gh-fix-ci

davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill gh-fix-ci
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.

skill.md

Gh Pr Checks Plan Fix

Overview

Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.

  • Depends on the plan skill for drafting and approving the fix plan.

Prereq: ensure gh is authenticated (for example, run gh auth login once), then run gh auth status with escalated permissions (include workflow/repo scopes) so gh commands succeed. If sandboxing blocks gh auth status, rerun it with sandbox_permissions=require_escalated.

Inputs

  • repo: path inside the repo (default .)
  • pr: PR number or URL (optional; defaults to current branch PR)
  • gh authentication for the repo host

Quick start

  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"
  • Add --json if you want machine-friendly output for summarization.

Workflow

  1. Verify gh authentication.
    • Run gh auth status in the repo with escalated scopes (workflow/repo) after running gh auth login.
    • If sandboxed auth status fails, rerun the command with sandbox_permissions=require_escalated to allow network/keyring access.
    • If unauthenticated, ask the user to log in before proceeding.
  2. Resolve the PR.
    • Prefer the current branch PR: gh pr view --json number,url.
    • If the user provides a PR number or URL, use that directly.
  3. Inspect failing checks (GitHub Actions only).
    • Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
      • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"
      • Add --json for machine-friendly output.
    • Manual fallback:
      • gh pr checks <pr> --json name,state,bucket,link,startedAt,completedAt,workflow
        • If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by gh.
      • For each failing check, extract the run id from detailsUrl and run:
        • gh run view <run_id> --json name,workflowName,conclusion,status,url,event,headBranch,headSha
        • gh run view <run_id> --log
      • If the run log says it is still in progress, fetch job logs directly:
        • gh api "/repos/<owner>/<repo>/actions/jobs/<job_id>/logs" > "<path>"
  4. Scope non-GitHub Actions checks.
    • If detailsUrl is not a GitHub Actions run, label it as external and only report the URL.
    • Do not attempt Buildkite or other providers; keep the workflow lean.
  5. Summarize failures for the user.
    • Provide the failing check name, run URL (if any), and a concise log snippet.
    • Call out missing logs explicitly.
  6. Create a plan.
    • Use the plan skill to draft a concise plan and request approval.
  7. Implement after approval.
    • Apply the approved plan, summarize diffs/tests, and ask about opening a PR.
  8. Recheck status.
    • After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and gh pr checks to confirm.

Bundled Resources

scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py

Fetch failing PR checks, pull GitHub Actions logs, and extract a failure snippet. Exits non-zero when failures remain so it can be used in automation.

Usage examples:

  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "123"
  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123" --json
  • python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --max-lines 200 --context 40

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.725 reviews
  • Yash Thakker· Dec 12, 2024

    I recommend gh-fix-ci for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Benjamin Martinez· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in gh-fix-ci — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Daniel Ghosh· Dec 8, 2024

    gh-fix-ci has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Amelia Khan· Nov 27, 2024

    gh-fix-ci is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Aarav Farah· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: gh-fix-ci is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Pratham Ware· Nov 3, 2024

    gh-fix-ci fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Oshnikdeep· Oct 22, 2024

    gh-fix-ci has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Amelia Huang· Oct 18, 2024

    gh-fix-ci reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Neel Rahman· Oct 18, 2024

    I recommend gh-fix-ci for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Amelia Torres· Sep 25, 2024

    We added gh-fix-ci from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 25

1 / 3