ultracite▌
haydenbleasel/ultracite · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Zero-config linting and formatting for JavaScript/TypeScript with pluggable linter backends.
- ›Supports three linter backends: Biome (recommended), ESLint + Prettier, and Oxlint + Oxfmt; auto-detects active linter from config files
- ›CLI commands for checking issues, auto-fixing, diagnosing setup problems, and initializing new projects with interactive or non-interactive modes
- ›Framework-specific presets available for React, Next, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Astro, NestJS, and others; extends v
Ultracite
Zero-config linting and formatting for JS/TS projects. Supports three linter backends: Biome (recommended), ESLint + Prettier, and Oxlint + Oxfmt.
Detecting Ultracite
Check if ultracite is in package.json devDependencies. Detect the active linter by looking for:
biome.jsonc→ Biomeeslint.config.mjs→ ESLint.oxlintrc.json→ Oxlint
CLI Commands
# Check for issues (read-only)
bunx ultracite check
# Auto-fix issues
bunx ultracite fix
# Diagnose setup problems
bunx ultracite doctor
# Initialize in a new project
bunx ultracite init
Replace bunx with npx, pnpx, or yarn dlx depending on the package manager.
check and fix accept optional file paths: bunx ultracite check src/index.ts.
Initialization
bunx ultracite init runs an interactive setup. For non-interactive (CI) use, pass flags:
bunx ultracite init \
--pm bun \
--linter biome \
--editors vscode cursor \
--agents claude copilot \
--frameworks react next \
--integrations husky lint-staged \
--quiet
Flags:
--pm—npm|yarn|pnpm|bun--linter—biome(recommended) |eslint|oxlint--editors—vscode|zed|cursor|windsurf|antigravity|kiro|trae|void--agents—claude|codex|copilot|cline|amp|gemini|cursor-cli+ 19 more--frameworks—react|next|solid|vue|svelte|qwik|remix|angular|astro|nestjs--integrations—husky|lefthook|lint-staged|pre-commit--hooks— Enable auto-fix hooks for supported agents/editors--type-aware— Enable type-aware linting (oxlint only)--skip-install— Skip dependency installation--quiet— Suppress prompts (auto-detected whenCI=true)
Init creates config that extends Ultracite presets:
// biome.jsonc
{ "extends": ["ultracite/biome/core", "ultracite/biome/react"] }
Framework presets available per linter: core, react, next, solid, vue, svelte, qwik, remix, angular, astro, nestjs.
Code Standards
When writing code in a project with Ultracite, follow these standards. For the full rules reference, see references/code-standards.md.
Key rules at a glance:
Formatting is handled by the project's configured linter/formatter. Respect the repository's existing formatter settings instead of forcing one fixed line width, quote style, or trailing comma policy.
Type safety: Use explicit types when they improve clarity. Prefer unknown over any. Use as const for immutable values and rely on type narrowing over blunt assertions.
Modern JavaScript/TypeScript: Prefer const, destructuring, optional chaining, nullish coalescing, template literals, for...of, and concise arrow functions.
Async and correctness: Always await promises in async functions. Prefer async/await over promise chains. Remove console.log, debugger, and alert from production code.
React and accessibility: Use function components, keep hooks top-level with correct deps, avoid nested component definitions, and use semantic HTML with the right labels, headings, alt text, and keyboard affordances.
Organization, security, performance, and testing: Keep functions focused, prefer early returns, avoid dangerouslySetInnerHTML and eval(), prefer specific imports and top-level regex, and keep tests free of .only and .skip.
Troubleshooting
Run bunx ultracite doctor to diagnose. It checks:
- Linter installation (biome/eslint/oxlint binary available)
- Config validity (extends ultracite presets correctly)
- Ultracite in package.json dependencies
- Conflicting tools (old
.eslintrc.*,.prettierrc.*files)
Common fixes:
- Conflicting configs: Delete legacy
.eslintrc.*and.prettierrc.*files after migrating to Ultracite - Missing dependency: Run
bunx ultracite initagain or manually addultraciteto devDependencies - Rules not applying: Ensure config file extends the correct presets for your framework
How to use ultracite on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ultracite
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches ultracite from GitHub repository haydenbleasel/ultracite and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate ultracite. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ultracite) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★33 reviews- ★★★★★Hassan Wang· Dec 24, 2024
ultracite is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Noah Thompson· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in ultracite — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ava Haddad· Nov 15, 2024
ultracite reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Valentina Rahman· Nov 3, 2024
ultracite has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Meera Jackson· Oct 22, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ultracite is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Hassan Agarwal· Oct 6, 2024
Registry listing for ultracite matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aisha Ndlovu· Sep 25, 2024
Useful defaults in ultracite — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mei Wang· Sep 21, 2024
ultracite fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Hassan Farah· Sep 13, 2024
We added ultracite from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 5, 2024
ultracite is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 33