fastapi-code-review

existential-birds/beagle · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill fastapi-code-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

These are idiomatic FastAPI patterns that may appear problematic but are correct:

skill.md

FastAPI Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue Type Reference
APIRouter setup, response_model, status codes references/routes.md
Depends(), yield deps, cleanup, shared deps references/dependencies.md
Pydantic models, HTTPException, 422 handling references/validation.md
Async handlers, blocking I/O, background tasks references/async.md

Review Checklist

  • APIRouter with proper prefix and tags
  • All routes specify response_model for type safety
  • Correct HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)
  • Proper status codes (200, 201, 204, 404, etc.)
  • Dependencies use Depends() not manual calls
  • Yield dependencies have proper cleanup
  • Request/Response models use Pydantic
  • HTTPException with status code and detail
  • All route handlers are async def
  • No blocking I/O (requests, time.sleep, open())
  • Background tasks for non-blocking operations
  • No bare except in route handlers

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are idiomatic FastAPI patterns that may appear problematic but are correct:

  • Pydantic validates request body automatically - No manual validation needed when using typed Pydantic models as parameters
  • Dependency injection for database sessions - Sessions come from Depends(), not passed as function arguments
  • HTTPException for all HTTP errors - FastAPI handles conversion to proper HTTP responses
  • Async def endpoint without await - May be using sync dependencies or simple operations; FastAPI handles this
  • Type annotation on Depends() - This is documentation/IDE support, not a type assertion
  • Query/Path/Body defaults - FastAPI processes these at runtime, not traditional Python defaults
  • Returning dict from endpoint - Pydantic converts automatically if response_model is set

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag issues when the context warrants it:

  • Flag missing validation ONLY IF the field isn't already in a Pydantic model with validators
  • Flag missing auth ONLY IF the endpoint isn't using Depends() with an auth dependency
  • Flag missing error handling ONLY IF HTTPException isn't raised appropriately for error cases
  • Flag sync in async ONLY IF the operation is actually blocking (file I/O, network calls, CPU-bound), not just non-async

FastAPI Framework Behaviors

FastAPI + Pydantic handle many concerns automatically:

  • Request validation via Pydantic models
  • Response serialization via response_model
  • Dependency injection for cross-cutting concerns
  • Exception handling via exception handlers

Before flagging "missing" functionality, verify FastAPI isn't handling it.

When to Load References

  • Reviewing route definitions → routes.md
  • Reviewing dependency injection → dependencies.md
  • Reviewing Pydantic models/validation → validation.md
  • Reviewing async route handlers → async.md

Review Questions

  1. Do all routes have explicit response models and status codes?
  2. Are dependencies injected via Depends() with proper cleanup?
  3. Do all Pydantic models validate inputs correctly?
  4. Are all route handlers async and non-blocking?

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.549 reviews
  • Hana Mensah· Dec 28, 2024

    fastapi-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Diya Mehta· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for fastapi-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Harper Liu· Dec 20, 2024

    We added fastapi-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Meera Perez· Dec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in fastapi-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Meera Dixit· Dec 4, 2024

    fastapi-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024

    fastapi-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Diya Menon· Nov 19, 2024

    fastapi-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024

    We added fastapi-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Sophia Jain· Nov 15, 2024

    Keeps context tight: fastapi-code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ishan Gonzalez· Nov 7, 2024

    fastapi-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 49

1 / 5