csharp-docs

github/awesome-copilot · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill csharp-docs
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

XML documentation standards and patterns for C# public APIs and members.

  • Use <summary> for one-sentence descriptions starting with a present-tense verb, and <remarks> for implementation details, usage notes, or additional context
  • Employ specific tags for different member types: <param> and <returns> for methods, <value> for properties, <typeparam> for generics, and <exception cref> for thrown exceptions
  • Follow prescribed wording patterns for Boolean
skill.md

C# Documentation Best Practices

  • Public members should be documented with XML comments.
  • It is encouraged to document internal members as well, especially if they are complex or not self-explanatory.

Guidance for all APIs

  • Use <summary> to provide a brief, one sentence, description of what the type or member does. Start the summary with a present-tense, third-person verb.
  • Use <remarks> for additional information, which can include implementation details, usage notes, or any other relevant context.
  • Use <see langword> for language-specific keywords like null, true, false, int, bool, etc.
  • Use <c> for inline code snippets.
  • Use <example> for usage examples on how to use the member.
    • Use <code> for code blocks. <code> tags should be placed within an <example> tag. Add the language of the code example using the language attribute, for example, <code language="csharp">.
  • Use <see cref> to reference other types or members inline (in a sentence).
  • Use <seealso> for standalone (not in a sentence) references to other types or members in the "See also" section of the online docs.
  • Use <inheritdoc/> to inherit documentation from base classes or interfaces.
    • Unless there is major behavior change, in which case you should document the differences.

Methods

  • Use <param> to describe method parameters.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the parameter is a flag enum, start the description with "A bitwise combination of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a non-flag enum, start the description with "One of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> to ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".
    • If the parameter is an "out" parameter, the wording should be of the form "When this method returns, contains .... This parameter is treated as uninitialized.".
  • Use <paramref> to reference parameter names in documentation.
  • Use <typeparam> to describe type parameters in generic types or methods.
  • Use <typeparamref> to reference type parameters in documentation.
  • Use <returns> to describe what the method returns.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the return type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".

Constructors

  • The summary wording should be "Initializes a new instance of the class [or struct].".

Properties

  • The <summary> should start with:
    • "Gets or sets..." for a read-write property.
    • "Gets..." for a read-only property.
    • "Gets [or sets] a value that indicates whether..." for properties that return a Boolean value.
  • Use <value> to describe the value of the property.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • If the property has a default value, add it in a separate sentence, for example, "The default is <see langword="false" />".
    • If the value type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />. The default is ...".

Exceptions

  • Use <exception cref> to document exceptions thrown by constructors, properties, indexers, methods, operators, and events.
  • Document all exceptions thrown directly by the member.
  • For exceptions thrown by nested members, document only the exceptions users are most likely to encounter.
  • The description of the exception describes the condition under which it's thrown.
    • Omit "Thrown if ..." or "If ..." at the beginning of the sentence. Just state the condition directly, for example "An error occurred when accessing a Message Queuing API."
how to use csharp-docs

How to use csharp-docs on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add csharp-docs
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill csharp-docs

The skills CLI fetches csharp-docs from GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/csharp-docs

Reload or restart Cursor to activate csharp-docs. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /csharp-docs) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.866 reviews
  • Pratham Ware· Dec 28, 2024

    csharp-docs reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Min Bansal· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend csharp-docs for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Jin Rahman· Dec 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: csharp-docs is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Chinedu Kapoor· Dec 20, 2024

    csharp-docs reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Amelia Menon· Dec 16, 2024

    We added csharp-docs from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Alexander Liu· Dec 12, 2024

    csharp-docs is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Emma Sharma· Dec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for csharp-docs matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Alexander Martin· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in csharp-docs — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024

    I recommend csharp-docs for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Charlotte Robinson· Nov 15, 2024

    csharp-docs reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 66

1 / 7