git-commit-helper

davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill git-commit-helper
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Analyze staged changes and generate commit message:

skill.md

Git Commit Helper

Quick start

Analyze staged changes and generate commit message:

# View staged changes
git diff --staged

# Generate commit message based on changes
# (Claude will analyze the diff and suggest a message)

Commit message format

Follow conventional commits format:

<type>(<scope>): <description>

[optional body]

[optional footer]

Types

  • feat: New feature
  • fix: Bug fix
  • docs: Documentation changes
  • style: Code style changes (formatting, missing semicolons)
  • refactor: Code refactoring
  • test: Adding or updating tests
  • chore: Maintenance tasks

Examples

Feature commit:

feat(auth): add JWT authentication

Implement JWT-based authentication system with:
- Login endpoint with token generation
- Token validation middleware
- Refresh token support

Bug fix:

fix(api): handle null values in user profile

Prevent crashes when user profile fields are null.
Add null checks before accessing nested properties.

Refactor:

refactor(database): simplify query builder

Extract common query patterns into reusable functions.
Reduce code duplication in database layer.

Analyzing changes

Review what's being committed:

# Show files changed
git status

# Show detailed changes
git diff --staged

# Show statistics
git diff --staged --stat

# Show changes for specific file
git diff --staged path/to/file

Commit message guidelines

DO:

  • Use imperative mood ("add feature" not "added feature")
  • Keep first line under 50 characters
  • Capitalize first letter
  • No period at end of summary
  • Explain WHY not just WHAT in body

DON'T:

  • Use vague messages like "update" or "fix stuff"
  • Include technical implementation details in summary
  • Write paragraphs in summary line
  • Use past tense

Multi-file commits

When committing multiple related changes:

refactor(core): restructure authentication module

- Move auth logic from controllers to service layer
- Extract validation into separate validators
- Update tests to use new structure
- Add integration tests for auth flow

Breaking change: Auth service now requires config object

Scope examples

Frontend:

  • feat(ui): add loading spinner to dashboard
  • fix(form): validate email format

Backend:

  • feat(api): add user profile endpoint
  • fix(db): resolve connection pool leak

Infrastructure:

  • chore(ci): update Node version to 20
  • feat(docker): add multi-stage build

Breaking changes

Indicate breaking changes clearly:

feat(api)!: restructure API response format

BREAKING CHANGE: All API responses now follow JSON:API spec

Previous format:
{ "data": {...}, "status": "ok" }

New format:
{ "data": {...}, "meta": {...} }

Migration guide: Update client code to handle new response structure

Template workflow

  1. Review changes: git diff --staged
  2. Identify type: Is it feat, fix, refactor, etc.?
  3. Determine scope: What part of the codebase?
  4. Write summary: Brief, imperative description
  5. Add body: Explain why and what impact
  6. Note breaking changes: If applicable

Interactive commit helper

Use git add -p for selective staging:

# Stage changes interactively
git add -p

# Review what's staged
git diff --staged

# Commit with message
git commit -m "type(scope): description"

Amending commits

Fix the last commit message:

# Amend commit message only
git commit --amend

# Amend and add more changes
git add forgotten-file.js
git commit --amend --no-edit

Best practices

  1. Atomic commits - One logical change per commit
  2. Test before commit - Ensure code works
  3. Reference issues - Include issue numbers if applicable
  4. Keep it focused - Don't mix unrelated changes
  5. Write for humans - Future you will read this

Commit message checklist

  • Type is appropriate (feat/fix/docs/etc.)
  • Scope is specific and clear
  • Summary is under 50 characters
  • Summary uses imperative mood
  • Body explains WHY not just WHAT
  • Breaking changes are clearly marked
  • Related issue numbers are included
how to use git-commit-helper

How to use git-commit-helper on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add git-commit-helper
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill git-commit-helper

The skills CLI fetches git-commit-helper from GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/git-commit-helper

Reload or restart Cursor to activate git-commit-helper. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /git-commit-helper) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.725 reviews
  • Arya Lopez· Dec 8, 2024

    git-commit-helper has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Maya Reddy· Nov 27, 2024

    git-commit-helper fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 23, 2024

    I recommend git-commit-helper for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ren Harris· Nov 3, 2024

    Useful defaults in git-commit-helper — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Evelyn Bhatia· Oct 26, 2024

    git-commit-helper fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dev Chawla· Oct 22, 2024

    I recommend git-commit-helper for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yusuf Flores· Oct 18, 2024

    We added git-commit-helper from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Pratham Ware· Oct 14, 2024

    Useful defaults in git-commit-helper — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Maya Bhatia· Sep 9, 2024

    Keeps context tight: git-commit-helper is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 1, 2024

    git-commit-helper is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 25

1 / 3