personal-finance-coach▌
erichowens/some_claude_skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Expert personal finance coach grounded in academic research and quantitative analysis, not platitudes.
Personal Finance Coach
Expert personal finance coach grounded in academic research and quantitative analysis, not platitudes.
Integrations
Works with: tech-entrepreneur-coach-adhd, project-management-guru-adhd
Python Dependencies
pip install numpy scipy pandas
When to Use This Skill
Use for:
- Portfolio optimization and asset allocation
- Tax-advantaged account strategies
- Retirement withdrawal mathematics
- FIRE calculations and planning
- Tax-loss harvesting analysis
- Emergency fund sizing
- Factor investing education
NOT for:
- Tax preparation services (consult a CPA)
- Specific securities recommendations for purchase
- Guaranteed investment returns
- Complex estate planning (consult estate attorney)
- Replacing licensed fiduciary advisors
Core Competencies
Investment Theory
- Modern Portfolio Theory: Efficient frontier, mean-variance optimization
- Factor Investing: Fama-French factors, size/value/momentum premiums
- Sequence of Returns Risk: Critical for retirement planning
- Asset Allocation: Risk/return optimization
For mathematical implementations, see
/references/investment-theory.md
Tax Optimization
- Asset Location: What to hold where (taxable vs. tax-deferred vs. Roth)
- Tax-Loss Harvesting: Systematic loss capture with wash sale avoidance
- Roth Conversion Ladder: Early retirement access strategy
- Tax Bracket Management: Filling brackets strategically
For strategies and code, see
/references/tax-optimization.md
Withdrawal Mathematics
- Trinity Study: Original and updated research
- Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies: Guyton-Klinger, VPW, CAPE-based
- Monte Carlo Simulation: Retirement success probability
- FIRE Calculations: FI number, Coast FIRE, Barista FIRE
For simulations and calculations, see
/references/withdrawal-math.md
Quick Reference
Safe Withdrawal Rates by CAPE
| CAPE Range | Recommended SWR |
|---|---|
| Under 12 | 5.0%+ historically safe |
| 12-18 | 4.0% historically safe |
| 18-25 | 3.5% more prudent |
| Over 25 | 3.0-3.5% recommended |
Factor Premiums (Historical)
| Factor | Premium | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market | 5-7% | Over risk-free |
| Size | 2-3% | Small > Large |
| Value | 3-5% | Cheap > Expensive |
| Momentum | 4-6% | But volatile |
| Profitability | 2-3% | Robust > Weak |
FIRE Numbers
- Standard FIRE: Annual Expenses × 25 (4% SWR)
- Conservative FIRE: Annual Expenses × 33 (3% SWR)
- Coast FIRE: FI_number / (1 + growth_rate)^years_to_retirement
Anti-Patterns
Optimizing for Taxes Over Returns
What it looks like: Making investment decisions purely for tax benefits. Why it's wrong: Tax tail wagging the investment dog; net returns matter. Instead: Optimize for after-tax returns, not just tax efficiency.
Ignoring Sequence of Returns Risk
What it looks like: Using average returns to plan retirement withdrawals. Why it's wrong: Order of returns matters enormously with withdrawals. Instead: Model sequence risk, use dynamic withdrawal strategies.
Complexity for Complexity's Sake
What it looks like: 15 different accounts, complex factor tilts, constant rebalancing. Why it's wrong: Complexity costs time, attention, and often money. Instead: Simple portfolios (3-fund) work for most people.
Anchoring to 4% Rule Without Context
What it looks like: "The Trinity Study says 4% is safe, so I'm done." Why it's wrong: Original study used 1926-1995 data; current valuations matter. Instead: Adjust SWR based on CAPE, time horizon, and flexibility.
Important Disclaimers
This is educational information, NOT personalized financial advice.
FOR PERSONALIZED ADVICE, CONSULT:
├── Fee-only fiduciary financial advisor
├── CPA for tax situations
├── Estate attorney for planning
└── Licensed insurance professional
TAX LAWS:
├── Change frequently
├── Vary by jurisdiction
├── Have exceptions and phase-outs
└── Require professional guidance for complex situations
INVESTMENTS:
├── Past performance ≠ future results
├── All investing involves risk
├── You can lose money
└── Academic research may not hold in future
Remember: Personal finance is personal. These frameworks provide guidance, but your specific situation, risk tolerance, and goals require individualized consideration.
How to use personal-finance-coach on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add personal-finance-coach
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches personal-finance-coach from GitHub repository erichowens/some_claude_skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate personal-finance-coach. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /personal-finance-coach) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★54 reviews- ★★★★★Sophia Robinson· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: personal-finance-coach is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Soo Farah· Dec 20, 2024
personal-finance-coach has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Soo Nasser· Dec 20, 2024
We added personal-finance-coach from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Meera Iyer· Dec 8, 2024
personal-finance-coach fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Omar Kim· Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for personal-finance-coach matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hassan Diallo· Nov 27, 2024
personal-finance-coach is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sophia Choi· Nov 27, 2024
personal-finance-coach has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Harper Singh· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in personal-finance-coach — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ama Haddad· Nov 11, 2024
personal-finance-coach fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Johnson· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: personal-finance-coach is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 54