sf-data

jaganpro/sf-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-data
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Use this skill when the user needs Salesforce data work: record CRUD, bulk import/export, test data generation, cleanup scripts, or data factory patterns for validating Apex, Flow, or integration behavior.

skill.md

Salesforce Data Operations Expert (sf-data)

Use this skill when the user needs Salesforce data work: record CRUD, bulk import/export, test data generation, cleanup scripts, or data factory patterns for validating Apex, Flow, or integration behavior.

When This Skill Owns the Task

Use sf-data when the work involves:

  • sf data CLI commands
  • record creation, update, delete, upsert, export, or tree import/export
  • realistic test data generation
  • bulk data operations and cleanup
  • Apex anonymous scripts for data seeding / rollback

Delegate elsewhere when the user is:


Important Mode Decision

Confirm which mode the user wants:

Mode Use when
Script generation they want reusable .apex, CSV, or JSON assets without touching an org yet
Remote execution they want records created / changed in a real org now

Do not assume remote execution if the user may only want scripts.


Required Context to Gather First

Ask for or infer:

  • target object(s)
  • org alias, if remote execution is required
  • operation type: query, create, update, delete, upsert, import, export, cleanup
  • expected volume
  • whether this is test data, migration data, or one-off troubleshooting data
  • any parent-child relationships that must exist first

Core Operating Rules

  • sf-data acts on remote org data unless the user explicitly wants local script generation.
  • Objects and fields must already exist before data creation.
  • For automation testing, prefer 251+ records when bulk behavior matters.
  • Always think about cleanup before creating large or noisy datasets.
  • Never use real PII in generated test data.
  • Prefer CLI-first for straightforward CRUD; use anonymous Apex when the operation truly needs server-side orchestration.

If metadata is missing, stop and hand off to:


Recommended Workflow

1. Verify prerequisites

Confirm object / field availability, org auth, and required parent records.

2. Run describe-first pre-flight validation when schema is uncertain

Before creating or updating records, use object describe data to validate:

  • required fields
  • createable vs non-createable fields
  • picklist values
  • relationship fields and parent requirements

Example pattern:

sf sobject describe --sobject ObjectName --target-org <alias> --json

Helpful filters:

# Required + createable fields
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.nillable==false and .createable==true) | {name, type}'

# Valid picklist values for one field
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.name=="StageName") | .picklistValues[].value'

# Fields that cannot be set on create
jq '.result.fields[] | select(.createable==false) | .name'

3. Choose the smallest correct mechanism

Need Default approach
small one-off CRUD sf data single-record commands
large import/export Bulk API 2.0 via sf data ... bulk
parent-child seed set tree import/export
reusable test dataset factory / anonymous Apex script
reversible experiment cleanup script or savepoint-based approach

4. Execute or generate assets

Use the built-in templates under assets/ when they fit:

  • assets/factories/
  • assets/bulk/
  • assets/cleanup/
  • assets/soql/
  • assets/csv/
  • assets/json/

5. Verify results

Check counts, relationships, and record IDs after creation or update.

6. Apply a bounded retry strategy

If creation fails:

  1. try the primary CLI shape once
  2. retry once with corrected parameters
  3. re-run describe / validate assumptions
  4. pivot to a different mechanism or provide a manual workaround

Do not repeat the same failing command indefinitely.

7. Leave cleanup guidance

Provide exact cleanup commands or rollback assets whenever data was created.


High-Signal Rules

Bulk safety

  • use bulk operations for large volumes
  • test automation-sensitive behavior with 251+ records where appropriate
  • avoid one-record-at-a-time patterns for bulk scenarios

Data integrity

  • include required fields
  • validate picklist values before creation
  • verify parent IDs and relationship integrity
  • account for validation rules and duplicate constraints
  • exclude non-createable fields from input payloads

Cleanup discipline

Prefer one of:

  • delete-by-ID
  • delete-by-pattern
  • delete-by-created-date window
  • rollback / savepoint patterns for script-based test runs

Common Failure Patterns

Error Likely cause Default fix direction
INVALID_FIELD wrong field API name or FLS issue verify schema and access
REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING mandatory field omitted include required values from describe data
INVALID_CROSS_REFERENCE_KEY bad parent ID create / verify parent first
FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION validation rule blocked the record use valid test data or adjust setup
invalid picklist value guessed value instead of describe-backed value inspect picklist values first
non-writeable field error field is not createable / updateable remove it from the payload
bulk limits / timeouts wrong tool for the volume switch to bulk / staged import

Output Format

When finishing, report in this order:

  1. Operation performed
  2. Objects and counts
  3. Target org or local artifact path
  4. Record IDs / output files
  5. Verification result
  6. Cleanup instructions

Suggested shape:

Data operation: <create / update / delete / export / seed>
Objects: <object + counts>
Target: <org alias or local path>
Artifacts: <record ids / csv / apex / json files>
Verification: <passed / partial / failed>
Cleanup: <exact delete or rollback guidance>

Cross-Skill Integration

Need Delegate to Reason
discover object / field structure sf-metadata accurate schema grounding
run bulk-sensitive Apex validation sf-testing test execution and coverage
deploy missing schema first sf-deploy metadata readiness
implement production logic consuming the data sf-apex or sf-flow behavior implementation

Reference Map

Start here

Query / bulk / cleanup

Examples / limits


Score Guide

Score Meaning
117+ strong production-safe data workflow
104–116 good operation with minor improvements possible
91–103 acceptable but review advised
78–90 partial / risky patterns present
< 78 blocked until corrected
how to use sf-data

How to use sf-data on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sf-data
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-data

The skills CLI fetches sf-data from GitHub repository jaganpro/sf-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sf-data

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sf-data. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sf-data) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.739 reviews
  • Oshnikdeep· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend sf-data for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Piyush G· Dec 16, 2024

    sf-data has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ira Ndlovu· Dec 16, 2024

    sf-data reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Chen Ghosh· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for sf-data matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Mateo Perez· Dec 8, 2024

    sf-data fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aisha Dixit· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: sf-data is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ira Abebe· Nov 27, 2024

    We added sf-data from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Nov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in sf-data — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Aisha Sethi· Nov 7, 2024

    sf-data is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Isabella Chen· Nov 3, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sf-data is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 39

1 / 4