linear▌
lobehub/lobe-chat · updated Apr 8, 2026
Before using Linear workflows, search for linear MCP tools. If not found, treat as not installed.
Linear Issue Management
Before using Linear workflows, search for linear MCP tools. If not found, treat as not installed.
⚠️ CRITICAL: PR Creation with Linear Issues
When creating a PR that references Linear issues (LOBE-xxx), you MUST:
- Create the PR with magic keywords (
Fixes LOBE-xxx) - IMMEDIATELY after PR creation, add completion comments to ALL referenced Linear issues
- Do NOT consider the task complete until Linear comments are added
This is NON-NEGOTIABLE. Skipping Linear comments is a workflow violation.
Workflow
- Retrieve issue details before starting:
mcp__linear-server__get_issue - Check for sub-issues: Use
mcp__linear-server__list_issueswithparentIdfilter - Update issue status when completing:
mcp__linear-server__update_issue - Add completion comment (REQUIRED):
mcp__linear-server__create_comment
Creating Issues
When creating issues with mcp__linear-server__create_issue, MUST add the claude code label.
Completion Comment Format
Every completed issue MUST have a comment summarizing work done:
## Changes Summary
- **Feature**: Brief description of what was implemented
- **Files Changed**: List key files modified
- **PR**: #xxx or PR URL
### Key Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
This is critical for:
- Team visibility
- Code review context
- Future reference
PR Association (REQUIRED)
When creating PRs for Linear issues, include magic keywords in PR body:
Fixes LOBE-123Closes LOBE-123Resolves LOBE-123
Per-Issue Completion Rule
When working on multiple issues, update EACH issue IMMEDIATELY after completing it:
- Complete implementation
- Run
bun run type-check - Run related tests
- Create PR if needed
- Update status to "In Review" (NOT "Done")
- Add completion comment immediately
- Move to next issue
Note: Status → "In Review" when PR created. "Done" only after PR merged.
❌ Wrong: Complete all → Create PR → Forget Linear comments
✅ Correct: Complete → Create PR → Add Linear comments → Task done
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★44 reviews- ★★★★★Emma Sethi· Dec 12, 2024
linear reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Liam Patel· Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for linear matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Liam Rao· Nov 27, 2024
linear is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Xiao Okafor· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in linear — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Emma Iyer· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend linear for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diya Chen· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in linear — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Aditi Diallo· Oct 18, 2024
Keeps context tight: linear is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Aditi Abebe· Oct 14, 2024
I recommend linear for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 21, 2024
linear has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Martinez· Sep 17, 2024
linear fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 44