c4-architecture▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.
C4 Architecture Documentation
Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.
Workflow
- Understand scope - Determine which C4 level(s) are needed based on audience
- Analyze codebase - Explore the system to identify components, containers, and relationships
- Generate diagrams - Create Mermaid C4 diagrams at appropriate abstraction levels
- Document - Write diagrams to markdown files with explanatory context
C4 Diagram Levels
Select the appropriate level based on the documentation need:
| Level | Diagram Type | Audience | Shows | When to Create |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C4Context | Everyone | System + external actors | Always (required) |
| 2 | C4Container | Technical | Apps, databases, services | Always (required) |
| 3 | C4Component | Developers | Internal components | Only if adds value |
| 4 | C4Deployment | DevOps | Infrastructure nodes | For production systems |
| - | C4Dynamic | Technical | Request flows (numbered) | For complex workflows |
Key Insight: "Context + Container diagrams are sufficient for most software development teams." Only create Component/Code diagrams when they genuinely add value.
Quick Start Examples
System Context (Level 1)
C4Context
title System Context - Workout Tracker
Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts and exercises")
System(app, "Workout Tracker", "Vue PWA for tracking strength and CrossFit workouts")
System_Ext(browser, "Web Browser", "Stores data in IndexedDB")
Rel(user, app, "Uses")
Rel(app, browser, "Persists data to", "IndexedDB")
Container Diagram (Level 2)
C4Container
title Container Diagram - Workout Tracker
Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts")
Container_Boundary(app, "Workout Tracker PWA") {
Container(spa, "SPA", "Vue 3, TypeScript", "Single-page application")
Container(pinia, "State Management", "Pinia", "Manages application state")
ContainerDb(indexeddb, "IndexedDB", "Dexie", "Local workout storage")
}
Rel(user, spa, "Uses")
Rel(spa, pinia, "Reads/writes state")
Rel(pinia, indexeddb, "Persists", "Dexie ORM")
Component Diagram (Level 3)
C4Component
title Component Diagram - Workout Feature
Container(views, "Views", "Vue Router pages")
Container_Boundary(workout, "Workout Feature") {
Component(useWorkout, "useWorkout", "Composable", "Workout execution state")
Component(useTimer, "useTimer", "Composable", "Timer state machine")
Component(workoutRepo, "WorkoutRepository", "Dexie", "Workout persistence")
}
Rel(views, useWorkout, "Uses")
Rel(useWorkout, useTimer, "Controls")
Rel(useWorkout, workoutRepo, "Saves to")
Dynamic Diagram (Request Flow)
C4Dynamic
title Dynamic Diagram - User Sign In Flow
ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "User credentials")
Container(spa, "Single-Page App", "React", "Banking UI")
Container_Boundary(api, "API Application") {
Component(signIn, "Sign In Controller", "Express", "Auth endpoint")
Component(security, "Security Service", "JWT", "Validates credentials")
}
Rel(spa, signIn, "1. Submit credentials", "JSON/HTTPS")
Rel(signIn, security, "2. Validate")
Rel(security, db, "3. Query user", "SQL")
UpdateRelStyle(spa, signIn, $textColor="blue", $offsetY="-30")
Deployment Diagram
C4Deployment
title Deployment Diagram - Production
Deployment_Node(browser, "Customer Browser", "Chrome/Firefox") {
Container(spa, "SPA", "React", "Web application")
}
Deployment_Node(aws, "AWS Cloud", "us-east-1") {
Deployment_Node(ecs, "ECS Cluster", "Fargate") {
Container(api, "API Service", "Node.js", "REST API")
}
Deployment_Node(rds, "RDS", "db.r5.large") {
ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "Application data")
}
}
Rel(spa, api, "API calls", "HTTPS")
Rel(api, db, "Reads/writes", "JDBC")
Element Syntax
People and Systems
Person(alias, "Label", "Description")
Person_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description") # External person
System(alias, "Label", "Description")
System_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description") # External system
SystemDb(alias, "Label", "Description") # Database system
SystemQueue(alias, "Label", "Description") # Queue system
Containers
Container(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Container_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerQueue(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Components
Component(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Component_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ComponentDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Boundaries
Enterprise_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
System_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Container_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Boundary(alias, "Label", "type") { ... }
Relationships
Rel(from, to, "Label")
Rel(from, to, "Label", "Technology")
BiRel(from, to, "Label") # Bidirectional
Rel_U(from, to, "Label") # Upward
Rel_D(from, to, "Label") # Downward
Rel_L(from, to, "Label") # Leftward
Rel_R(from, to, "Label") # Rightward
Deployment Nodes
Deployment_Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }
Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... } # Shorthand
Styling and Layout
Layout Configuration
UpdateLayoutConfig($c4ShapeInRow="3", $c4BoundaryInRow="1")
$c4ShapeInRow- Number of shapes per row (default: 4)$c4BoundaryInRow- Number of boundaries per row (default: 2)
Element Styling
UpdateElementStyle(alias, $fontColor="red", $bgColor="grey", $borderColor="red")
Relationship Styling
UpdateRelStyle(from, to, $textColor="blue", $lineColor="blue", $offsetX="5", $offsetY="-10")
Use $offsetX and $offsetY to fix overlapping relationship labels.
Best Practices
Essential Rules
- Every element must have: Name, Type, Technology (where applicable), and Description
- Use unidirectional arrows only - Bidirectional arrows create ambiguity
- Label arrows with action verbs - "Sends email using", "Reads from", not just "uses"
- Include technology labels - "JSON/HTTPS", "JDBC", "gRPC"
- Stay under 20 elements per diagram - Split complex systems into multiple diagrams
Clarity Guidelines
- Start at Level 1 - Context diagrams help frame the system scope
- One diagram per file - Keep diagrams focused on a single abstraction level
- Meaningful aliases - Use descriptive aliases (e.g.,
orderServicenots1) - Concise descriptions - Keep descriptions under 50 characters when possible
- Always include a title - "System Context diagram for [System Name]"
What to Avoid
See references/common-mistakes.md for detailed anti-patterns:
- Confusing containers (deployable) vs components (non-deployable)
- Modeling shared libraries as containers
- Showing message brokers as single containers instead of individual topics
- Adding undefined abstraction levels like "subcomponents"
- Removing type labels to "simplify" diagrams
Microservices Guidelines
Single Team Ownership
Model each microservice as a container (or container group):
C4Container
title Microservices - Single Team
System_Boundary(platform, "E-commerce Platform") {
Container(orderApi, "Order Service", "Spring Boot", "Order processing")
ContainerDb(orderDb, "Order DB", "PostgreSQL", "Order data")
Container(inventoryApi, "Inventory Service", "Node.js", "Stock management")
ContainerDb(inventoryDb, "Inventory DB", "MongoDB", "Stock data")
}
Multi-Team Ownership
Promote microservices to software systems when owned by separate teams:
C4Context
title Microservices - Multi-Team
Person(customer, "Customer", "Places orders")
System(orderSystem, "Order System", "Team Alpha")
System(inventorySystem, "Inventory System", "Team Beta")
System(paymentSystem, "Payment System", "Team Gamma")
Rel(customer, orderSystem, "Places orders")
Rel(orderSystem, inventorySystem, "Checks stock")
Rel(orderSystem, paymentSystem, "Processes payment")
Event-Driven Architecture
Show individual topics/queues as containers, NOT a single "Kafka" box:
C4Container
title Event-Driven Architecture
Container(orderService, "Order Service", "Java", "Creates orders")
Container(stockService, "Stock Service", "Java", "Manages inventory")
ContainerQueue(orderTopic, "order.created", "Kafka", "Order events")
ContainerQueue(stockTopic, "stock.reserved", "Kafka", "Stock events")
Rel(orderService, orderTopic, "Publishes to")
Rel(stockService, orderTopic, "Subscribes to")
Rel(stockService, stockTopic, "Publishes to")
Rel(orderService, stockTopic, "Subscribes to")
Output Location
Write architecture documentation to docs/architecture/ with naming convention:
c4-context.md- System context diagramc4-containers.md- Container diagramc4-components-{feature}.md- Component diagrams per featurec4-deployment.md- Deployment diagramc4-dynamic-{flow}.md- Dynamic diagrams for specific flows
Audience-Appropriate Detail
| Audience | Recommended Diagrams |
|---|---|
| Executives | System Context only |
| Product Managers | Context + Container |
| Architects | Context + Container + key Components |
| Developers | All levels as needed |
| DevOps | Container + Deployment |
References
- references/c4-syntax.md - Complete Mermaid C4 syntax
- references/common-mistakes.md - Anti-patterns to avoid
- references/advanced-patterns.md - Microservices, event-driven, deployment
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★28 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in c4-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024
c4-architecture fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Thompson· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend c4-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Camila Rao· Dec 4, 2024
We added c4-architecture from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kabir Flores· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: c4-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024
c4-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakura Agarwal· Oct 18, 2024
c4-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 6, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: c4-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Tariq Menon· Sep 21, 2024
c4-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Zara White· Aug 12, 2024
Keeps context tight: c4-architecture is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 28