microservices-architect▌
jeffallan/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
Designs distributed system architectures, decomposes monoliths into microservices, and documents resilience patterns.
- ›Applies domain-driven design to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries; validates that each service owns its data exclusively and deploys independently
- ›Covers communication design (REST, gRPC, async messaging), data strategies (database per service, event sourcing, CQRS), and resilience patterns (circuit breakers, sagas, bulkheads, timeouts)
- ›Provides referen
Microservices Architect
Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.
Core Workflow
- Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
- Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
- Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
- Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
- Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
- Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
- Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
- Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
- Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
- Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
- Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
- Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Service Boundaries | references/decomposition.md |
Monolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD |
| Communication | references/communication.md |
REST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven |
| Resilience Patterns | references/patterns.md |
Circuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies |
| Data Management | references/data.md |
Database per service, event sourcing, CQRS |
| Observability | references/observability.md |
Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics |
Implementation Examples
Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)
const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');
function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {
req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();
res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);
// Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID
req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });
next();
}
Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.
Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)
import pybreaker
# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open state
breaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)
@breaker
def call_inventory_service(order_id: str):
response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
def get_inventory(order_id: str):
try:
return call_inventory_service(order_id)
except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:
return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}
Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)
// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.
interface SagaStep<T> {
execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;
compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;
}
async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {
const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];
let ctx = initialCtx;
for (const step of steps) {
try {
ctx = await step.execute(ctx);
completed.push(step);
} catch (err) {
for (const done of completed.reverse()) {
await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);
}
throw err;
}
}
return ctx;
}
// Usage: order creation saga
const orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];
await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });
Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/live
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/ready
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running.
/health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).
Constraints
MUST DO
- Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
- Use database per service pattern
- Implement circuit breakers for external calls
- Add correlation IDs to all requests
- Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
- Design for failure and graceful degradation
- Implement health checks and readiness probes
- Use API versioning strategies
MUST NOT DO
- Create distributed monoliths
- Share databases between services
- Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
- Skip distributed tracing implementation
- Ignore network latency and partial failures
- Create chatty service interfaces
- Store shared state without proper patterns
- Deploy without observability
Output Templates
When designing microservices architecture, provide:
- Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
- Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
- Data ownership and consistency model
- Resilience patterns for each integration point
- Deployment and infrastructure requirements
Knowledge Reference
Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★66 reviews- ★★★★★Min Sanchez· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: microservices-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for microservices-architect matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Min Ramirez· Dec 12, 2024
microservices-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Xiao Smith· Dec 8, 2024
microservices-architect fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Diego Reddy· Dec 4, 2024
microservices-architect reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Thompson· Nov 27, 2024
We added microservices-architect from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Soo Abebe· Nov 23, 2024
microservices-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Diego Li· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for microservices-architect matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ren Ramirez· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: microservices-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: microservices-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 66