eve-plan-implementation

incept5/eve-skillpacks · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-plan-implementation
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Translate a plan document into Eve jobs, parallelize work, and drive review/verification

  • through job phases and dependencies.
skill.md

Eve Plan Implementation (Jobs)

Translate a plan document into Eve jobs, parallelize work, and drive review/verification through job phases and dependencies.

Orchestration model: The root epic is the orchestrator — it plans, delegates, and coordinates but does not execute heavy work itself. Phase jobs are sub-orchestrators that break a phase into tasks. Task jobs are workers — each one receives a self-contained description and executes independently with no access to the parent's context.

When to Use

  • A plan/spec exists and the work should be orchestrated as Eve jobs.
  • The initial job says "use eve-plan-implementation to implement the plan."

Workflow

1) Load context (orchestrator)

  • Read the plan doc and extract phases, deliverables, and blockers.
  • If present, read AGENTS.md for repo-specific rules.
  • Fetch current job context:
    eve job current --json
    
  • Stay lightweight: the orchestrator reads just enough to plan the breakdown. Delegate deep analysis (reading large files, exploring code) to worker jobs.

2) Create or confirm the root epic (orchestrator)

If the root job does not exist, create one:

eve job create \
  --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --description "Implement <plan name>" \
  --review human \
  --phase backlog

If a root job already exists, use it as the orchestrator. The root epic never executes implementation work — it creates phase jobs, wires up dependencies, and waits.

3) Break down into phase jobs (sub-orchestrators)

Create one child job per plan phase. Each phase job acts as a sub-orchestrator: it breaks its scope into task jobs and coordinates them.

eve job create \
  --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --parent $EVE_JOB_ID \
  --description "Phase: <name>. Deliverable: <artifact/result>" \
  --phase ready

Add dependencies so the parent waits on each phase:

eve job dep add $EVE_JOB_ID $PHASE_JOB_ID --type waits_for

4) Create task jobs under each phase (workers)

Split each phase into 2-6 atomic tasks with clear deliverables.

If a phase has only one task, execute it directly in the phase job rather than creating a child — avoid unnecessary orchestration overhead.

For multi-task phases, create child worker jobs. Each worker description must be self-contained: the executing agent has no access to the parent's context, the plan document, or prior conversation. Include in the description:

  • The objective and deliverable
  • Relevant file paths and module names
  • Any constraints, conventions, or context the worker needs to succeed
eve job create \
  --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --parent $PHASE_JOB_ID \
  --description "Task: <objective>. Deliverable: <result>. Files: <paths>. Context: <anything the worker needs>" \
  --phase ready

Make the phase wait on its tasks:

eve job dep add $PHASE_JOB_ID $TASK_JOB_ID --type waits_for

5) Parallelize by default

  • Independent tasks should have no dependencies and run in parallel.
  • Use blocks only for true sequencing requirements.

6) Execute tasks and update phases

Workers pick up task jobs and execute them independently. Each worker:

  1. Reads its own job description for scope and context.
  2. Does the work (reads files, writes code, runs tests).
  3. Reports completion.
eve job update $TASK_JOB_ID --phase active
# do the work
eve job submit $TASK_JOB_ID --summary "Completed <deliverable>"

If no review is required:

eve job close $TASK_JOB_ID --reason "Done"

7) Verification and review

  • Add a dedicated verification job (tests, manual checks) gated after implementation tasks.
  • Submit the phase job when all tasks are complete.
  • When all phases complete, submit the root epic for review.

8) Orchestrator waiting signal

After an orchestrator (root or phase) creates its child jobs and wires dependencies, it should return a waiting signal. This frees the orchestrator's resources while children execute in parallel:

{
  "eve": {
    "status": "waiting",
    "summary": "Spawned child jobs and added waits_for relations"
  }
}

Context Management

Orchestrators should stay lightweight:

  • Read just enough to plan the decomposition — don't analyze entire codebases.
  • Push context into child descriptions — file paths, conventions, constraints.
  • Delegate reading and analysis to workers. A worker that needs to understand a module should read it itself.
  • Avoid duplicating work — if two tasks need the same context, mention the shared source in both descriptions rather than summarizing it for them.

Minimal Mapping from Beads to Eve Jobs

  • Epic -> root job (issue_type via --type if available).
  • Phase -> child job under the epic.
  • Task -> child job under the phase.
  • bd dep add -> eve job dep add <parent> <child> --type waits_for
  • bd ready/blocked -> eve job dep list <id> + eve job list --phase ...

Optional: Git controls template

If tasks require code changes on a shared branch:

eve job create \
  --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --description "Task: <objective>" \
  --git-ref main \
  --git-ref-policy explicit \
  --git-branch feature/<name> \
  --git-create-branch if_missing \
  --git-commit required \
  --git-push on_success

Keep git controls consistent across tasks so all changes land in one PR.

how to use eve-plan-implementation

How to use eve-plan-implementation on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add eve-plan-implementation
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-plan-implementation

The skills CLI fetches eve-plan-implementation from GitHub repository incept5/eve-skillpacks and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/eve-plan-implementation

Reload or restart Cursor to activate eve-plan-implementation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /eve-plan-implementation) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.828 reviews
  • Aisha Srinivasan· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in eve-plan-implementation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Arjun Bhatia· Dec 12, 2024

    We added eve-plan-implementation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Zaid Lopez· Nov 15, 2024

    eve-plan-implementation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Anika Torres· Nov 3, 2024

    eve-plan-implementation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Isabella Zhang· Oct 22, 2024

    Registry listing for eve-plan-implementation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Zaid Kapoor· Oct 6, 2024

    Keeps context tight: eve-plan-implementation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Neel Reddy· Sep 13, 2024

    Useful defaults in eve-plan-implementation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Neel Mehta· Sep 9, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: eve-plan-implementation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 5, 2024

    We added eve-plan-implementation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chen Iyer· Aug 28, 2024

    eve-plan-implementation has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 28

1 / 3