go-testing

cxuu/golang-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Normative: Test failures must be diagnosable without reading the test

  • source.
skill.md

Go Testing

Quick Reference

Pattern Use When
t.Error Default — report failure, keep running
t.Fatal Setup failed or continuing is meaningless
cmp.Diff Comparing structs, slices, maps, protos
Table-driven Many cases share identical logic
Subtests Need filtering, parallel execution, or naming
t.Helper() Any test helper function (call as first statement)
t.Cleanup() Teardown in helpers instead of defer

Useful Test Failures

Normative: Test failures must be diagnosable without reading the test source.

Every failure message must include: function name, inputs, actual (got), and expected (want). Use the format YourFunc(%v) = %v, want %v.

// Good:
t.Errorf("Add(2, 3) = %d, want %d", got, 5)

// Bad: Missing function name and inputs
t.Errorf("got %d, want %d", got, 5)

Always print got before want: got %v, want %v — never reversed.


No Assertion Libraries

Normative: Do not use assertion libraries. Use cmp.Diff for complex comparisons.

if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
    t.Errorf("GetPost() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}

For protocol buffers, add protocmp.Transform() as a cmp option. Always include the direction key (-want +got) in diff messages. Avoid comparing JSON/serialized output — compare semantically instead.

Read references/TEST-HELPERS.md when writing custom comparison helpers or domain-specific test utilities.


t.Error vs t.Fatal

Normative: Use t.Error by default to report all failures in one run. Use t.Fatal only when continuing is impossible.

Choose t.Fatal when:

  • Setup fails (DB connection, file load)
  • The next assertion depends on the previous one succeeding (e.g., decode after encode)

Never call t.Fatal/t.FailNow from a goroutine other than the test goroutine — use t.Error instead.

Read references/TEST-HELPERS.md when writing helpers that need to choose between t.Error and t.Fatal, or for detailed examples of both.


Table-Driven Tests

See assets/table-test-template.go when scaffolding a new table-driven test and need the canonical struct, loop, and subtest layout.

Advisory: Use table-driven tests when many cases share identical logic.

Use table tests when: all cases run the same code path with no conditional setup, mocking, or assertions. A single shouldErr bool is acceptable.

Don't use table tests when: cases need complex setup, conditional mocking, or multiple branches — write separate test functions instead.

Key rules:

  • Use field names when cases span many lines or have same-type adjacent fields
  • Include inputs in failure messages — never identify rows by index

Read references/TABLE-DRIVEN-TESTS.md when writing table-driven tests, subtests, or parallel tests.

Validation: After generating or modifying tests, run go test -run TestXxx -v to verify the tests compile and pass. Fix any compilation errors before proceeding.


Test Helpers

Normative: Test helpers must call t.Helper() first and use t.Cleanup() for teardown.

func setupTestDB(t *testing.T) *sql.DB {
    t.Helper()
    db, err := sql.Open("sqlite3", ":memory:")
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("Could not open database: %v", err)
    }
    t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
    return db
}

Read references/TEST-HELPERS.md when writing test helpers, cleanup functions, or custom comparison utilities.


Test Error Semantics

Advisory: Test error semantics, not error message strings.

// Bad: Brittle string comparison
if err.Error() != "invalid input" { ... }

// Good: Semantic check
if !errors.Is(err, ErrInvalidInput) { ... }

For simple presence checks when specific semantics don't matter:

if gotErr := err != nil; gotErr != tt.wantErr {
    t.Errorf("f(%v) error = %v, want error presence = %t", tt.input, err, tt.wantErr)
}

Test Organization

Read references/TEST-ORGANIZATION.md when working with test doubles, choosing test package placement, or scoping test setup.

Read references/VALIDATION-APIS.md when designing reusable test validation functions.


Integration Testing

Read references/INTEGRATION.md when writing TestMain, acceptance tests, or tests that need real HTTP/RPC transports.


Available Scripts

  • scripts/gen-table-test.sh — Generates a table-driven test scaffold
bash scripts/gen-table-test.sh ParseConfig config > config/parse_config_test.go
bash scripts/gen-table-test.sh --parallel ParseConfig config      # with t.Parallel()
bash scripts/gen-table-test.sh --output config/parse_config_test.go ParseConfig config

Related Skills

  • Error testing: See go-error-handling when testing error semantics with errors.Is/errors.As or sentinel errors
  • Interface mocking: See go-interfaces when creating test doubles by implementing interfaces at the consumer side
  • Naming test functions: See go-naming when naming test functions, subtests, or test helper utilities
  • Linter integration: See go-linting when running linters alongside tests in CI or pre-commit hooks

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.625 reviews
  • Carlos Ghosh· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for go-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024

    go-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sofia Bhatia· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in go-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 3, 2024

    I recommend go-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Pratham Ware· Oct 22, 2024

    Useful defaults in go-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Carlos Gonzalez· Oct 6, 2024

    I recommend go-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 13, 2024

    go-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Maya Harris· Sep 1, 2024

    Registry listing for go-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Aanya Brown· Aug 20, 2024

    go-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Aug 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 25

1 / 3