tissue without checking GTEx or HPA, never assume no competitors without searching ClinicalTrials.gov.
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Apply when users ask about:
Not for (use other skills): general target biology (tooluniverse-target-research), drug compound profiling (tooluniverse-drug-research), variant interpretation (tooluniverse-variant-interpretation), disease research (tooluniverse-disease-research).
| Parameter | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| target | Yes | Gene symbol, protein name, or UniProt ID | EGFR, P00533 |
| disease | No | Disease/indication for context | Non-small cell lung cancer |
| modality | No | Preferred therapeutic modality | small molecule, antibody, PROTAC |
Total: 0-100 points across 5 dimensions (details in SCORING_CRITERIA.md):
| Dimension | Max | Sub-dimensions |
|---|---|---|
| Disease Association | 30 | Genetic (10) + Literature (10) + Pathway (10) |
| Druggability | 25 | Structure (10) + Chemical matter (10) + Target class (5) |
| Safety Profile | 20 | Expression (5) + Genetic validation (10) + ADRs (5) |
| Clinical Precedent | 15 | Based on highest clinical stage achieved |
| Validation Evidence | 10 | Functional studies (5) + Disease models (5) |
Priority Tiers: 80-100 = Tier 1 (GO) | 60-79 = Tier 2 (CONDITIONAL GO) | 40-59 = Tier 3 (CAUTION) | 0-39 = Tier 4 (NO-GO)
Evidence Grades: T1 (clinical proof) > T2 (functional studies) > T3 (associations) > T4 (predictions)
Resolve target to ALL identifiers before any analysis.
Steps:
MyGene_query_genes - Get initial IDs (Ensembl, UniProt, Entrez)ensembl_lookup_gene - Get versioned Ensembl ID (species="homo_sapiens" REQUIRED)ensembl_get_xrefs - Cross-references (HGNC, etc.)OpenTargets_get_target_id_description_by_name - Verify OT targetChEMBL_search_targets - Get ChEMBL target IDUniProt_get_function_by_accession - Function summary (returns list of strings)UniProt_get_alternative_names_by_accession - Collision detectionOutput: Table of verified identifiers (Gene Symbol, Ensembl, UniProt, Entrez, ChEMBL, HGNC) plus protein function and target class.
Quantify target-disease association from genetic, literature, and pathway evidence.
Key tools:
OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl - Disease associationsOpenTargets_target_disease_evidence - Detailed evidence (needs efoId + ensemblId)OpenTargets_get_evidence_by_datasource - Evidence by data sourcegwas_get_snps_for_gene / gwas_search_studies - GWAS evidencegnomad_get_gene_constraints - Genetic constraint (pLI, LOEUF)PubMed_search_articles - Literature (returns plain list of dicts)OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblID - OT publications (uses entityId)Assess whether the target is amenable to therapeutic intervention.
Key tools:
OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID - Tractability (SM, AB, PR, OC)OpenTargets_get_target_classes_by_ensemblID - Target classificationPharos_get_target - TDL: Tclin > Tchem > Tbio > TdarkDGIdb_get_gene_druggability - Druggability categoriesalphafold_get_prediction (param: qualifier) / alphafold_get_summaryProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites - Pocket detectionOpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblID - Chemical probesOpenTargets_get_target_enabling_packages_by_ensemblID - TEPsTCDB_get_transporter - For SLC/ABC transporter targets: TC classification, family, PDB structures (param: uniprot_accession)TCDB_search_by_substrate - Find transporters by substrate (param: substrate_name)Identify existing chemical starting points for target validation.
Key tools:
ChEMBL_search_targets + ChEMBL_get_target_activities - Bioactivity data (note: target_chembl_id__exact with double underscore)BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot - Binding data (affinity in nM)PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene + PubChem_get_assay_active_compounds - HTS dataOpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID - Known drugs (size REQUIRED)ChEMBL_search_mechanisms - Drug mechanismsDGIdb_get_gene_info - Drug-gene interactionsAssess clinical validation from approved drugs and clinical trials.
Key tools:
FDA_get_mechanism_of_action_by_drug_name / FDA_get_indications_by_drug_namedrugbank_get_targets_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id (ALL params required: query, case_sensitive, exact_match, limit)search_clinical_trials (query_term REQUIRED)OpenTargets_get_drug_warnings_by_chemblId / OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblIdIdentify safety risks from expression, genetics, and known adverse events.
Key tools:
OpenTargets_get_target_safety_profile_by_ensemblID - Safety liabilitiesGTEx_get_median_gene_expression - Tissue expression (operation="median" REQUIRED)HPA_search_genes_by_query / HPA_get_comprehensive_gene_details_by_ensembl_idOpenTargets_get_biological_mouse_models_by_ensemblID - KO phenotypesFDA_get_adverse_reactions_by_drug_name / FDA_get_boxed_warning_info_by_drug_nameOpenTargets_get_target_homologues_by_ensemblID - Paralog risksCritical tissues to check: heart, liver, kidney, brain, bone marrow.
Understand the target's role in biological networks and disease pathways.
Key tools:
Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways (param: id, NOT uniprot_id)STRING_get_protein_interactions (param: protein_ids as array, species=9606)intact_get_interactions - Experimental PPIOpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_by_ensemblID - GO termsSTRING_functional_enrichment - Enrichment analysisAssess: pathway redundancy, compensation risk, feedback loops.
Assess existing functional validation data.
Key tools:
DepMap_get_gene_dependencies - Essentiality (score < -0.5 = essential)PubMed_search_articles - Search for CRISPR/siRNA/knockout studiesCTD_get_gene_diseases - Gene-disease associationsLeverage structural biology for druggability and mechanism understanding.
Key tools:
UniProt_get_entry_by_accession - Extract PDB cross-referencesget_protein_metadata_by_pdb_id / pdbe_get_entry_summary / pdbe_get_entry_qualityalphafold_get_prediction / alphafold_get_summary - pLDDT confidenceProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites - Druggable pocketsInterPro_get_protein_domains / InterPro_get_domain_details - Domain architectureComprehensive collision-aware literature analysis.
Steps:
"{gene_symbol}"[Title] in PubMed; if >20% off-topic, add filters (AND protein OR gene OR receptor)review[pt] filter in PubMedopenalex_search_works for impact dataEuropePMC_search_articlesSynthesize all phases into actionable output:
Create file: [TARGET]_[DISEASE]_validation_report.md
Use the full template from REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. Key sections:
Complete the Completeness Checklist (in REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) before finalizing to verify all phases were covered, all scores justified, and negative results documented.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-drug-target-validation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: tooluniverse-drug-target-validation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added tooluniverse-drug-target-validation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend tooluniverse-drug-target-validation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend tooluniverse-drug-target-validation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
tooluniverse-drug-target-validation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for tooluniverse-drug-target-validation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: tooluniverse-drug-target-validation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
tooluniverse-drug-target-validation has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-drug-target-validation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 44