code-review▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
Sentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
Review Checklist
Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
- ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
Feedback Guidelines
Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
Common Patterns to Flag
Python/Django
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
TypeScript/React
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
Security
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])
References
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★71 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ava Menon· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Aarav Agarwal· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Sanchez· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Yuki Choi· Dec 12, 2024
Keeps context tight: code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Ramirez· Nov 23, 2024
code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Anaya Gonzalez· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Olivia Johnson· Nov 11, 2024
code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Anaya Perez· Nov 7, 2024
code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 71