better-result-adopt

dmmulroy/better-result · updated May 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/dmmulroy/better-result --skill better-result-adopt
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Adopt better-result incrementally in existing codebases without rewriting everything at once.

skill.md

better-result Adopt

Adopt better-result incrementally in existing codebases without rewriting everything at once.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to:

  • migrate from try/catch to Result.try or Result.tryPromise
  • replace nullable return values with typed Result<T, E>
  • define domain-specific TaggedError types
  • refactor nested error handling into andThen chains or Result.gen
  • standardize error handling across a service or module

Reading Order

Task Files to Read
Adopt better-result in a module This file
Define or review error types references/tagged-errors.md
Inspect library implementation details opensrc/ if present

Prerequisites

Before editing code:

  1. Confirm better-result is already installed in the target project.
  2. Check for an opensrc/ directory. If present, read the package source there for current patterns.
  3. Identify the migration scope first: one file, one module, or one boundary layer.

Migration Strategy

1. Start at boundaries

Begin with I/O boundaries and exception-heavy code:

  • HTTP clients
  • database access
  • file system operations
  • parsing and validation
  • framework adapters

Do not convert the whole codebase at once.

2. Classify existing failures

Category Examples Target shape
Domain errors not found, validation, auth TaggedError + Result.err
Infrastructure errors network, DB, file I/O Result.tryPromise + mapped error
Programmer defects bad assumptions, null deref leave throwing; defects become Panic inside Result callbacks

3. Migrate in this order

  1. Define error types.
  2. Wrap throwing boundaries with Result.try / Result.tryPromise.
  3. Replace null or boolean sentinel returns with Result.
  4. Refactor call sites to propagate Result values.
  5. Collapse nested branching into andThen, mapError, or Result.gen.

Core Transformations

Try/catch → Result.try

function parseConfig(json: string): Result<Config, ParseError> {
  return Result.try({
    try: () => JSON.parse(json) as Config,
    catch: (cause) => new ParseError({ cause, message: `Parse failed: ${cause}` }),
  });
}

Async throws → Result.tryPromise

async function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<Result<User, ApiError | UnhandledException>> {
  return Result.tryPromise({
    try: async () => {
      const res = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`);
      if (!res.ok) throw new ApiError({ status: res.status, message: `API ${res.status}` });
      return res.json() as Promise<User>;
    },
    catch: (cause) => (cause instanceof ApiError ? cause : new UnhandledException({ cause })),
  });
}

Null sentinel → Result

function findUser(id: string): Result<User, NotFoundError> {
  const user = users.find((candidate) => candidate.id === id);
  return user
    ? Result.ok(user)
    : Result.err(new NotFoundError({ id, message: `User ${id} not found` }));
}

Nested flow → Result.gen

async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Result<OrderResult, OrderError>> {
  return Result.gen(async function* () {
    const order = yield* Result.await(fetchOrder(orderId));
    const validated = yield* validateOrder(order);
    const result = yield* Result.await(submitOrder(validated));
    return Result.ok(result);
  });
}

Execution Workflow

  1. Audit the target module for try, catch, .catch(...), throw, null, undefined, and status-flag error handling.
  2. Define or update TaggedError classes before changing control flow.
  3. Convert boundary functions first and change their signatures to Result<T, E> or Promise<Result<T, E>>.
  4. Update immediate callers so they handle or propagate the new Result.
  5. Where multiple Result-returning steps compose, use Result.gen or andThen.
  6. Preserve error context by keeping cause, IDs, messages, and other structured fields.
  7. Run tests and add coverage for both success and error paths.

Completion Criteria

A migration is complete when:

  • target functions no longer rely on try/catch for expected domain failures
  • nullable or sentinel error returns are replaced with explicit Result values
  • domain failures use typed TaggedError classes
  • callers either propagate Result or explicitly unwrap/match it
  • tests cover at least one success path and one representative error path

Common Pitfalls

  • Over-wrapping everything instead of starting at boundaries
  • Losing original failure context when mapping errors
  • Mixing throw-based and Result-based APIs deep in the same flow
  • Catching Panic instead of fixing the underlying defect

In This Reference

File Purpose
references/tagged-errors.md TaggedError patterns, matching, type guards, and examples

If opensrc/ exists, treat it as the source of truth for implementation details and current API behavior.

how to use better-result-adopt

How to use better-result-adopt on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add better-result-adopt
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/dmmulroy/better-result --skill better-result-adopt

The skills CLI fetches better-result-adopt from GitHub repository dmmulroy/better-result and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/better-result-adopt

Reload or restart Cursor to activate better-result-adopt. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /better-result-adopt) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.725 reviews
  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: better-result-adopt is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Mateo Bansal· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: better-result-adopt is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Michael Smith· Dec 12, 2024

    I recommend better-result-adopt for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in better-result-adopt — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024

    Registry listing for better-result-adopt matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 10, 2024

    better-result-adopt reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sakura Sharma· Sep 17, 2024

    Keeps context tight: better-result-adopt is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 1, 2024

    better-result-adopt has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ren Wang· Sep 1, 2024

    better-result-adopt has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Pratham Ware· Aug 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: better-result-adopt is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 25

1 / 3