test-master▌
jeffallan/claude-skills · updated May 29, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Comprehensive testing specialist for functional, performance, and security test design and execution.
- ›Covers unit, integration, E2E, performance (k6, Artillery), and security testing (OWASP) with structured workflows from scope definition through reporting
- ›Enforces test quality standards: meaningful assertions, isolated dependencies, edge-case coverage, and flaky-test remediation
- ›Provides reference guides for TDD methodology, testing anti-patterns, automation frameworks, and QA pract
Test Master
Comprehensive testing specialist ensuring software quality through functional, performance, and security testing.
Core Workflow
- Define scope — Identify what to test and which testing types apply
- Create strategy — Plan the test approach across functional, performance, and security perspectives
- Write tests — Implement tests with proper assertions (see example below)
- Execute — Run tests and collect results
- If tests fail: classify the failure (assertion error vs. environment/flakiness), fix root cause, re-run
- If tests are flaky: isolate ordering dependencies, check async handling, add retry or stabilization logic
- Report — Document findings with severity ratings and actionable fix recommendations
- Verify coverage targets are met before closing; flag gaps explicitly
Quick-Start Example
A minimal Jest unit test illustrating the key patterns this skill enforces:
// ✅ Good: meaningful description, specific assertion, isolated dependency
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('applies 10% discount for premium users', () => {
const result = calculateDiscount({ price: 100, userTier: 'premium' });
expect(result).toBe(90); // specific outcome, not just truthy
});
it('throws on negative price', () => {
expect(() => calculateDiscount({ price: -1, userTier: 'standard' }))
.toThrow('Price must be non-negative');
});
});
Apply the same structure for pytest (def test_…, assert result == expected) and other frameworks.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | references/unit-testing.md |
Jest, Vitest, pytest patterns |
| Integration | references/integration-testing.md |
API testing, Supertest |
| E2E | references/e2e-testing.md |
E2E strategy, user flows |
| Performance | references/performance-testing.md |
k6, load testing |
| Security | references/security-testing.md |
Security test checklist |
| Reports | references/test-reports.md |
Report templates, findings |
| QA Methodology | references/qa-methodology.md |
Manual testing, quality advocacy, shift-left, continuous testing |
| Automation | references/automation-frameworks.md |
Framework patterns, scaling, maintenance, team enablement |
| TDD Iron Laws | references/tdd-iron-laws.md |
TDD methodology, test-first development, red-green-refactor |
| Testing Anti-Patterns | references/testing-anti-patterns.md |
Test review, mock issues, test quality problems |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Test happy paths AND error/edge cases (e.g., empty input, null, boundary values)
- Mock external dependencies — never call real APIs or databases in unit tests
- Use meaningful
it('…')descriptions that read as plain-English specifications - Assert specific outcomes (
expect(result).toBe(90)), not just truthiness - Run tests in CI/CD; document and remediate coverage gaps
MUST NOT
- Skip error-path testing (e.g., don't test only the success branch of a try/catch)
- Use production data in tests — use fixtures or factories instead
- Create order-dependent tests — each test must be independently runnable
- Ignore flaky tests — quarantine and fix them; don't just re-run until green
- Test implementation details (internal method calls) — test observable behaviour
Output Templates
When creating test plans, provide:
- Test scope and approach
- Test cases with expected outcomes
- Coverage analysis
- Findings with severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Specific fix recommendations
How to use test-master on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add test-master
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches test-master from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate test-master. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /test-master) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 20, 2024
test-master reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakura Farah· Dec 12, 2024
test-master reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ren Gill· Dec 8, 2024
test-master is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend test-master for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Noor Gupta· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend test-master for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Camila Desai· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in test-master — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 2, 2024
Useful defaults in test-master — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 21, 2024
test-master has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Nasser· Sep 13, 2024
test-master has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Lucas Rao· Sep 9, 2024
test-master reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 32