sensei

microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure · updated May 7, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure --skill sensei
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Iteratively improve skill frontmatter compliance and test coverage using the Ralph loop pattern.

  • Automates a 10-step feedback loop: read skill metadata, score compliance against the agentskills.io spec, scaffold missing tests, improve frontmatter triggers, run tests, validate references, check token budgets, and prompt for commit/issue creation
  • Targets Medium-High compliance: distinctive WHEN: trigger phrases, descriptions under 60 words, passing tests, and token budgets under 500 lines
skill.md

Sensei

"A true master teaches not by telling, but by refining." - The Skill Sensei

Automates skill frontmatter improvement using the Ralph loop pattern - iteratively improving skills until they reach Medium-High compliance with passing tests, then checking token usage and prompting for action.

Help

When user says "sensei help" or asks how to use sensei, show this:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║  SENSEI - Skill Frontmatter Compliance Improver                  ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║                                                                  ║
║  USAGE:                                                          ║
║    Run sensei on <skill-name>              # Single skill        ║
║    Run sensei on <skill-name> --skip-integration  # Fast mode    ║
║    Run sensei on <skill1>, <skill2>, ...   # Multiple skills     ║
║    Run sensei on all Low-adherence skills  # Batch by score      ║
║    Run sensei on all skills                # All skills       ║
║                                                                  ║
║  EXAMPLES:                                                       ║
║    Run sensei on appinsights-instrumentation                     ║
║    Run sensei on azure-security --skip-integration               ║
║    Run sensei on azure-security, azure-observability             ║
║    Run sensei on all Low-adherence skills                        ║
║                                                                  ║
║  WHAT IT DOES:                                                   ║
║    1. READ      - Load skill's SKILL.md, tests, and token count  ║
║    2. SCORE     - Check compliance (Low/Medium/Medium-High/High) ║
║    3. SCAFFOLD  - Create tests from template if missing          ║
║    4. IMPROVE   - Add WHEN: triggers (cross-model optimized)     ║
║    5. TEST      - Run tests, fix if needed                       ║
║    6. REFERENCES- Validate markdown links                        ║
║    7. TOKENS    - Check token budget, gather suggestions         ║
║    8. SUMMARY   - Show before/after with suggestions             ║
║    9. PROMPT    - Ask: Commit, Create Issue, or Skip?            ║
║   10. REPEAT    - Until Medium-High score + tests pass           ║
║                                                                  ║
║  TARGET SCORE: Medium-High                                       ║
║    ✓ Description > 150 chars, ≤ 60 words                         ║
║    ✓ Has "WHEN:" trigger phrases (preferred)                     ║
║    ✓ No "DO NOT USE FOR:" (unless disambiguation-critical)         ║
║    ✓ SKILL.md < 500 tokens (soft limit)                          ║
║                                                                  ║
║  MORE INFO:                                                      ║
║    See .github/skills/sensei/README.md for full documentation    ║
║                                                                  ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

When to Use

  • Improving a skill's frontmatter compliance score
  • Adding trigger phrases and anti-triggers to skill descriptions
  • Batch-improving multiple skills at once
  • Auditing and fixing Low-adherence skills

Invocation Modes

Single Skill

Run sensei on azure-deploy

Multiple Skills

Run sensei on azure-security, azure-observability

By Adherence Level

Run sensei on all Low-adherence skills

All Skills

Run sensei on all skills

GEPA Mode (Deep Optimization)

Run sensei on my-skill --gepa
Run sensei on my-skill --gepa --skip-integration
Run sensei on all skills --gepa

When --gepa is used, Step 5 (IMPROVE) is replaced with GEPA evolutionary optimization. Instead of template-based improvements, GEPA parses trigger prompt arrays from the existing test harness and combines them with content quality heuristics to build a fitness function. An LLM proposes and evaluates many candidate improvements automatically. Note: GEPA does not execute Jest tests directly — it uses the test data (prompts) as evaluation inputs.

GEPA score-only mode (no LLM calls, just evaluate current quality):

Run sensei score my-skill
Run sensei score all skills

The Ralph Loop

For each skill, execute this loop until score >= Medium-High AND tests pass:

  1. READ - Load plugin/skills/{skill-name}/SKILL.md, tests, and token count
  2. SCORE - Run spec-based compliance check (see SCORING.md):
    • Validate name per agentskills.io spec (no --, no start/end -, lowercase alphanumeric)
    • Check description length and word count (≤60 words)
    • Check triggers (WHEN: preferred, USE FOR: accepted)
    • Warn on "DO NOT USE FOR:" (risky in multi-skill environments — exception: REQUIRED for skills that share trigger overlap with broader skills like azure-prepare)
    • Preserve optional spec fields (license, metadata, allowed-tools) if present
  3. CHECK - If score >= Medium-High AND tests pass → go to TOKENS step
  4. SCAFFOLD - If tests/{skill-name}/ doesn't exist, create from tests/_template/
  5. IMPROVE FRONTMATTER - Add WHEN: triggers (stay under 60 words and 1024 chars) 5b. IMPROVE WITH GEPA (when --gepa flag is set) — Replaces step 5 (IMPROVE FRONTMATTER) with automated optimization; step 6 (IMPROVE TESTS) still runs normally:
    • Auto-discovers tests/{skill-name}/triggers.test.ts and extracts prompt arrays
    • Builds a GEPA evaluator scoring content quality + trigger accuracy based on those trigger prompt arrays (not Jest test pass/fail results)
    • Runs python .github/skills/sensei/scripts/gepa/auto_evaluator.py optimize --skill {skill-name} --skills-dir plugin/skills --tests-dir tests
    • Shows diff of optimized SKILL.md for user approval
    • GEPA uses existing test trigger definitions as configuration — it does not execute, replace, or modify Jest tests
  6. IMPROVE TESTS - Update shouldTriggerPrompts and shouldNotTriggerPrompts to match the finalized frontmatter (including any GEPA changes)
  7. VERIFY - Run cd tests && npm test -- --testPathPatterns={skill-name}
  8. VALIDATE REFERENCES - Run cd scripts && npm run references {skill-name} to check markdown links
  9. TOKENS - Check token budget and line count (< 500 lines per spec), gather optimization suggestions
  10. SUMMARY - Display before/after comparison with unimplemented suggestions
  11. PROMPT - Ask user: Commit, Create Issue, or Skip?
  12. REPEAT - Go to step 2 (max 5 iterations per skill)

Scoring Criteria (Quick Reference)

Sensei validates skills against the agentskills.io specification. See SCORING.md for full details.

Score Requirements
Invalid Name fails spec validation (consecutive hyphens, start/end hyphen, uppercase, etc.)
Low Basic description, no explicit triggers
Medium Has trigger keywords/phrases, description > 150 chars, >60 words
Medium-High Has "WHEN:" (preferred) or "USE FOR:" triggers, ≤60 words
High Medium-High + compatibility field

Target: Medium-High (distinctive triggers, concise description)

⚠️ "DO NOT USE FOR:" is risky in multi-skill environments (15+ overlapping skills) — causes keyword contamination on fast-pattern-matching models. Safe for small, isolated skill sets. Use positive routing with WHEN: for cross-model safety.

Exception — disambiguation-critical skills: When a skill's USE FOR triggers directly overlap with a broader skill (e.g., azure-prepare owns "deploy to Azure"), DO NOT USE FOR: is REQUIRED to prevent the broader skill from capturing prompts that belong to the specialized skill. Removing it causes routing regressions. Integration tests validate this routing -- run them before removing any DO NOT USE FOR: clause.

Strongly recommended (reported as suggestions if missing):

  • license — identifies the license applied to the skill
  • metadata.version — tracks the skill version for consumers

Frontmatter Template

Per the agentskills.io spec, required and optional fields:

---
name: skill-name
description: "[ACTION VERB] [UNIQUE_DOMAIN]. [One clarifying sentence]. WHEN: \"trigger 1\", \"trigger 2\", \"trigger 3\"."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: "1.0"
# Other optional spec fields — preserve if already present:
# metadata.author: example-org
# allowed-tools: Bash(git:*) Read
---

IMPORTANT: Use inline double-quoted strings for descriptions. Do NOT use >- folded scalars (incompatible with skills.sh). Do NOT use | literal blocks (preserves newlines). Keep total description under 1024 characters and ≤60 words.

⚠️ "DO NOT USE FOR:" carries context-dependent risk. In multi-skill environments (10+ skills with overlapping domains), anti-trigger clauses introduce the very keywords that cause wrong-skill activation on Claude Sonnet and fast-pattern-matching models (evidence). For small, isolated skill sets (1-5 skills), the risk is low. When in doubt, use positive routing with WHEN: and distinctive quoted phrases.

Exception: DO NOT USE FOR: is REQUIRED when a specialized skill's triggers overlap with a broader skill (e.g., azure-hosted-copilot-sdk vs. azure-prepare on "deploy to Azure"). Without the negative discriminator, the broader skill captures prompts that should route to the specialized one. Always run integration tests before removing a DO NOT USE FOR: clause.

Test Scaffolding

When tests don't exist, scaffold from tests/_template/:

cp -r tests/_template tests/{skill-name}

Then update:

  1. SKILL_NAME constant in all test files
  2. shouldTriggerPrompts - 5+ prompts matching new frontmatter triggers
  3. shouldNotTriggerPrompts - 5+ prompts matching anti-triggers

Commit Messages:

sensei: improve {skill-name} frontmatter

Constraints

  • Only modify plugin/skills/ - these are the Azure skills used by Copilot
  • .github/skills/ contains meta-skills like sensei for developer tooling
  • Max 5 iterations per skill before moving on
  • Description must stay under 1024 characters
  • SKILL.md should stay under 500 tokens (soft limit)
  • Tests must pass before prompting for action
  • User chooses: Commit, Create Issue, or Skip after each skill

Flags

Flag Description
--skip-integration Skip integration tests for faster iteration. Only runs unit and trigger tests.
--gepa Use GEPA evolutionary optimization instead of template-based improvement. Auto-discovers tests and builds evaluator at runtime.

⚠️ Skipping integration tests speeds up the loop but may miss runtime issues. Consider running full tests before final commit.

Reference Documentation

Related Skills

how to use sensei

How to use sensei on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sensei
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure --skill sensei

The skills CLI fetches sensei from GitHub repository microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sensei

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sensei. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sensei) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.825 reviews
  • Kiara Wang· Dec 20, 2024

    sensei has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Mia Menon· Dec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in sensei — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024

    sensei fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for sensei matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Oct 18, 2024

    sensei reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Arjun Kim· Sep 17, 2024

    sensei fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 9, 2024

    I recommend sensei for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Aug 28, 2024

    Useful defaults in sensei — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Arjun White· Aug 8, 2024

    We added sensei from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Arya Chawla· Jul 27, 2024

    sensei reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 25

1 / 3