implement-paper

marimo-team/skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/marimo-team/skills --skill implement-paper
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Turn a research paper into an interactive marimo notebook. For general marimo notebook conventions (cell structure, PEP 723 metadata, output rendering, marimo check, variable naming, etc.), refer to the marimo-notebook skill.

skill.md

Implement Paper

Turn a research paper into an interactive marimo notebook. For general marimo notebook conventions (cell structure, PEP 723 metadata, output rendering, marimo check, variable naming, etc.), refer to the marimo-notebook skill.

Step 1: Understand what the user wants

Before fetching or reading anything, have a short conversation to scope the work. Ask the user:

  • Which part of the paper interests you most? A paper may have multiple contributions — the user likely cares about one or two. Don't implement the whole thing.
  • What's the goal? Are they trying to understand the method, reproduce a result, adapt it to their own data, or teach it to someone else? This changes the notebook's tone and depth.
  • Do they want to use a specific dataset? If it's relevant, ask. Otherwise, suggest simulating data.
  • Does this require PyTorch? Some papers need it, many don't. Ask if unclear — it's a heavy dependency.
  • What's their background? The paper aims to fill a knowledge gap — gauge what the user already knows so the notebook can meet them where they are. Skip basics they're familiar with, explain prerequisites they're not.

Only move on once you have a clear picture of what to build.

Step 2: Fetch the paper

If the user gives you an Arxiv/AlphaXiv link, you will an efficient way to read the paper.

See references/fetching-papers.md for how to retrieve paper content via alphaxiv.org. This avoids reading raw PDFs and gives you structured markdown.

Step 3: Plan the notebook

After reading the paper, outline the notebook structure for the user before writing code.

Keep the notebook as small as possible. Sometimes the idea is best conveyed with just a single interactive widget — if you need a custom one, consider the anywidget skill. Other times you need a full training loop — if so, consider using the marimo-batch skill for heavy computation. The goal is the minimum amount of code needed to get the idea across.

A typical arc:

Section Purpose Typical elements
Title & context Orient the reader mo.md() with paper title, authors, link
Background Set up prerequisites Markdown + equations
Method Core algorithm step-by-step Code + markdown interleaved
Experiments Reproduce key results Interactive widgets + plots
Conclusion Summarize takeaways mo.md()

Not every notebook needs all sections. Share the outline with the user and adjust before writing code.

Step 4: Build the notebook

Create the marimo notebook following the marimo-notebook skill conventions.

Key guidelines:

  • Never assume the dataset. Use whatever the user specified in Step 1. If they didn't specify one, simulate data.
  • Make it self-contained. A reader should understand the notebook without reading the full paper.
  • Use KaTeX for equations. Render key equations with mo.md(r"""$...$""") so the notebook mirrors the paper's notation. Keep notation consistent with the paper.
  • Add interactivity where it aids understanding. Sliders for hyperparameters, dropdowns for dataset variants, or toggles for ablations help readers build intuition.
  • Show, don't just tell. Prefer a plot or table over a paragraph of explanation.
  • Name variables to match the paper's notation where practical (e.g., alpha, X, W), and add comments mapping them to equation numbers.

Tips

  • Don't reproduce the entire paper. Focus on what the user asked about in Step 1.
  • Iterate visually. Build up figures incrementally (e.g., show data → show model fit → show residuals) rather than dumping everything into one plot.
  • If the paper uses heavy notation, include a small "notation reference" cell with a markdown table mapping symbols to descriptions.

If the user wants a custom anywidget, refer to references/ANYWIDGET.md.

how to use implement-paper

How to use implement-paper on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add implement-paper
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/marimo-team/skills --skill implement-paper

The skills CLI fetches implement-paper from GitHub repository marimo-team/skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/implement-paper

Reload or restart Cursor to activate implement-paper. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /implement-paper) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.730 reviews
  • Emma Ramirez· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: implement-paper is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Emma Abbas· Nov 19, 2024

    We added implement-paper from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Olivia Desai· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: implement-paper is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Anika Brown· Oct 10, 2024

    implement-paper fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Liam Ndlovu· Oct 2, 2024

    implement-paper is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Mia Sharma· Sep 21, 2024

    implement-paper reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 1, 2024

    implement-paper has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Hana Chawla· Sep 1, 2024

    Registry listing for implement-paper matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Aug 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: implement-paper is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Kwame Abebe· Aug 20, 2024

    implement-paper reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 30

1 / 3