gh-fix-ci▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.
Gh Pr Checks Plan Fix
Overview
Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.
- Depends on the
planskill for drafting and approving the fix plan.
Prereq: ensure gh is authenticated (for example, run gh auth login once), then run gh auth status with escalated permissions (include workflow/repo scopes) so gh commands succeed. If sandboxing blocks gh auth status, rerun it with sandbox_permissions=require_escalated.
Inputs
repo: path inside the repo (default.)pr: PR number or URL (optional; defaults to current branch PR)ghauthentication for the repo host
Quick start
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"- Add
--jsonif you want machine-friendly output for summarization.
Workflow
- Verify gh authentication.
- Run
gh auth statusin the repo with escalated scopes (workflow/repo) after runninggh auth login. - If sandboxed auth status fails, rerun the command with
sandbox_permissions=require_escalatedto allow network/keyring access. - If unauthenticated, ask the user to log in before proceeding.
- Run
- Resolve the PR.
- Prefer the current branch PR:
gh pr view --json number,url. - If the user provides a PR number or URL, use that directly.
- Prefer the current branch PR:
- Inspect failing checks (GitHub Actions only).
- Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"- Add
--jsonfor machine-friendly output.
- Manual fallback:
gh pr checks <pr> --json name,state,bucket,link,startedAt,completedAt,workflow- If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by
gh.
- If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by
- For each failing check, extract the run id from
detailsUrland run:gh run view <run_id> --json name,workflowName,conclusion,status,url,event,headBranch,headShagh run view <run_id> --log
- If the run log says it is still in progress, fetch job logs directly:
gh api "/repos/<owner>/<repo>/actions/jobs/<job_id>/logs" > "<path>"
- Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
- Scope non-GitHub Actions checks.
- If
detailsUrlis not a GitHub Actions run, label it as external and only report the URL. - Do not attempt Buildkite or other providers; keep the workflow lean.
- If
- Summarize failures for the user.
- Provide the failing check name, run URL (if any), and a concise log snippet.
- Call out missing logs explicitly.
- Create a plan.
- Use the
planskill to draft a concise plan and request approval.
- Use the
- Implement after approval.
- Apply the approved plan, summarize diffs/tests, and ask about opening a PR.
- Recheck status.
- After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and
gh pr checksto confirm.
- After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and
Bundled Resources
scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py
Fetch failing PR checks, pull GitHub Actions logs, and extract a failure snippet. Exits non-zero when failures remain so it can be used in automation.
Usage examples:
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "123"python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123" --jsonpython "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --max-lines 200 --context 40
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★25 reviews- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend gh-fix-ci for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Martinez· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in gh-fix-ci — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Daniel Ghosh· Dec 8, 2024
gh-fix-ci has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Amelia Khan· Nov 27, 2024
gh-fix-ci is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Aarav Farah· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: gh-fix-ci is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Nov 3, 2024
gh-fix-ci fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Oct 22, 2024
gh-fix-ci has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Amelia Huang· Oct 18, 2024
gh-fix-ci reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Neel Rahman· Oct 18, 2024
I recommend gh-fix-ci for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Amelia Torres· Sep 25, 2024
We added gh-fix-ci from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 25