read-arxiv-paper▌
karpathy/nanochat · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Fetch and summarize arxiv papers from their LaTeX source code.
- ›Normalizes arxiv URLs to source format (/src/), downloads .tar.gz archives, and unpacks them locally with caching to avoid re-downloads
- ›Locates the LaTeX entrypoint (main.tex or equivalent) and recursively reads all relevant source files to reconstruct the full paper
- ›Generates markdown summaries in the local knowledge directory with contextual tags, designed for integration with the nanochat project
- ›Includes guidance f
You will be given a URL of an arxiv paper, for example:
https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2601.07372
Part 1: Normalize the URL
The goal is to fetch the TeX Source of the paper (not the PDF!), the URL always looks like this:
https://www.arxiv.org/src/2601.07372
Notice the /src/ in the url. Once you have the URL:
Part 2: Download the paper source
Fetch the url to a local .tar.gz file. A good location is ~/.cache/nanochat/knowledge/{arxiv_id}.tar.gz.
(If the file already exists, there is no need to re-download it).
Part 3: Unpack the file in that folder
Unpack the contents into ~/.cache/nanochat/knowledge/{arxiv_id} directory.
Part 4: Locate the entrypoint
Every latex source usually has an entrypoint, such as main.tex or something like that.
Part 5: Read the paper
Once you've found the entrypoint, Read the contents and then recurse through all other relevant source files to read the paper.
Part 6: Report
Once you've read the paper, produce a summary of the paper into a markdown file at ./knowledge/summary_{tag}.md. Notice that 1) use the local knowledge directory here (it's easier for me to open and reference here), not in ~/.cache, and 2) generate some reasonable tag like e.g. conditional_memory or whatever seems appropriate given the paper. Probably make sure that the tag doesn't exist yet so you're not overwriting files.
As for the summary itself, remember that you're processing this paper within the context of the nanochat repository, so most often we will be interested in how to apply the paper and its lessons to the nanochat project. Therefore, you should feel free to "remind yourself" of the related nanochat code by reading the relevant parts, and then explicitly make the connection of how this paper might relate to nanochat or what are things we might be inspired about or try.
How to use read-arxiv-paper on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add read-arxiv-paper
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches read-arxiv-paper from GitHub repository karpathy/nanochat and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate read-arxiv-paper. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /read-arxiv-paper) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★49 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for read-arxiv-paper matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sofia Kim· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend read-arxiv-paper for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Naina Srinivasan· Dec 24, 2024
We added read-arxiv-paper from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Hassan Bansal· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in read-arxiv-paper — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024
read-arxiv-paper has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Zaid Abbas· Dec 4, 2024
read-arxiv-paper reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aanya Abbas· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for read-arxiv-paper matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
read-arxiv-paper reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noah Okafor· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: read-arxiv-paper is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Olivia Liu· Nov 15, 2024
read-arxiv-paper fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 49